Search

Objectives The risk of development of enteric peritonitis in Chinese peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with colonic diverticulosis is not known. There have been no reports on whether colonic diverticulosis may affect peritonitis outcomes. The objectives of this study were to examine whether colonic diverticulosis is a risk factor for the development of enteric peritonitis and to study its influence on the outcome of enteric peritonitis. Patients and Methods All continuous ambulatory PD patients that had barium enema and colonoscopic examinations performed between January 1994 and January 2006 were included. They were divided into 2 groups: patients with diverticulosis and patients without diverticulosis. Their demographic and clinical characteristics, colonic examination findings, and peritonitis data were compared and analyzed. Results 104 Chinese patients received 110 colonoscopies and 51 barium enema examinations. 25 patients (24.0%) had colonic diverticulosis. Patients with diverticulosis were older (65.4 ± 14.7 vs 58.4 ± 14.0 years, p = 0.033). The most common site of involvement of diverticulosis was the ascending colon (56%). 128 episodes of enteric peritonitis were recorded in 49 patients. Compared with patients without enteric peritonitis, more patients in the enteric peritonitis group had diverticulosis (38.8% vs 10.9%, p = 0.001) and diverticulosis most often involved the ascending colon (20.4% vs 7.3%, p = 0.082). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of diverticulosis (hazard ratio 5.17, 95% confidence interval 1.86 – 14.40; p = 0.002) and diverticulosis involving the ascending colon (hazard ratio 6.89, 95% confidence interval 1.43 – 33.32, p = 0.016) were independent risk factors for the development of enteric peritonitis. Enteric peritonitis in patients with diverticulosis had a higher but nonsignificant treatment failure rate (26.9% vs 18.4%, p = 0.282). Conclusion In this selected cohort of PD patients with indications of colonic examinations, diverticulosis, especially involving the ascending colon, may be a risk factor for the development of enteric peritonitis. Colonic diverticulosis does not appear to affect the outcome of enteric peritonitis. Further studies are warranted to determine ways to prevent enteric peritonitis in PD patients with diverticulosis.

ObjectiveWe compared outcomes for catheters with different configurations: conventional straight, swan-neck straight tip, and swan-neck curled tip.DesignThe study was conducted as a prospective randomized controlled trial in the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) unit of a university center.Patients and MethodsWe randomized 93 new regular CAPD patients without prior peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion to receive a conventional straight, double-cuffed catheter (CS), a swan-neck straight catheter (SNC), or a swan-neck curled tip catheter (SNC) in 2:1:1 ratio.ResultsThe exit-site infection (ESI) rate was slightly lower with swan-neck catheters as compared with straight catheters, but the difference was not statistically significant. The peritonitis rate and overall catheter survival were similar. In Staphylococcus aureus nasal non carriers as compared with carriers, ESI-free catheter survival was significantly better with swan-neck catheters ( p = 0.0302 and p = 0.82 respectively). As compared with SC catheters, SNC catheters had a significantly higher migration rate ( p = 0.022).ConclusionsSwan-neck catheters were associated with a slightly better ESI rate, but SNC catheters are not routinely recommended because of a high migration rate. The SNS catheter is therefore recommended as the first-line catheter of choice, particularly in populations with a low rate of S. aureus nasal carriage.

Objective The ISPD 2005 guidelines for peritonitis recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing colonoscopy with polypectomy while on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) but there is little literature to support this recommendation. This study aimed to look into the risks and outcomes of peritonitis after colonoscopy in CAPD patients. Patients and Methods All records of flexible colonoscopy performed on our CAPD patients from January 1994 to January 2006 were retrieved. Demographic and clinical data, use of antibiotics before colonoscopy, endoscopic findings, procedure performed, and peritonitis data were analyzed. Results 77 CAPD patients underwent 97 colonoscopies. No peritonitis developed in the 18 cases where antibiotics were given before colonoscopy. Among those without antibiotic prophylaxis, 4 episodes of peritonitis occurred within 24 hours after the procedure and 1 occurred 5 days later. All responded to intraperitoneal antibiotics. Colonic biopsy and polypectomy were not associated with more peritonitis (2 in 41 with biopsy vs 3 in 38 without biopsy, p = 0.67; 1 in 30 with polypectomy vs 4 in 49 without polypectomy, p = 0.64). Conclusion The risk of peritonitis after colonoscopy without antibiotic prophylaxis was 6.3%. All peritonitis episodes responded to intraperitoneal antibiotics. Colonic biopsy or polypectomy did not appear to increase the risk of peritonitis. Although statistically not significant when compared with patients without antibiotic prophylaxis, we observed no peritonitis after colonoscopy in patients that were given antibiotics for prophylactic purposes or for other reasons. The efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics would be better defined by large randomized trials.