Search

Malnutrition in chronic pancreatitis (CP) has prognostic value and there is limited data on the prevalence, predictors of malnutrition in CP and its effect on Quality of life (QoL). A retrospective study was conducted in patients with CP to assess the prevalence of malnutrition as per the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. Multivariable-adjusted regression was used to identify independent predictors of both malnutrition and global QoL. A total of 297 patients were included and the most common etiology of CP was idiopathic (75%) and alcohol (25%). The prevalence of malnutrition was 46.4% as per GLIM criteria. On univariate analysis, the risk of malnutrition was significantly higher in alcoholic etiology (p = 0.001), current alcohol consumption (p = 0.001), smokers (p < 0.001), those having higher cumulative days of pain in last 6 months (p < 0.001) and lower daily calorie intake (p = 0.019). On multivariate analysis, malnutrition was independently associated with current alcohol consumption (Odds ratio: 3.22, p = 0.017), current smokers (OR: 2.23, p = 0.042) and those having higher cumulative days of abdominal pain (OR: 1.01, p < 0.001), while higher daily calorie intake (per 100 kcal) (OR:0.94, p = 0.023) has reduced risk of malnutrition. Malnutrition (p = 0.015) and higher cumulative days of abdominal pain (p < 0.001) were independently associated with lower global QoL in patients with CP. Malnutrition is frequent in patients with CP; and current alcohol consumption, smoking and higher cumulative days of abdominal pain independently predicts risk of developing malnutrition. Patients with malnutrition and higher cumulative days of pain has poorer quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) can adversely affect the outcome in patients of acute pancreatitis (AP). Effect of percutaneous drainage (PCD) on IAH has not been studied. We studied the effect of PCD on IAH in patients with acute fluid collections. Consecutive patients of AP undergoing PCD between Jan 2016 and May 2018 were evaluated for severity markers, clinical course, hospital and ICU stay, and mortality. Patients were divided into two groups: with IAH and with no IAH (NIAH). The two groups were compared for severity scores, organ failure, hospital and ICU stay, reduction in IAP and mortality. Of the 105 patients, IAH was present in 48 (45.7%) patients. Patients with IAH had more often severe disease, BISAP ≥2, higher APACHE II scores and computed tomography severity index (CTSI). IAH group had more often OF (87.5% vs. 70.2%, p = 0.033), prolonged ICU stay (12.5 vs. 6.75 days, p = 0.007) and higher mortality (52.1% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.001). After PCD, IAP decreased significantly more in the IAH group (21.85 ± 4.53 mmHg to 12.5 ± 4.42 mmHg) than in the NIAH group (12.68 ± 2.72 mmHg to 8.32 ± 3.18 mmHg), p = <0.001. Reduction of IAP in patients with IAH by >40% at 48 h after PCD was associated with better survival (63.3% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.006). We observed that patients with IAH have poor outcome. PCD decreases IAP and a fall in IAP >40% of baseline value predicts a better outcome after PCD in patients with acute fluid collections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ascites in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) is understudied although recent literature hints at its evident role in the final outcome. This study was planned to study the characteristics of ascites in patients of AP and its effect on the disease course and outcome. Consecutive patients of AP were studied and patients with or without ascites were evaluated for the baseline parameters and severity assessment. Ascites was quantified and fluid analyzed for its characteristics. Intraabdominal pressure (IAP) was monitored. The various outcome parameters were compared between the two groups of patients with and without ascites. Of the cohort of 213 patients, 82 (38.5%) developed ascites. Ascites group had significantly higher rates of organ failure (p = 0.001), necrosis (p=<0.001) and higher severity assessment scores. The ascites group had significantly longer hospital and ICU stay and higher ventilator days compared to the non-ascites group. Mortality was also higher in the ascites group (34.1% vs 8.45; p = 0.001). Majority of patients with ascites had moderate to gross ascites (75.6%), low serum ascites albumin gradient (87.8%) with low amylase levels (71.9%). Sub-group analysis in ascites group showed that patients with fatal outcome had higher rates of moderate to gross ascites, higher baseline IAP and lower reduction in IAP after 48 h. Moderate to gross ascites and grades of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) were significant predictors of mortality (AUC – 0.76). AP patients with ascites have a more severe disease with poorer outcome. Higher degrees of ascites and IAH grades are significant predictors of mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]