Search

Background: Death pronouncement is an important moment that can impact a family's bereavement process; however, necessary improvements in physicians' behavior during death pronouncement remain unclear. Objectives: To explore whether the lack of certain behaviors by the physician was associated with a perceived need for improving death pronouncement for advanced cancer patients in palliative care units (PCUs). Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of a nationwide multicenter questionnaire survey conducted in 2018 that targeted bereaved family members of cancer patients who died in PCUs. We performed univariate analysis to investigate the need to improve behavior toward death pronouncement. We performed bivariate analysis to investigate the relationship among the need for improvement in behavior toward death pronouncement, physician attribution (primary responsible physician, a member of the same team, and another physician), and nine specific behaviors. Results: Four hundred twenty-two questionnaires (64.2%) were returned. We analyzed 356 responses and found that 32.5% perceived the need to improve death pronouncement. Lack of certain behaviors at death pronouncement, especially not explicitly explaining the cause of death to family members (odds ratio: 11.89, p?0.001), were positively associated with the need for improvement. There were significant differences among the types of physician attribution regarding the need for improvement (primary responsible physician vs. a member of the same team vs. another physician [15.1% vs. 42.6% vs. 45.7%, p?

Background: The beliefs and perceptions of parenteral nutrition and hydration (PNH) by advanced cancer patients have not been elucidated. Objectives: To clarify their beliefs and perceptions and to explore the relationships between their beliefs and perceptions and cachexia stages. Design/setting/subjects: A questionnaire survey of advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care across Japan. Measurements: We asked patients to answer 15 items regarding their beliefs and perceptions of PNH. Frequencies were calculated for the patient characteristics and survey parameters. Comparisons were performed using the Mann?Whitney U test. We conducted a factor analysis and a multiple logistic regression analysis to identify the independent factors affecting cancer cachexia stages. Results: Among 495 patients, 378 responded. Due to missing data, 357 remained in the frequency distribution analysis, and 344 were classified into the noncachexia group (n?=?174) and cachexia group (n?=?170). Approximately 60% thought that PNH were beneficial. Approximately 70% considered PNH a standard medical practice. Approximately 70% did not feel that they received a sufficient explanation. There were no significant differences in any items between the two groups. We extracted four conceptual groups. The concept of ?Belief that PNH are harmful? was identified as an independent factor [odds ratio 2.57 (95% confidence intervals 1.10?6.01), p?=?0.030]. Conclusion: More than half of the patients thought that PNH were beneficial and standard medical practices with or without cancer cachexia. The negative perception of PNH decreased in patients with cancer cachexia.

Background: Informing families of a patient's death is one of the most challenging responsibilities of clinicians who provide care for terminally ill patients. Although death pronouncement can be a highly stressful event for clinicians, no previous study has reported qualitative characteristics of the burden experienced by clinicians related to death pronouncements. Moreover, no scale has been developed to assess this burden. Objective: This study sought to develop a scale to evaluate clinicians' burden related to death pronouncement (Death Pronouncement Burden Scale for oncology practice [DPBS-oncol]) and examine its reliability and validity in Japan. Methods: We presented the DPBS-oncol to clinicians involved in oncology practice and examined its reliability and discriminant validity. To investigate the test-retest reliability of the scale, the DPBS-oncol was presented a second time to a subsample of the clinicians. Results: Factor analysis required a grouping of the 15 DPBS-oncol items into one factor. Cronbach's ? coefficient of the total score of DPBS-oncol was 0.94, and the intraclass correlation coefficient of the total score of DPBS-oncol was 0.89. Regarding discriminant validity, DPBS-oncol total score was moderately correlated with other available scales for assessing clinicians' attitudes to end-of-life care. Conclusion: This study was the first to develop a scale to evaluate clinicians' burden related to death pronouncement. The DPBS-oncol, which includes 15 items, was validated and shown to have sufficient reliability.

Background: Bathing in a tub is integral to Japanese culture. It improves palliative care patients' symptoms and may improve quality of life. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and impressions of bathing for terminally ill cancer patients and its relations to the evaluations of perceived end-of-life care and achievement of a good death. Design: This was a cross-sectional, anonymous, self-report questionnaire survey. Setting/Subjects: The questionnaire for this study was sent to bereaved family members who had lost loved ones in 14 general hospitals and 187 palliative care wards in Japan. Measurements: The bereaved family members of the patients who had actually bathed were asked about their impression of bathing. The short version of the Good Death Inventory (GDI) and the Care Evaluation Scale were used to evaluate ?achievement of a good death.? In total, 1819 surveys were sent between July and September 2018 to bereaved family members of patients who had died between February 2014 and January 2018 in 14 general hospitals and 187 palliative care wards in Japan. Overall 885 questionnaires (valid response rate 48%) returned by bereaved family members were analyzed. Results: Overall, 85% of bereaved family members of patients who bathed evaluated the experience positively, 86% reported that the patient's face seemed to become calm after the bath, and 28% of bereaved family members whose loved one had not bathed reported regretting it. The total GDI score for the bereaved family's desired death was 82.7???13.0 for the bathing group and 75.4???15.7 for the no bathing group, a significant difference (effect size?=?0.52, p?0.01). Conclusions: Bathing before death was evaluated positively and was associated with the achievement of a good death.

Background: Data regarding the quality of end-of-life care for patients with noncancerous illnesses are lacking. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate end-of-life care for patients with noncancerous respiratory disease from the perspective of bereaved family members and explore the factors associated with the quality of patient death and care. Design: This cross-sectional study included patients who had died of noncancerous respiratory disease in general wards of pulmonary department in Japan between 2014 and 2016 and conducted an anonymous self-report questionnaire survey for the patients' bereaved family members. Measurements: We evaluated overall satisfaction with care and the quality of death and end-of-life care using the Good Death Inventory (GDI) and Care Evaluation Scale (CES), respectively. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to explore the factors associated with these outcomes. Results: In total, 130 questionnaires were distributed, and the effective response rate was 38% and 50 patients were included (median age: 82 [range 58?101] years; 37 men [74%]). Primary diagnoses at death included 29 cases of pneumonia (58%), 15 interstitial lung disease (30%), and 3 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (6%). Of the bereaved family members, 26 (52%) were spouses, and 19 (38%) were children (median age [range]: 68 [33?102] years, 15 men [30%]). The overall CES and GDI scores (mean???standard deviation) were 77???15 and 79???15, respectively. The presence of dementia was an independent factor associated with high CES and GDI scores in the multiple linear regression analysis. Conclusions: In patients who died of noncancerous respiratory disease, the presence of dementia could be associated with the higher quality of patient death and care. In dementia, an understanding of the terminal nature of this condition may lead to an appropriate end-of-life care.

Background: During end-of-life care, the place in which the patients spend time influences their quality of life. Objective: To clarify what it means to spend last days at home and in inpatient hospice. Design: This study was a part of a nationwide multicenter questionnaire survey of bereaved family members of cancer patients evaluating the quality of end-of-life care in Japan. Setting/Subjects: A nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted with 779 family members of cancer patients who had died at inpatient hospices. We asked participants about the perceived benefits of spending last days at home and inpatient hospice during the patient's last days. Measurements: A nationwide questionnaire. Results: Of participants, 37.6% (n?=?185 [95% confidence interval, 33%?42%]) felt that the inpatient hospice was like a home. The family members who reported that the inpatient hospice felt like home significantly tended to report high satisfaction with the level of care (p?0.01). Factors that the participants perceived as benefits of the inpatient hospice were: ?If anything changes, as health care professionals are easily available, he/she can handle it? (88.1%), ?he/she is reassured? (78.4%), and ?he/she is safe? (72.7%). On the contrary, factors that they perceived as benefits of home were: ?He/she can do what he/she wants to do without worrying about the eye of other people? (44.1%), ?he/she can relax? (43.5%), and ?he/she is free? (42.0%). Conclusions: Spending the last days of life in either an inpatient hospice or at home has specific benefits. The place a patient spends his/her end-of-life days should be based on patient and family values.

Background: Toward the individualized care of terminally ill patients with dyspnea (?terminal dyspnea?), it is essential to identify individualized goals of care (GOC) to achieve an acceptable balance between dyspnea intensity and communication capacity. Objective: To explore preferences for individualized GOC for terminal dyspnea, and factors associated with the preferences. Design: A nationwide cross-sectional survey. Setting/Subjects: In total, 1055 bereaved families of cancer patients admitted to 167 inpatient hospices in Japan. Measurements: Preferences for individualized GOC for terminal dyspnea to achieve an acceptable balance between dyspnea intensity and communication capacity, should individuals experience continuous moderate or severe/overwhelming dyspnea despite optimal palliative care, and perceptions about a good death. Results: Among 548 participants (response rate?=?52%), we analyzed responses of 477 families whose loved one suffered dyspnea in the last week of life. In total, 167 (45%; 95% confidence interval [CI]?=?40%?50%) and 272 (80%; 95% CI?=?75%?84%) participants would prioritize dyspnea relief over communication capacity, should they continuously suffer moderate or severe/overwhelming dyspnea, respectively. In multivariate analyses, the determinants of the prioritization of dyspnea relief were perceiving physical comfort as important for a good death (odds ratio [OR]?=?1.389; 95% CI?=?1.062?1.818; p?=?0.017) in moderate dyspnea, and perceiving physical comfort (OR?=?2.505; 95% CI?=?1.718?3.651; p?0.001) and not perceiving mental awareness (OR?=?0.695; 95% CI?=?0.529?0.913; p?=?0.009) as important in severe/overwhelming dyspnea. Conclusions: Preferences for individualized GOC for terminal dyspnea can vary among individuals and with different symptom intensity, and may be influenced by perceptions about a good death. Outcome measurements incorporating an acceptable balance between dyspnea intensity and communication capacity should be developed.

Background: Limited information is available on the relationship between C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and pain in advanced cancer. Objectives: To investigate the relationship between serum levels of CRP and subtypes of pain. Design: A secondary cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort study. Setting/Subjects: Patients with advanced cancer admitted to 23 palliative care units in Japan. Measurements: Patients rated the severity of pain on the numerical rating scale (NRS) and physicians evaluated pain on the integrated palliative care outcome scale (IPOS). Physicians assessed neuropathic pain and breakthrough pain based on their presence or absence. Patients were divided into four groups according to CRP levels. Comparisons were performed using the Kruskal?Wallis test or chi-squared test. To evaluate the relationship between CRP and subtypes of pain, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in logistic models were calculated. Results: We divided 1513 patients into four groups: low CRP (n?=?234), moderate CRP (n?=?513), high CRP (n?=?352), and very high CRP (n?=?414). Spearman's correlation coefficient between CRP and pain NRS and that between CRP and pain IPOS were 0.15 (p?0.001) and 0.16 (p?