Search

Background: This in vitro study was designed to compare the assessment of carious root surfaces using laser fluorescence or visual assessment and µCT., Methods: A total of 107 extracted human teeth were included in the study. For the subsequent assessment, a clinical evaluation according to Ekstrand and Nyvad criteria, laser fluorescence measurements (DIAGNOdent-Pen©), and µCT imaging (Bruker Skyscan 1172) of the included root surfaces were performed. For cavitated lesions, the surface was reconstructed on µCT. Target parameters were: clinical appearance, laser fluorescence reading (0-99), and lesion depth in µm (µCT). The statistical analysis included chi² and Spearman-Rho tests., Results: Laser fluorescence values were significantly higher (p < 0.01) in leathery non-cavitated (median [IQR]: 73.50 [48.00]) and cavitated (88.50 [29.00]) surfaces than in hard intact surfaces (7.00 [35.00]). In addition, laser fluorescence values showed a significant correlation with lesion depth for non-cavitated surfaces (0.750; p < 0.01). Further statistically significant correlations were not detectable. Regression analysis showed that the laser fluorescence values increased with increasing demineralization depth (β: 0.648, CI95: 0.631-1.053; p < 0.01)., Conclusion: Laser fluorescence measured by DIAGNOdent© is a predictor for the depth of demineralization in carious root caries lesions with intact surfaces. Considering the limitations of this in vitro study, laser fluorescence is suitable for assessing the depth extent of (non-cavitated) root caries lesions and is a tool for clinical diagnosing and assessing the course of lesion development., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest in this manuscript., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: This in vitro study aimed to assess carious lesions on root surfaces using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) and to compare the readings with axial lesion depth on µCT., Methods: The root surfaces of 107 extracted human teeth were included after visual-tactile inspection. For further analysis, the following parameters were assessed: clinical findings (non-cavitated: leathery or hard, cavitated), QLF- (QLF-D Biluminator 2+), and µCT-images (Bruker Skyscan 1172). The shape of the undamaged tooth surface of the cavitated lesions was virtually re-constructed during µCT analysis. Clinical surface texture,% fluorescence loss, and lesion depth (µCT) were determined., Statistical Analysis: chi²-test, Spearman-Rho test, regression analysis., Results: ∆F was significantly lower in non-cavitated leathery (-50.37 ± 15.10) and cavitated (-61.23 ± 9.92) compared to non-cavitated surfaces with a hard texture (-17.04 ± 16.10, p < 0.01). For non-cavitated surfaces, a negative correlation was observed between ∆F and lesion depth in µCT images regardless of texture (-0.748, p < 0.01). Regression analysis revealed that ∆F predicted lesion depth in µCT for non-cavitated surfaces (β: 0.703, CI95: 0.67--0.43, p < 0.01)., Conclusion: The percentage of fluorescence loss (∆F) in QLF predicted lesion depth of non-cavitated demineralized root surfaces. Therefore, QLF can be recommended for estimating the lesion depth of carious root lesions and seems to expand the possibilities of follow-up and lesion monitoring, especially for non-cavitated surfaces., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the reproducibility of quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) for the detection and assessment of demineralization states of non-cavitated root surfaces and to determine the correlation between visual inspection and QLF-analysis., Methods: 46 exposed non-cavitated root surfaces of 12 participants were classified in three scores: sound (0), lesion ≤ 5 mm (1a), lesion > 5 mm in diameter (1b). Three examiners imaged every root surface three times using QLF (QRayCam) and measured fluorescence loss (ΔF) and lesion volume (ΔQ). The QLF-images were analyzed by three examiners. The intra- and interexaminer reproducibilities were calculated (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC). The correlation between the scores of root caries and QLF-analysis was determined (rank correlation coefficient, Spearman-Rho ρ)., Results: Intra- and interexaminer reproducibility (ICC) was 0.98 and 0.95 for ΔF, 0.94 and 0.91 for ΔQ, respectively. A significant correlation was observed between the scores and ΔF (ρ = -0.53, p < 0.01)., Conclusion: QLF as a reproducible diagnostic tool enables non-invasive detection and differentiation of non-cavitated root caries lesions on root surfaces in vivo. It can be recommended in addition to the clinical evaluation for prospective follow-up examinations of demineralization states of exposed root surfaces., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)