Search

Background and aims: Determining which strategies confer a competitive advantage in variable environments with strong short-term resource fluctuations (i.e., seasonal drought and flooding) is critical for understanding ecosystem structure and function, and predicting how ecosystems will respond to global change. Here, we ask how functional traits of plant species vary in response to drought and flooding and whether trait plasticity is a better predictor of plants' cover than average functional trait values. Methods: We transplanted vegetative recruits (similar size and age) of eight common species from a moderately grazed alpine wetland in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau to a common garden where we evaluated the trait responses of these species to drought and flooding. We also measured the coverage, biomass, and height of these plant species in the field communities. Results: The leaf morphological and physiological traits of these eight species generally showed different responses to drought and flood conditions. Variation (plasticity) of leaf morphological or physiological traits rather than average values of these traits were better predictors of cover and biomass in the field community. Species with lower plasticity in leaf morphological traits had higher plasticity in leaf physiology and the higher coverage and biomass in the field community. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the ability to quickly adjust leaf physiology to changing environmental conditions provides an advantage in this ecosystem, where intra-annual rainfall variability is high and thus resource fluctuations are pulsed in time. In contrast, greater functional trait plasticity in leaf morphology was a disadvantage, possibly because the benefits of these adjustments did not outweigh their initial costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]