Search

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term patient satisfaction and quality of life 9 to 13 years after autologous versus alloplastic breast reconstruction and compare the data to those of an earlier study.Methods: This is a 9-year follow-up study of 92 women who underwent breast reconstruction (47 autologous and 45 alloplastic) between 2006 and 2010 and filled out the BREAST-Q questionnaire in 2010. Changes in BREAST-Q scores were analyzed by using a change score from baseline (2010) to follow-up (2019), which was presented by a mean change score with 95% confidence intervals. Linear regression analyses were performed to test which patient characteristics were related to the BREAST-Q change scores.Results: The response rate at follow-up was 60% (25 autologous and 30 alloplastic). Responders at follow-up had a lower body mass index and had less frequently undergone unilateral breast reconstruction compared to the nonresponders. Women undergoing both autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction had significantly decreased satisfaction with breasts (-4 points), satisfaction with outcome (-8 points), and satisfaction with nipples (-20 points) over time. None of the patient characteristics, including reconstruction technique, were related to the BREAST-Q change scores.Conclusions: Satisfaction with breasts, satisfaction with outcome, and satisfaction with nipples decreased slightly over time for women undergoing alloplastic and autologous breast reconstruction. Women undergoing autologous breast reconstruction seemed to remain more satisfied with their breasts 9 to 13 years after breast reconstruction compared to women undergoing alloplastic breast reconstruction. Because of the small sample size, conclusions should be carefully drawn. However, the results were in line with the expectations based on previous literature.

Background: This review aimed to meta-analyze the quality of life of alloplastic versus autologous breast reconstruction, when measured with the BREAST-Q. Methods: An electronic PubMed and EMBASE search was designed to find articles that compared alloplastic versus autologous breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q. Studies that failed to present BREAST-Q scores and studies that did not compare alloplastic versus autologous breast reconstruction were excluded. Two authors independently extracted data from the included studies. A standardized data collection form was used. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The mean difference and 95 percent confidence intervals between breast reconstruction means were estimated for each BREAST-Q subscale. Forest plots and the I2statistic were used to assess heterogeneity and funnel plot publication bias. The Z test was used to assess overall effects. Results: Two hundred eighty abstracts were found; 10 articles were included. Autologous breast reconstruction scored significantly higher in the five subscales than alloplastic breast reconstruction. The Satisfaction with Breasts subscale indicated the greatest difference, with a mean difference of 6.41 (95 percent CI, 3.58 to 9.24; I2= 70 percent). The Satisfaction with Results subscale displayed a mean difference of 5.52. The Sexual Well-Being subscale displayed a mean difference of 3.85. The Psychosocial Well-Being subscale displayed a mean difference of 2.64. The overall difference in physical well-being was significant, with high heterogeneity (mean difference, 3.33; 95 percent CI, 0.18 to 6.48; I2= 85). Conclusion: Autologous breast reconstruction had superior outcomes compared with alloplastic breast reconstruction as measured by the BREAST-Q.