Search

Introduction: Patient outcomes resulting from optimal type 1 diabetes (T1D) care have historically focused on driving a single metric, hemoglobin A1c. Our objectives were to design, build, and launch an aggregate clinical indicator that comprehensively reflects patient management status beyond hemoglobin A1c alone. This project aimed to show proof of principle that an aggregate score comprised of T1D outcome metrics could be built to track quality performance. Methods: We established an electronic medical record-based diabetes registry and utilized its population health modules to design and build this diabetes care metric. Elements representing optimal diabetes management, as defined by current guidelines and expert opinion, were identified. Nine elements fall into categories of management tools, care assessments, and complications risk. The Type 1 Diabetes Composite Score (T1DCS) aggregates these outcome measures to reflect the overall diabetes care status for each patient. Higher scores suggest better management and overall improved patient health. Results: We launched this metric build in November 2018 and applied the scoring to our T1D population (≈1,900 patients). The T1DCS quickly provides a summary of current diabetes management status. T1DCS viewed over the registry cohort demonstrates a normal distribution, and scores improved from March to September 2019, reflecting better care and outcomes, and illustrating the potential to track program effectiveness. Conclusions: The T1DCS is a useful metric to evaluate the clinical status of T1D patients, assess the capability of a clinical program to achieve optimal diabetes outcomes, identify patient diversity opportunities, and document outcome improvement as a novel comprehensive quality measure.

Background Trichomonas is a common sexually transmitted infection (STI) among adolescents, causing vaginal discharge, pelvic pain, and dysuria. Affected individuals have increased susceptibility to other STIs and may have pregnancy complications. A quality improvement project was developed to increase trichomonas testing among high-risk adolescent patients from 40% in July 2014 to 100% by December 31, 2014, and sustain over 6 months. Methods An interdisciplinary team (providers and support staff) was assembled to address this objective. We collected 6 months of baseline data. Deploying the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Model for Improvement, we formulated an aim statement and identified key drivers. We used cause analysis to identify interventions for each problem area. Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were undertaken, and results were monitored using control charts. Interventions included increasing awareness and education for clinical staff; changing computer order entry for the test; using order sets for STI; and adding a Licensed Professional Initiated Protocol to nurse ordering practice. These interventions were all done in conjunction with feedback to providers for individual missed cases. Results Over 18 months, the trichomonas testing rate rose with each intervention: from 25% (January 2014) to 98% (December 2014), which we have sustained through June 2015. Implications and contributions This article demonstrates the successful use of quality improvement methodology to increase rates of Trichomonas vaginalis testing among at-risk adolescent patients. Increased testing results in increased detection and improved treatment and sexual health for our patients. Conclusion Improving the trichomonas testing process in the pediatric emergency department results in higher screening rates among high-risk adolescent patients.