Search

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are currently graded using the World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 system, which is based solely on mitotic count and Ki-67 proliferative index. Although necrosis is a well recognised adverse prognostic feature that is included in the grading systems of NETs of certain types such as pulmonary carcinoid and medullary thyroid carcinoma, there is currently insufficient evidence to support its inclusion in the grading of pancreatic NETs. Therefore, we sought to investigate the prognostic significance of tumour necrosis in our cohort of resected pancreatic NETs, with a view to providing evidence to support its incorporation into the WHO grading scheme. Under our proposal, pancreatic NETs without necrosis would continue to be graded based solely on mitotic count and Ki-67 index using the established WHO cut-offs, while NETs with tumour necrosis would be classified as grade 3, irrespective of proliferative activity. Using this system in our cohort of 110 resected pancreatic NETs, overall survival (OS) was 250, 198, and 151 months (p=0.039) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 180 months, 117 months, and 38 months (p<0.0001) for grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In contrast, there was no significant difference in OS (p=0.231) or DFS (p=0.058) between low grade (grade 1) and intermediate-high grade (grade 2/3) tumours using the current WHO system which does not consider necrosis. Interobserver concordance for assessment of necrosis was excellent. In conclusion, necrosis is an independent predictor of OS and DFS for pancreatic NETs, and our findings strongly support its addition to the grading scheme for this tumour., (Copyright © 2022 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Several prognostic nomograms designed to predict survival after curative resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) have been proposed. Recently, routine pathological assessment has evolved with subtle changes to the AJCC staging system, and routine screening for mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). Therefore we sought to develop and validate a new prognostic nomogram. All cause survival data from 4517 consecutive patients with primary CRC were used as independent training and validation cohorts to develop a final model including only: age, sex, tumour stage, nodal status, number of lymph nodes resected, apical node status, distant metastases, thin-walled vascular invasion, and MMR status. Patients were stratified into four risk groups to assess model discrimination and calibration. To assess discrimination, the area-under-the-curve (AUC) of a receiver-operator-curve (ROC), concordance-index (C-index), and D-index were calculated. The model was compared to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) CRC nomogram and the AJCC TNM staging. Based on the 5-year ROC analysis, the AUC for our model was 0.81 (0.79 and 0.74 for MSKCC and AJCC, respectively). Moreover, our model demonstrated a concordance index of 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.82) compared to 0.75 (95% CI 0.68-0.81) for MSKCC and 0.73 (95% CI 0.65-0.79) for AJCC. In conclusion, our new prognostic nomogram incorporates a larger number of clinically relevant prognostic markers, including MMR status, and therefore demonstrates improved predictive capability. As these factors are routinely assessed, it is hoped that this model will inform prognostication and difficult management decisions, such as patient selection for adjuvant therapy., (Copyright © 2021 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The recently published 5th edition 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System brings significant changes from the 2010 4th edition. An emphasis on uniformity in nomenclature and grading for tumours across all organ systems is a particular feature of the 5th edition blue book series that is reflected in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) classification. For example, simplified two tiered grading is reinforced for preinvasive lesions throughout the GIT, with dysplasia at all sites now being considered either low or high grade. Similarly, a uniform approach to classification and grading of GIT neuroendocrine neoplasms has been consolidated, with an emphasis on distinguishing grade 3 neuroendocrine tumours from neuroendocrine carcinomas. In this review, we discuss and critically assess the important and sometimes controversial changes made to the classification of tumours of the lower GIT, comprising the colorectum, vermiform appendix and anal canal. The particularly controversial decision to endorse the term 'sessile serrated lesion' for lesions previously termed 'sessile serrated polyp/adenoma' is explored. The morphological, molecular, and clinical insights behind the substitution of the term 'goblet cell adenocarcinoma' for 'goblet cell carcinoid' are assessed. The evolution of the classification of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms is considered. Inflammatory bowel disease related dysplasia and its evolving subtypes, with major implications for pathologists in routine practice, is explained., (Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Despite a trend towards universal testing, best practice to screen patients presenting with gynaecological malignancy for Lynch syndrome (LS) is uncertain. We report our institutional experience of a co-ordinated gynaecological LS screening program. All patients with endometrial carcinoma or carcinosarcoma, or gynaecological endometrioid or clear cell carcinomas undergo reflex four panel immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 followed by cascade somatic hypermethylation analysis of the MLH1 promoter locus for dual MLH1/PMS2 negative tumours. On the basis of these results, genetic counselling and targeted germline mutation testing is then offered to patients considered at high risk of LS. From 1 August 2013 to 31 December 2015, 124 patients were screened (mean age 64.6 years). Thirty-six (29.0%) demonstrated abnormal MMR IHC: 26 (72.2%) showed dual loss of MLH1/PMS2, five (13.9%) dual loss of MSH2/MSH6, three (8.3%) isolated loss of MSH6, and two (5.6%) isolated loss of PMS2. Twenty-five of 26 (96.1%) patients with dual MLH1/PMS2 loss demonstrated MLH1 promoter methylation. Therefore, 11 (8.9%) patients screened were classified as high risk for LS, of whom nine (81.8%) accepted germline mutation testing. Three (2.4% of total screened) were confirmed to have LS, two with germline PMS2 and one with germline MSH2 mutation. Massive parallel sequencing of tumour tissue demonstrated somatic mutations which were concordant with the IHC results in the remainder. Interestingly, the one MLH1/PMS2 IHC negative but not hypermethylated tumour harboured only somatic MLH1 mutations, indicating that universal cascade methylation testing in MLH1/PMS2 IHC negative tumours is very low yield and could be reconsidered in a resource-poor setting. In conclusion, universal screening for LS in patients presenting with gynaecological malignancy using the algorithm described above identified LS in three of 124 (2.4%) of our population. Only three of nine (33.3%) patients considered at high risk for LS by combined IHC and hypermethylation analysis were proven to have LS. Only one of the LS patients was less than 50 years of age and none of these patients would have been identified had more restrictive Amsterdam or Bethesda criteria been applied., (Crown Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)