Search

The photophysical parameters for the photosensitizer Pd(II) meso-Tetra(4-carboxyphenyl) porphine (PdT790) acquired in a previous study were incorporated into the PDT oxygen diffusion models for cell suspensions and cell monolayers. The time-dependent phosphorescence signals generated by the diffusion models are shown to match signals previously measured by M.A.W. and M.S.P. when reasonable physical and photophysical parameters are used. Simulations were performed to investigate the effects of metabolic and photodynamic oxygen consumption rates on the PDT dose in each of the treatment geometries. It was found that in cell suspensions of <1 million cells per mL, PDT should not be inhibited by hypoxia if the photodynamic consumption rate is <1 mm s(-1). For cell monolayers the optimal photodynamic oxygen consumption rate was found to depend on the metabolic rate of oxygen consumption. If cells remained well oxygenated in the absence of PDT, then maximum PDT dose was delivered with the lowest practical photodynamic oxygen consumption rate. Simulations of PDT treatments for multicell tumor spheroids showed that large anoxic cores develop within the spheroids and, as a consequence, less PDT dose is delivered in comparison with similar treatments in cell suspensions and cell monolayers., (© 2014 The American Society of Photobiology.)

A technique is introduced that monitors the depletion of intracellular ground state oxygen concentration ([(3)O(2)]) during photodynamic therapy of Mat-LyLu cell monolayers and cell suspensions. The photosensitizer Pd(II) meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl)porphine (PdT790) is used to manipulate and indicate intracellular [(3)O(2)] in both of the in vitro models. The Stern-Volmer relationship for PdT790 phosphorescence was characterized in suspensions by flowing nitrogen over the suspension while short pulses of 405 nm light were used to excite the sensitizer. The bleaching of sensitizer and the oxygen consumption rate were also measured during continuous exposure of the cell suspension to the 405 nm laser. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was conducted in both cell suspensions and in cell monolayers under different treatment conditions while the phosphorescence signal was acquired. The intracellular [(3)O(2)] during PDT was calculated by using the measured Stern-Volmer relationship and correcting for sensitizer photobleaching. In addition, the amount of oxygen that was consumed during the treatments was calculated. It was found that even at large oxygen consumption rates, cells remain well oxygenated during PDT of cell suspensions. For monolayer treatments, it was found that intracellular [(3)O(2)] is rapidly depleted over the course of PDT., (© 2014 The American Society of Photobiology.)

To date, singlet oxygen ((1)O(2)) luminescence (SOL) detection was predictive of photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment responses both in vitro and in vivo, but accurate quantification is challenging. In particular, the early and strongest part of the time-resolved signal (500-2000ns) is difficult to separate from confounding sources of luminescence and system noise, and so is normally gated out. However, the signal dynamics change with oxygen depletion during PDT, so that this time gating biases the (1)O(2) measurements. Here, the impact of gating was investigated in detail, determining the rate constants from SOL and direct pO(2) measurements during meso-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC)-mediated PDT of cells in vitro under well-controlled conditions. With these data as input, numerical simulations were used to examine PDT and SOL dynamics, and the influence of various time gates on cumulative SOL signals. It is shown that gating can underestimate the SOL at early treatment time points by ∼40% and underestimate the cumulative SOL signal by 20-25%, representing significant errors. In vitro studies with both mTHPC and aminolevulinic acid-photosensitizer protoporphyrin IX demonstrate that rigorous analysis of SOL signal kinetics is then crucial in order to use SOL as an accurate and quantitative PDT dose metric., (© 2010 The Authors. Photochemistry and Photobiology © 2010 The American Society of Photobiology.)

Fluorescence photobleaching, photodynamic therapy (PDT) oxygen consumption and clonogenic cell survival were investigated during 2-(1-hexyloxethyl)-2-devinyl pyropheophoribde-a (HPPH) PDT of MAT-LyLu cells in vitro. Cells were incubated with HPPH concentrations of 0.24, 1.2, 3.6 or 12 microm for 4 h and then treated with 650 nm light under oxygenated and hypoxic conditions. Fluorescence spectra were acquired during treatment and photobleaching was quantified using singular value decomposition of the spectra. Cell survival was measured at set times during the treatment using a colony forming assay. Intracellular fluorescence lifetime measurements were also performed at each incubation concentration. The photobleaching kinetics did not follow first- or second-order kinetics and the fluorescence lifetime was similar for all intracellular concentrations. As the intracellular concentration of drug was increased, the amount of singlet oxygen and the absorbed quanta per cell required to achieve the same cell kill increased. Singlet oxygen dose was calculated using one- and two-compartment models of HPPH intracellular distribution. It was found that a two-compartment model, in which a PDT-sensitive binding site saturates at low concentrations, accounts for the observed photobleaching, oxygen consumption and cell survival.

It has been suggested that combination high dose rate (HDR) intraluminal brachytherapy and photodynamic therapy (PDT) in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may improve efficacy of treatment, reduce toxicity and enhance quality of life for patients. To provide a cellular basis for this we examined the in vitro sensitivity of MRC5 normal lung fibroblasts and four NSCLC cell lines following HDR radiation, PDT and combined HDR radiation and PDT. HDR radiation was cobalt-60 gamma rays (1.5-1.9 Gy min(-1)). For PDT treatment, cells were exposed to 2.5 microg mL(-1) Photofrin for 18-24 h followed by light exposure (20 mW cm(-2)). For combined treatment cells were exposed to Photofrin and then either exposed to light and 15-30 min later exposed to HDR radiation or exposed to HDR radiation and 15-30 min later exposed to light. D(37) values calculated from clonogenic survival curves indicated a six-fold difference in HDR radiation sensitivity and an eight-fold difference in PDT sensitivity. The effect of combined treatment was not significantly different from an additive effect of the individual treatment modalities for the NSCLC cells, but was significantly less than additive for the MRC5 cells. These results suggest an equivalent tumor cell kill may be possible at reduced systemic effects to patients.