Search

Background and Purpose. Physiotherapists' use of research evidence with clinical decision-making has interested researchers world-wide since 1980; however, little is known about such practices in Australia. The present survey sought information on Australian physiotherapists' perceptions of the importance of research, and barriers to uptake of evidence in clinical practice, when compared with an international cohort from 2001. Method. An Australian-relevant version of an English (UK) National Health Service (NHS) survey instrument was used to canvass 453 physiotherapists, randomly selected from the South Australian Physiotherapy Registration Board 2004–2005 records. The first survey was mailed in August 2005, a reminder was sent two weeks later to non-responders and a follow-up survey was sent in April 2006 to non-responders whose addresses had changed since 2005. Results. There was a 51% response rate. Of the non-responders, 12% were not contactable at their listed address, highlighting the mobility of Australian physiotherapists. Most respondents had undertaken research as students (59.5%) or as students and clinicians (11.5%). Of these, 37.1% were encouraged to embark on more research, and 20.5% were discouraged. The significant predictors of positive perceived importance of research were: previous research experience; being positive about undertaking further research; working in hospitals and holding a postgraduate degree. Clinicians working privately were significantly less likely than managers to be positive about research importance. The only significant predictor for not perceiving barriers to uptake of evidence was being positive about undertaking future research. Conclusions. The study identified constraints on uptake of evidence into practice that were related to accessing, reading and interpreting published research, and implementing findings. Found consistently across employment categories were barriers relating to lack of time, uncertainty about what the research reported, scepticism about the value of research and being isolated from peer support and literature sources. The responses indicated a positive shift towards evidence uptake since the 2001 NHS survey, suggesting an influence of increased exposure to information on evidence-based practice. A greater focus on research whilst training, the application of educational strategies for empowerment, better knowledge transfer and upskilling within the workplace, and ensuring dedicated time and organizational support for research activities are indicated. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Background and Purpose The present paper explores aspects of a large dataset of adolescent potentiates of low back pain. Standing, trunk and shoulder height, subischial height, weight and mean leg length are examined in relation to reports of low back pain in the last two weeks, in strata of age and gender. Method The present study examined 1254 adolescents, aged 11–18 years, drawn from 12 Adelaide public high schools during 1998. Results At each year of age, girls reported significantly more low back pain than boys. Girls and boys at each year of age provided different relationships between low back pain and anthropometric features, highlighting the unique nature of adolescent growth. The most consistent findings were anthropometric differences between 16-year-old boys, and 13- and 15-year-old girls, with and without low back pain, who may be at critical stages of the peak growth curve. Conclusion We suggest a high prevalence of low back pain in adolescents, and that young sufferers with low back pain may be reflecting attributes of their stage of anthropometric growth. Copyright © 2001 Whurr Publishers Ltd.