Search

Objective . To combat the motion artifacts present in traditional 4D-CBCT reconstruction, an iterative technique known as the motion-compensated simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (MC-SART) was previously developed. MC-SART employs a 4D-CBCT reconstruction to obtain an initial model, which suffers from a lack of sufficient projections in each bin. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of introducing a motion model acquired during CT simulation to MC-SART, coined model-based CBCT (MB-CBCT). Approach . For each of 5 patients, we acquired 5DCTs during simulation and pre-treatment CBCTs with a simultaneous breathing surrogate. We cross-calibrated the 5DCT and CBCT breathing waveforms by matching the diaphragms and employed the 5DCT motion model parameters for MC-SART. We introduced the Amplitude Reassignment Motion Modeling technique, which measures the ability of the model to control diaphragm sharpness by reassigning projection amplitudes with varying resolution. We evaluated the sharpness of tumors and compared them between MB-CBCT and 4D-CBCT. We quantified sharpness by fitting an error function across anatomical boundaries. Furthermore, we compared our MB-CBCT approach to the traditional MC-SART approach. We evaluated MB-CBCT's robustness over time by reconstructing multiple fractions for each patient and measuring consistency in tumor centroid locations between 4D-CBCT and MB-CBCT. Main results . We found that the diaphragm sharpness rose consistently with increasing amplitude resolution for 4/5 patients. We observed consistently high image quality across multiple fractions, and observed stable tumor centroids with an average 0.74 ± 0.31 mm difference between the 4D-CBCT and MB-CBCT. Overall, vast improvements over 3D-CBCT and 4D-CBCT were demonstrated by our MB-CBCT technique in terms of both diaphragm sharpness and overall image quality. Significance . This work is an important extension of the MC-SART technique. We demonstrated the ability of a priori 5DCT models to provide motion compensation for CBCT reconstruction. We showed improvements in image quality over both 4D-CBCT and the traditional MC-SART approach., (© 2024 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.)

The advent of technologies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiation therapy has led to the need for phantom materials that are capable of producing tissue-like contrast on both MRI and computed tomography (CT) imaging modalities. The purpose of this work is to develop a system of easily made and formed materials with adjustable T 1 and T 2 relaxation times, and x-ray attenuation properties, for mimicking soft tissue and bone with both MRI and CT imaging modalities. The effects on T 1 /T 2 relaxation times and CT numbers were quantified for a range of gadolinium contrast (0-25 μmol g -1 ), agarose (0%-8% w/w), glass microspheres (0%-10% w/w) and CaCO 3 (0%-50% w/w) concentrations in a carrageenan-based gel. 105 gel samples were prepared with the additives, carrageenan and water. Samples were imaged in a 3D-printed holding structure to find the attainable range of T 1 /T 2 relaxation time and CT number combinations. T 1 and T 2 relaxation time maps were generated using voxel-wise inversion-recovery and spin-echo techniques, respectively. A multivariate linear regression model was generated to allow the materials system to be generalized to semi-arbitrary T 1 /T 2 relaxation times and CT numbers. Nine diverse tissue types were mimicked for fit model validation. The achievable T 1 /T 2 relaxation times and CT numbers for the additive concentrations tested in this study spanned from 82 to 2180 ms, 12 to 475 ms, and -117 to +914 Hounsfield units (HU), respectively. The mean absolute error between the fit model predicted and measured T 1 /T 2 relaxation times and CT numbers for the nine tested tissue types was 113 ± 64 ms, 16 ± 26 ms and 11 ± 14 HU, respectively. In conclusion, we have created a system of materials capable of producing tissue-like contrast for 3.0 T MRI and CT imaging modalities.

To objectively compare the suitability of MRI pulse sequences and commercially available fiducial markers (FMs) for MRI-only prostate radiotherapy simulation. Most FMs appear as small signal voids in MRI images making them difficult to differentiate from tissue heterogeneities such as calcifications. In this study we use quantitative metrics to objectively evaluate the visibility of FMs in 27 patients and an anthropomorphic phantom with a variety of standard clinical MRI pulse sequences and commercially available FMs. FM visibility was quantified using the local contrast-to-noise-ratio (lCNR), the difference between the 80th and 20th percentile iso-intensity FM volumes (V fall ) and the largest iso-intensity volume that can be distinguished from background: apparent-marker-volume (AMV). A larger lCNR and AMV, and smaller V fall represents a more easily identifiable FM. The number of non-marker objects visualized by each pulse sequence was calculated using FM-derived template-matching. The FM-based target-registration-error (TRE) between each MRI and the planning-CT image was calculated. Fiducial marker visibility was rated by two medical physicists with over three years of experience examining MRI-only prostate simulation images. The rater's classification accuracy was quantified using the F 1 score, which is the harmonic mean of the rater's precision and recall. These quantitative metrics and human observer ratings were used to evaluate FM identifiability in images from nine subtypes of T 1 -weighted, T 2 -weighted and gradient echo (GRE) pulse sequences in a 27-patient study. A phantom study was conducted to quantify the visibility of 8 commercially available FMs. In the patient study, the largest mean lCNR and AMV and, smallest normalized V fall were produced by the 3.0 T multiple-echo GRE pulse sequence (T 1 -VIBE, 2° flip angle, 1.23 ms and 2.45 ms echo-times). This pulse sequence produced no false marker detections and TREs less than 2 mm in the left-right, anterior-posterior and cranial-caudal directions, respectively. Human observers rated the 1.23 ms echo-time GRE images with the best average marker visibility score of 100% and an F 1 score of 1. In the phantom study, the Gold-Anchor GA-200X-20-B (deployed in a folded configuration) produced the largest sequence averaged lCNR and AMV measurements at 16.1 and 16.7 mm 3 , respectively. Using quantitative visibility and distinguishability metrics and human observer ratings, the patient study demonstrated that multiple-echo GRE images produced the best gold FM visibility and distinguishability. The phantom study demonstrated that markers manufactured from platinum or iron-doped gold quantitatively produced superior visibility compared to their pure gold counterparts.

4D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of the thorax and abdomen can have reduced quality due to the limited number of projections per respiratory bin used in gated image reconstruction. In this work, we present a new algorithm to reconstruct high quality CBCT images by simultaneously reconstructing images and generating an associated respiratory motion model. This is done by updating model parameters to compensate for motion during the iterative image reconstruction process. CBCT image acquisition was simulated using the digital eXternal CArdiac Torso (XCAT) phantom, simulating breathing motion using four patient breathing traces. 4DCBCT images were reconstructed using the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART), and compared to the proposed motion-compensated SART (McSART) algorithm. McSART used a motion model that describes tissue position as a function of diaphragm amplitude and velocity. The McSART algorithm alternately updated the motion model and image reconstruction, increasing the number of projections used for image reconstruction with every iteration. The model was able to interpolate and extrapolate deformations according to the magnitude of the surrogate signal. Without noise, the final iteration McSART images had HU errors at 31%, 34%, and 44% of their SART-reconstructed counterparts compared to ground truth XCAT images, with corresponding root-mean-square (RMS) motion model errors of 0.75 mm, 1.08 mm, and 1.17 mm respectively. With added image noise, McSART's HU error was 31% of the SART-reconstructed 4DCBCT error, with a 1.43 mm RMS motion model error. Qualitatively, blurring and streaking artifacts were reduced in all the reconstructed images compared to 3D or SART-reconstructed 4DCBCT. The output of the algorithm was a high quality reference image and a corresponding motion model, that could be used to deform the reference image to any other point in a breathing cycle.