Search

There has been a recent upsurge in worldwide attention on digital pathology, which has transformed from static snapshots from camera-equipped microscopes to its modern form that encompasses scanning of whole glass slides with evaluation of histological images on a computer screen, along with management of its accompanying information. Although it has been widely accepted in education and research, its implementation in diagnostic surgical pathology practice is not without challenges in workflow integration, technological infrastructure, pathologist acclimatisation, global standardisation for clinical practice, and cost issues, among others. Nonetheless, early adopters have harnessed its benefits in specific niches, like frozen section services and remote second opinion consultations. Its tremendous potential is worthy of further validation to compare with conventional glass slide evaluation, even while it is already paving the way for advancement into virtual three-dimensional imaging technology, with a glimpse into a possible future digital diagnostic pathology practice.

Aim: The increase in early detection of prostate cancer in the Asian population has bolstered second opinion consultations in prostate pathology in this region. In this review, we aimed to identify the spectrum of lesions and queries submitted to a pathologist with uropathology interest at the Singapore General Hospital., Method: Request forms for second opinion prostate consultations from pathologists and clinicians were retrieved from central laboratory records and a specialist's correspondence files within 2004-2007. Histomorphological queries raised in the referrals, and comparison of original diagnosis and Gleason scoring with the review diagnoses were collated., Results: Discordant diagnoses (183/323, 57%) were more common than concordant diagnoses (143/326, 44%) between original diagnosis and subspecialist review. The majority of discordances comprised initial undergrading of Gleason scores (132/183, 72%; p < 0.01) especially in needle core biopsies. Among the significantly altered pathological diagnoses, 24 cases (13%; p < 0.01) were changed from benign to malignant (n = 9, 5%; p < 0.01), and malignant to benign (n = 11, 6%; p < 0.01) or high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 4, 2%; p < 0.01). Benign mimics of malignancy such as atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and atrophy, and small foci of adenocarcinoma, were some examples of morphological pitfalls., Conclusion: Prostate biopsy review is important because of management and prognostic implications that vary among Gleason scores, and predictive parameters that are detailed in prostate pathology reports.

Columnar cell lesions of the breast refer to the morphological spectrum of alterations of the epithelial lining of variably dilated acini of the terminal duct lobular unit (TDLU), often related to secretions and calcifications. After decades of varied terminologies, the term of 'flat epithelial atypia' by the World Health Organization (WHO) consensus group encompasses the part of the spectrum where columnar cell change or columnar cell hyperplasia acquires low grade cytological atypia, merging with atypical ductal hyperplasia and low grade ductal carcinoma in situ. Its association with low grade invasive carcinoma and lobular neoplasia, whether by proximity to these lesions, or by similar molecular expressions, has prompted greater scrutiny into its clinical significance. Although recent literature attempts to refine the term 'flat epithelial atypia', the applicability of its morphological criteria in routine diagnostic practice remains to be seen, and interobserver variability is highly possible. This poses even greater challenges especially in limited samples of breast tissue, such as in core biopsies, for pre-operative decision-making. The purpose of this review is to elucidate evolving clinical and diagnostically relevant principles that surround and influence the significance of this still controversial entity, especially when discovered on core biopsy in the initial phase of breast diagnosis and management.

Aims: We aimed to identify common reasons for second opinion breast pathology referrals at the Pathology Department, Singapore General Hospital, focusing on queries and diagnostic issues raised by referring clinicians and pathologists., Methods: Request forms for breast pathology consultations were retrieved from a specialist's correspondence files consisting of pathologists' referrals, and from centralised laboratory records, comprising clinician-initiated referrals. Clinical and histomorphological queries raised by the referrals were collated., Results: Of 299 cases evaluated, clinician-initiated referrals (n = 137, 46%) included requests for review of overall histopathology to confirm carcinoma subtype (n = 47), grade (n = 2), size (n = 4), lymphovascular invasion (n = 1) and confirm hormonal receptor and c-erbB-2 assays (n = 33). Also required were: comparison of recurrent with previous lesions (n = 8); settling discrepant diagnoses between two or more prior pathology reports (n = 4); verification of microinvasion (n = 6), in situ carcinomas (n = 6) or atypical ductal hyperplasias (n = 4); delineation of benign (n = 8) and spindle cell lesions (n = 3); to establish a breast origin of metastatic lesions (n = 5); and distinction of carcinoma from lymphoma (n = 2). Pathologist-initiated referrals (n = 162, 54%) sought arbitration between borderline proliferative lesions (n = 46) and papillary lesions (n = 34); verification of microinvasion (n = 23), stromal lesions (n = 16), and carcinoma subtype (n = 13), especially if the patient was young (n = 5); clarification of metaplastic changes (n = 4) and lobular neoplasia (n = 8); and comparison of fibroepithelial lesions (n = 11)., Conclusions: Clinicians sought a second opinion mainly to verify histological diagnoses and report important pathological details for staging and confirmation of hormonal receptor and c-erbB-2 status prior to therapy. Borderline breast lesions are worrisome for both clinicians and pathologists in view of implications for management.