Search

Abstract: Objective: In this study among patients with cancer in the palliative phase, we analysed whether assessing the symptom, which is causing the most trouble in the patient''s every day life (‘most troublesome’ symptom) had added value apart from the presence and severity of symptoms, which are most commonly assessed in clinical practice. Methods: Patients with cancer (lung, gastro-intestinal, breast cancer) in the palliative phase from two non-academic hospitals were included in the study. Using the Symptom Monitor tool, 10 physical symptoms were assessed with regard to presence and severity. The Symptom Monitor has an extra added item indicating as the ‘most troublesome’ symptom. This item was monitored to determine whether it had added value apart from the presence of symptoms and ‘most severe’ symptom. The severity score on the indicated ‘most troublesome’ symptom was subtracted from the severity score of the ‘most severe’ symptom. The generated delta score of 0 indicated no added value, whereas a score of one or more indicated that the ‘most troublesome’ symptom would have been missed if not specifically asked for by the physician, because its severity was lower that the ‘most severe’ symptom. Results: One hundred and forty-six patients reported 590 symptoms to be present. In total, 227 symptoms were reported as ‘most severe’ symptom (n =138 patients). Among these, fatigue (n =52) and pain (n =24) were reported most frequently as ‘most severe’ symptom. In total, 134 patients indicated a symptom as ‘most troublesome’. Fatigue (n =33; 25%) and pain (n =22; 16%) were also indicated by most of these patients as the ‘most troublesome’ symptom. One hundred and fifty-two comparisons could be made between the ‘most severe’ and the ‘most troublesome’ symptom. In 102 (67%) of the comparisons assessing the ‘most troublesome’ symptom had no added value: the score for ‘most severe’ symptom did not differ from the score for the ‘most troublesome’ symptom revealing a delta score of 0. In 23 times (15%) of the 152 comparisons made, the delta score was 1 and in 27 (18%) of the comparisons the delta score was 2 or more indicating that assessing the ‘most troublesome’ symptom substantially had added value. Conclusion: In patients in the palliative phase of their disease, extra attention for the ‘most troublesome’ symptom is needed. In our study, in almost 1/3 of the cases, this symptom would have been missed the physicians attention if not specifically asked for. Practice implications: We recommend not only to assess the presence and severity of symptoms, but furthermore to assess the patient''s ‘most troublesome’ symptom in addition. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This study presents a comprehensive overview of the problems patients experience in a palliative phase of cancer. A two-step qualitative method was used: in-depth interviews with patients and relatives (N=9 patients+7 relatives), followed by interviews (N=31 patients+15 relatives) using a checklist to confirm and complete the picture. Quality of life and quality of care domains were addressed. Patients experienced problems in all of these palliative care domains, although individual patients may have experienced only a few problems. Fatigue, feelings of futility, reluctance to accept help, fear of suffering and the fear that help would not be available if needed, were common problems. Communication problems arose when a grudge against a GP had remained, or because one family member tried to spare the other a confrontation with his/her feelings of fear or grief. A comprehensive checklist of relevant problems is presented. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: To gain insight into the experiences of a palliative care patient and her husband who were living on borrowed time. Methods: A qualitative single case design was used. Systematic content analysis of the interview data, obtained in an in-depth semi-structured interview, from the husband and wife was conducted to extract themes relating to living on borrowed time. Results: Three themes were identified: shifts in the interpretation of physical signs and symptoms, altered view of the future and altered choices and priorities. Conclusion: The identified themes lead to a better understanding of the phenomenon of living on borrowed time. Yet, refinement of, and variation within the themes still need to be studied in order to get more grips on the themes and to be better able to help patients to integrate the ‘new reality’. Practice implications: Our findings can be used to support professionals in the practical application of care when their patients need to integrate the ‘new reality’ and seek new equilibrium, e.g. converted into a conversational guide, or used for educational purposes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]