1. The biological activity of acifluorfen-sodium and its relationship to wetting, penetration and wax composition in four species.
- Author
-
Willingham, Gary L., Graham, Linda L., and Westmoreland, David G.
- Subjects
ACIFLUORFEN ,SODIUM salts ,ABUTILON ,XANTHIUM ,WETTING ,HYDROXYL group ,HERBICIDES ,BIOLOGICAL assay - Abstract
The biological activity of the sodium salt of acifluorfen was determined for velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti), cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum), morning-glory (Ipomoea sp.), and soybean (Glycine max) in greenhouse tests and by a leaf-disc efflux assay which bypasses cuticular penetration. The greenhouse activity in order of decreasing control was morning-glory > cocklebur > velvetleaf > soybean. Activity in the efflux assay in order of decreasing control was velvetleaf ≈︁ morning-glory > cocklebur > soybean. Leaf wetting was determined by contact angle measurements. Cocklebur wets very readily, and this was attributed partly to its more polar wax content. Soybean wets very poorly, primarily due to its large leaf hairs, which accounts for part of acifluorfen selectivity. Surfactants and inorganic salts increased penetration in a species-specific manner, and as penetration increased, so did activity. Acifluorfen-sodium is more active on velvetleaf than on cocklebur in a leaf-disc efflux assay, but in the greenhouse the reverse is true. This may be explained by the fact that penetration is eight times greater in cocklebur than in velvetleaf. The chemical composition of the leaf waxes was determined for each species by gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy ( GC/MS). Morning-glory and velvetleaf waxes consist mainly of long-chain esters. Soybean wax is primarily a C-30 alcohol. Cocklebur wax is primarily composed of one material which is not a typical leaf wax. This component could not be conclusively identified, but contains several carbonyls, several vinyl groups, and possibly a hydroxyl group. This wax is more polar than the other leaf waxes and seems to account for the extremely good wetting and high degree of penetration in cocklebur compared to the other species. Wax composition does not relate to penetration or activity in the other three species tested. More complex differences in cuticle structure and biological sensitivity probably account for differences in penetration and activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 1989
- Full Text
- View/download PDF