1. Magnetic characteristics of polymorphic single crystal compounds DyIr2Si2
- Author
-
Yoshiya Uwatoko, Toru Shigeoka, and Kiyoharu Uchima
- Subjects
Materials science ,Magnetic domain ,Magnetic moment ,Condensed matter physics ,Transition temperature ,02 engineering and technology ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,Condensed Matter Physics ,01 natural sciences ,Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials ,Paramagnetism ,Magnetic anisotropy ,Magnetization ,0103 physical sciences ,Antiferromagnetism ,Electrical and Electronic Engineering ,010306 general physics ,0210 nano-technology ,Metamagnetism - Abstract
We have confirmed that the tetragonal ternary compound DyIr2Si2 shows polymorphism; the ThCr2Si2-type structure as a low temperature phase (I-phase) and the CaBe2Ge2-type one as a high temperature phase (P-phase) exist. A comparative study on magnetic characteristics of the morphs was performed on the I- and P-phase single crystals in order to elucidate how magnetic properties are influenced by crystallographic symmetry. The magnetic behavior changes drastically depending on the structure. The DyIr2Si2(I) shows an antiferromagnetic ordering below TN = 30 K, additional magnetic transitions of T1 = 17 K and T2 = 10 K, and a strong uniaxial magnetic anisotropy with the easy [001] direction. The [001] magnetization shows four metamagnetic transitions at low temperatures. On the other hand, the DyIr2Si2(P) has comparatively low ordering temperature of TN1 = 9.4 K and an additional transition temperature of TN2 = 3.0 K, and exhibits an easy-plane magnetic anisotropy with the easy [110] direction. Two metamagnetic transitions appear in the basal plane magnetization processes. In both the morphs, the χ-T behavior suggests the existence of component-separated magnetic transitions. The ab-component of magnetic moments orders at the higher transition temperature TN1 for the P-phase compound, which is contrast to the I-phase behavior; the c-component orders firstly at TN. The crystalline electric field (CEF) analysis was made, and the difference in magnetic behaviors between both the morphs is explained by the CEF effects.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF