Search

In this paper we try to raise caution against the consequences of the overwhelming drive for microfinance institutions to become financially self-sustainable-more often than not pushed into this by international organizations. Such a push can have severe consequences, ranging from mission drift to questionable practices employed by institutions. Focusing on India, we discuss the extent to which donors influence the microfinance sector and identify the role that international organizations play in pushing microfinance institutions away from their primary objective of delivering financial services to the poor. Revisiting the microfinance crisis which erupted in India in March 2006, this case study reveals a fundamental problem: the zeal of private and public actors, driven by motives that are hard to relate to the fight against poverty, a new commercial niche for the former and a collection of vote banks for the latter. Understanding the origin, the driving forces, and the extent of this problem may not only help us work out an improved governance process, but may also help us evaluate the reach and limits of microfinance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years microcredit has grown rapidly based on its promise to alleviate poverty and empower women. However, as the microcredit industry has grown, the initial emphasis on poverty alleviation and empowerment has changed; some critics argue that the industry now looks like commercial finance. This article explores these criticisms by comparing two microcredit programs in Chennai, India. Both programs work with the same population but take different approaches to credit delivery. Drawing from the participants' testimonies, the findings suggest that in general, the loans do not permanently move participants out of poverty; however, they do reduce some of the vulnerabilities associated with poverty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]