Search

Introduction: Warfarin's narrow therapeutic index and high variability in dosage requirements make dosage selection critical. Genetic factors are known to impact warfarin dosage selection. The Hmong are a unique Asian subpopulation numbering over 278,000 in the United States whose participation in genetics-based research is virtually nonexistent. The translational significance of early reports of warfarin pharmacogene differences in Hmong has not been evaluated., Objectives: (i) To validate previously identified allele frequency differences relevant to warfarin dosing in Hmong versus East Asians and (ii) to compare predicted warfarin sensitivity and maintenance doses between a Hmong population and an East Asian cohort., Method: DNA collected from two independent cohorts (n=236 and n=198) of Hmong adults were genotyped for CYP2C9 (*2, *3), VKORC1 (G-1639A), and CYP4F2 (*3). Allele frequencies between the combined Hmong cohort (n=433) and East Asians (n=1165) from the 2009 International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium (IWPC) study were compared using a χ 2 test. Percentages of Hmong and East Asian participants predicted to be very sensitive to warfarin were compared using a χ 2 test, and the predicted mean warfarin maintenance dose was compared with a t test., Results: The allele frequencies of CYP2C9*3 in the combined Hmong cohort and CYP4F2*3 in the VIP-Hmong cohort are significantly different from those in East Asians (18.9% vs 3.0%, p<0.001 and 9.8% vs 22.1%, p<0.001, respectively). Comparing the combined Hmong cohort to the East Asian cohort, the percentage of participants predicted to be very sensitive to warfarin was significantly higher (28% vs 5%, p<0.01) and the mean predicted warfarin maintenance dose was significantly lower (19.8 vs 21.3 mg/week, p<0.001), respectively., Conclusion: The unique allele frequencies related to warfarin when combined with nongenetic factors observed in the Hmong translate into clinically relevant differences in predicted maintenance dose requirements for Hmong versus East Asians., (© 2020 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

Objectives: Implementing pharmacogenetics for very important pharmacogenes (VIPs) holds the promise of improving clinical outcomes through optimal medication selection and dosing. However, significant differences in the frequency of actionable variants in VIPs may exist within subpopulations of a given ancestral group. Furthermore, these differences can potentially impact drug selection and dosing. The purpose of this study was to ascertain allele frequencies for VIPs and to predict medication requirements using Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines in Hmong and compare with published data for East Asians., Methods: Using a community-based participatory action research approach, DNA collected from 194 Hmong adults living in the United States was analyzed for 22 genetic variants within eight VIPs (CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP4F2, DPYD, G6PD, SLCO1B1, TPMT, VKORC1). Allele frequencies for VIPs and predicted medication requirements using CPIC guidelines were compared between Hmong participants and East Asians., Results: Significant differences in allele frequencies between the Hmong and East Asians were found for 23% (5/22) of the CPIC-actionable variants tested. Allele frequencies for VIPs in Hmong versus East Asians were 16.6% versus 3.4% in CYP2C9*3A, 42.2% versus 29.0% for CYP2C19*2, 0.3% versus 8.3% in CYP2C19*3, 6.5% versus 22.1% in CYP4F2*3, and 3.6% versus 0.1% in SLCO1B1*5, respectively. These differences significantly influenced predicted medication usage recommendations in warfarin, simvastatin, and phenytoin between Hmong and East Asians., Conclusions: Important differences in allele frequencies for key genetic variants influencing selection of medications and dosages were found between the Hmong and East Asians. The magnitude and nature of these differences can be expected to result in different medication recommendations for the Hmong relative to East Asians., (© 2019 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

Study Objectives: To objectively compare the results of a collaborative approach using pharmacists with the results of usual care for achieving a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) goal of 100 mg/dl or less in outpatients with documented coronary heart disease (CHD) who are not at goal, and to document the effect on LDL after removal of such a collaborative model from the study population., Design: Prospective, multiclinic, controlled study., Setting: Four clinics of a 19-clinic staff model health maintenance organization in Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. Two clinics treated the intervention patients, two the controls; one clinic for each group was suburban, and one for each was urban., Patients: Four hundred eighty-one patients aged 18 years or older with CHD and whose LDL levels were not at goal., Intervention: Clinical pharmacists implemented the physician-approved care plan for each intervention patient; activities included managing lipid-lowering drug therapy and educating patients on cardiovascular risk reduction., Measurements and Main Results: Primary outcomes were changes in LDL level and the proportion of patients achieving goal LDL in the intervention versus the usual care (control) group. Secondary outcomes were the sustainability of the impact observed up to 18 months after discontinuation of the intervention. Mean+/-SD baseline LDL levels were 131+/-28 and 131+/-26 mg/dl (p=NS) for the intervention and control groups, respectively. After a mean of 6.5 months follow-up, 107 (72%) patients in the intervention group and 61 (18%) patients in the control group had attained their LDL goal (p<0.001). Mean LDL levels were reduced by 35.6 mg/dl (27.5%) and 6.7 mg/dl (4.6%) in the intervention and control groups, respectively (p<0.001). When the active program was discontinued, results of the 18-month follow-up indicated that 85 (65%) intervention patients remained at goal compared with 96 (42%) controls (p<0.001)., Conclusion: This trial provides quantitative evidence to support the effectiveness of the collaborative approach as an intervention to optimize management of patients with CHD whose LDL levels are not at goal; this approach is specifically called for in the executive summary of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. Furthermore, this study documents both the magnitude and sustainability of the impact collaborative care models can have in managed care environments.

To determine the extent of achievement of goal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) as defined by National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel II (NCEP-ATP 11) and American Diabetes Association (ADA) 2000 guidelines, we conducted a retrospective study by integrating data from medical, laboratory, and pharmacy claims databases. Subjects were selected from a 232,000-member staff-model managed care organization consisting of 19 clinics in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, metropolitan area. A total of 124,971 members aged 18 years and older, who had been continuously enrolled from July 1, 1996-June 6, 1998, were included. Outcome measures were the extent of achievement of goal LDL as defined by NCEP-ATP II and the use of antihyperlipidemic drugs for patients with and without diabetes at various levels of risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). Of 124,971 subjects, 6538 had a history of CHD, 1523 of whom met their LDL goal. Of the population with CHD who did not achieve goal, 1141 (43%) missed by over 30 mg/dl; 621 (54%) of these patients were not receiving drug therapy A total of 17,267 had no history of CHD but had two or more risk factors; 3,298 of these achieved their LDL goal. Of those who did not achieve goal, 1,136 (35%) missed by over 30 mg/dl; 897 (79%) of these were not receiving drug therapy A total of 6,586 had a history of diabetes; 1,004 and 2,340 reached an LDL of 100 mg/dl or lower and less than 130 mg/dl, respectively Of those with diabetes who had an LDL greater than 100 mg/dl, 1,276 (49%) missed their goal by over 30 mg/dl; 898 (70%) of these were not receiving drug therapy. Inadequate use of pharmacologic agents plays a significant role in failure to achieve goal LDL for patients with CHD, without CHD, and with diabetes. Analysis of the data based on the new ADA guidelines for LDL demonstrates the need for continued vigilance. Finally, the successful merging of medical, laboratory, and pharmacy claims databases provides a benchmark for other institutions.

Study Objective: To evaluate the metabolism of antipyrine, a general metabolic probe, caffeine, a probe for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and N-acetyltransferase activity, and dextromethorphan, a specific probe for CYP2D6 activity in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus., Design: Prospective, controlled study., Setting: Research facility. Patients. Fifteen patients with type 1 and 16 with type 2 diabetes, and 16 healthy controls., Intervention: Each subject simultaneously received antipyrine 10 mg/kg, caffeine 100 mg, and dextromethorphan 30 mg., Measurements and Main Results: The pharmacokinetics of antipyrine and its primary metabolites were determined from saliva and urine samples. Type 1 diabetes had marked effects on antipyrine metabolism whereas type 2 disease did not alter the metabolism of any of the probe drugs. The apparent oral clearance of antipyrine was increased 72% in patients with type 1 disease compared with controls (p=0.0001). In addition, formation clearances of 4-hydroxyantipyrine and 3-hydroxymethylantipyrine were increased by 74% and 137% in those patients relative to controls. The caffeine metabolic index (paraxanthine/caffeine) was increased 34% (p=0.11), and N-acetylation and CYP2D6 phenotype were not altered., Conclusion: The metabolism of antipyrine is increased in patients with type 1 diabetes. Based on in vitro reports of antipyrine metabolism and current caffeine metabolic index data, the predominant effect of type 1 diabetes appears to be an increase in CYP1A2 activity. Assessment of the effect of the disease on other specific CYP metabolic pathways is warranted.

Study Objective: To assess the accuracy of patient-kept diaries relative to electronic monitoring of compliance with isosorbide dinitrate prescribed 3 times/day for ischemic heart disease., Design: Unblinded, prospective, three-phase study., Methods: Patients with coronary artery disease prescribed isosorbide dinitrate 3 times/day were asked to record the time of administration of each dose in a pocket diary while being monitored for compliance with a computerized Medication-Event Monitoring System (MEMS-4) vial that electronically recorded the date and time the vial was opened., Results: Sixty-eight stable outpatients with documented coronary artery disease who were prescribed isosorbide dinitrate 3 times/day were evaluated. Based on a prospectively chosen definition including a nitrate-free period, the mean (+/-SD) overall compliance rates were 71% (+/-30) versus 55% (+/-32) for the patient-kept diaries and the MEMS vials respectively (p = 0.001). The concordance between patient-kept diaries and MEMS data indicate that 67% of patients overestimate their compliance when using a self-recording tool. An average of 30% of diary entries were in error compared with the MEMS vial recordings., Conclusions: Patient-kept diaries statistically overestimate actual compliance relative to that determined by MEMS devices. Given the prevalence of the use of diaries as the predominant tool on which researchers depend to document compliance with study drugs, our findings suggest that this practice should be reevaluated specifically when the time of the dose and documentation of administration are critical to qualifying the outcome of drug therapy. Such is the case with isosorbide dinitrate use in patients with ischemic heart disease. Furthermore, the overall poor compliance documented in this study suggests that the utility of isosorbide dinitrate prescribed 3 times/day be reevaluated as a clinically effective antianginal drug.

Intravenous erythromycin has recently been associated with significant QTc interval prolongation, torsades de pointes, and sudden cardiac death. The prolonged the QTc interval attributed to erythromycin typically is associated with rapid infusion rates in excess of 10 mg/minute. We prospectively assessed the relationship between QTc interval prolongation and erythromycin administration by slow intravenous infusion (mean rate 8.9 +/- 3.5 mg/minute, range 3.9-16.7 mg/minute). Electrocardiographic (ECG) rhythm strips were prospectively obtained in 44 critically ill patients receiving intravenous antibiotics (22 received erythromycin and 22 ceftazidime, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, or ampicillin-sulbactam as controls). The ECG recordings were obtained immediately before and within 15 minutes after drug infusions. Only the first available set of ECG strips were evaluated. Two controls had evidence of hepatic dysfunction; no patients receiving erythromycin did. The QTc interval was calculated using Bazett's formula by two blinded investigators. For controls, mean +/- 1 SD (range) QTc intervals were 423 +/- 96 (300-550) msec at baseline and 419 +/- 96 (280-610) msec after infusion (p = 0.712). In contrast, in the erythromycin group, the interval was significantly prolonged from 524 +/- 105 (360-810) msec at baseline to 555 +/- 134 (400-980) msec after infusion (p = 0.034). No patients experienced a dysrhythmia as a consequence of erythromycin infusion. Despite slow rates of infusion, QTc interval prolongation was significant. The clinical importance of this finding remains to be determined.

The overuse and cost of drugs in long-term care facilities are of significant concern. To quantify potential overuse of antihypertensive agents, we conducted a retrospective chart review in four long-term care facilities. We analyzed data in 550 patient records to identify residents receiving drugs for the sole indication of hypertension. Of the 550 records, 49 (9%) residents qualified. Of these, 20 (41%) had all recorded blood pressures less than 140/90 mm Hg for the 6 months before review, and 32 (65%) had all blood pressures less than 160/90 mm Hg. Given this degree of blood pressure control and the reported success of withdrawing antihypertensive drugs from the elderly in whom the disorder is well controlled, a reevaluation of antihypertensive therapy in residents of long-term care facilities appears to be justified.