Search

Background In late presentation of brachial plexus trauma, it is unclear whether donor nerves should be devoted to nerve reconstruction or reserved for free functional muscle transfer. The authors systematically reviewed recovery of elbow flexion after nerve reconstruction versus free functional muscle transfer for late, traumatic brachial plexus palsy. Methods A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify all cases of traumatic brachial plexus palsy in patients aged 18 years or older. Patients who underwent late (≥12 months) nerve reconstruction or free functional muscle transfer for elbow flexion were included. Age, time to operation, and level of brachial plexus injury were recorded. British Medical Research Council grade for strength and range of motion were evaluated for elbow flexion. Results Thirty-three studies met criteria, for a total of 103 patients (nerve reconstruction, n = 53; free functional muscle transfer, n = 50). There were no differences across groups regarding surgical age (time from injury) and preoperative elbow flexion. For upper trunk injuries, 53 percent of reconstruction patients versus 100 percent of muscle transfer patients achieved grade M3 or greater strength, and 43 percent of reconstruction patients versus 70 percent of muscle transfer patients achieved grade M4 or greater strength. Of the total brachial plexus injuries, 37 percent of reconstruction patients versus 78 percent of muscle transfer patients achieved grade M3 or greater strength, and 16 percent of reconstruction patients versus 46 percent of muscle transfer patients achieved grades M4 or greater strength. Conclusion In late presentation of traumatic brachial plexus injuries, donor nerves should be reserved for free functional muscle transfer to restore elbow flexion. Clinical question/level of evidence Therapeutic, IV.

Upper trunk obstetric brachial plexus injury can cause profound shoulder and elbow dysfunction. Although neuroma excision with interpositional sural nerve grafting is the current gold standard, distal nerve transfers have a number of potential advantages. The goal of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and health care costs between nerve grafting and distal nerve transfers in children with upper trunk obstetric brachial plexus injury.In this prospective cohort study, children who underwent triple nerve transfers were followed with the Active Movement Scale for 2 years. Their outcomes were compared to those of children who underwent nerve graft reconstruction. To assess health care use, a cost analysis was also performed.Twelve patients who underwent nerve grafting were compared to 14 patients who underwent triple nerve transfers. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics and showed improved shoulder and elbow function following surgery. However, the nerve transfer group displayed significantly greater improvement in shoulder external rotation and forearm supination 2 years after surgery (p0.05). The operative time and length of hospital stay were significantly lower (p0.05), and the overall cost was approximately 50 percent less in the nerve transfer group.Triple nerve transfer for upper trunk obstetric brachial plexus injury is a feasible option, with better functional shoulder external rotation and forearm supination, faster recovery, and lower cost compared with traditional nerve graft reconstruction.Therapeutic, II.

Background Reconstruction of the anterior thorax is complex because of the presence of aesthetically important areas such as the breast, sternum, and upper abdomen. For this reason, a wide variety of pedicled perforator flaps have been described. The anterior intercostal perforator flap is one of these perforators flaps and is valuable for use in breast reconstruction surgery. Methods The location and characteristics of the anterior intercostal perforators were evaluated both anatomically and radiologically. The anatomical study was conducted in a set of 14 hemitrunk cadavers, and the radiologic study was performed retrospectively from a randomly selected set of images obtained from 30 female patients who underwent thoracic computed tomographic angiography for other health problems at the authors' institution during the year 2015. The findings were then compared. Results A total of 60 perforators in 14 hemitrunks were identified and mapped. Perforators were found in all hemithoraces. The lateral third donor location was the most reliable zone, containing larger and more numerous perforators compared with the other donor regions. According to the radiologic study, a total of 164 perforators in 30 computed tomographic angiographs were identified and mapped. Perforators were found in all thoraxes. Conclusions The authors found that the intercostal perforator flap has a consistent vascularization. Computed tomographic angiography is less reliable than dissection in identifying the number of perforators. The authors' findings suggest that intercostal perforator flaps are reliable and consistent flaps for reconstruction of the upper trunk.

Background The goal of this study was to clarify the anatomical origins of the suprascapular and lateral pectoral nerves from the brachial plexus as an aid to surgical exploration. Methods Both nerves were studied in 100 adult cadaver specimens. Topographic points of origin were described as distance from the bifurcation of the upper trunk or distance from the formation point of the lateral cord, using visual anatomical models. Results The suprascapular nerve originated from (1) the posterior division of the upper trunk distal to the bifurcation of the upper trunk (61 specimens); (2) the point of upper trunk bifurcation (29 cases); (3) the upper trunk proximal to the bifurcation point (six cases); and (4) directly from the C5 root (four cases). The lateral pectoral nerve originated from (1) the anterior division of the upper trunk proximal to the point of lateral cord formation (88 cases); (2) the point of lateral cord formation (five cases); (3) the lateral cord distal to the lateral cord formation point (four cases); and (4) the anterior division of the middle trunk (three cases). Eighty-two cases had origins from both the anterior upper trunk and the anterior middle trunk. Conclusions The suprascapular nerve most frequently originates from the posterior division of the upper trunk, and the lateral pectoral nerve from the anterior divisions of the upper and middle trunks. This information can be used to guide the surgeon in identifying the key landmarks of the supraclavicular brachial plexus at surgical exploration.

Current surgical management of obstetrical brachial plexus injury is primary reconstruction with sural nerve grafts. Recently, the nerve-to-nerve transfer technique has been used to treat brachial plexus injury in adults, affording the benefit of distal coaptations that minimize regenerative distance. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that nerve transfers are effective in reconstructing isolated upper trunk obstetrical brachial plexus injuries.Ten patients aged 10 to 18 months were treated with three nerve transfers: spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve for shoulder abduction and external rotation; a radial to axillary nerve for shoulder abduction; and ulnar or median nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve for elbow flexion. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using the Active Movement Scale. All patients were followed regularly for up to 2 years.Improvement in elbow and shoulder function was observed between 6 and 24 months. By 6 months, all patients passed the cookie test. At 24 months, shoulder abduction improved from 3.7 ± 0.6 to 5.0 ± 0.5, shoulder external rotation from 1.8 ± 0.4 to 4.3 ± 0.6, shoulder flexion from 3.7 ± 0.5 to 5.4 ± 0.5, elbow flexion from 3.7 ± 0.6 to 6.3 ± 0.2, and forearm supination from 2.1 ± 0.4 to 5.9 ± 0.2. There was no clinically appreciable donor-site morbidity.Nerve transfers reduced operative times compared with traditional nerve grafting procedures. Those patients showed significant gains in Active Movement Scale score by 24 months postoperatively, comparable to results achieved by nerve grafting. These findings support nerve transfers as a potential alternative treatment option for upper trunk obstetrical brachial plexus injuries.Therapeutic, IV.

Restoration of elbow flexion is commonly achieved with nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve branches after upper trunk brachial plexus injury. It is unknown if double nerve transfer to the biceps and brachialis nerve branches results in greater strength than single nerve transfer to the biceps branch alone.A retrospective review was performed of all patients receiving nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion. Single and double nerve transfers were compared in regard to severity of injury, elbow flexion, supination, grip strengths, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Elbow flexion and supination torque strength were measured quantitatively.Fifty-five patients underwent nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion (23 single, 32 double). At similar follow-up periods, British Medical Research Council grade improved to 4 or better in 14 of 21 single and 24 of 30 double nerve transfer patients. Supination strength was similar between groups (p = 0.148). Grip strength was greater in the double nerve transfer patients (p = 0.028). Preoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were significantly greater in single versus double nerve transfer patients (p = 0.018). Although single nerve transfer patients had a greater improvement in scores, the final mean scores were similar in the two groups. The severity of injury was different between the two groups, with 19 of 23 single nerve transfer patients having injury beyond the C5-6 level and only 16 of 32 of double nerve transfer patients with greater than C5-6 injury (p = 0.020).Outcomes are similar between the two groups for elbow flexion and supination strength. Postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores are similar in single and double nerve transfer patients.

Background: Strategies for management of infant obstetrical brachial plexus palsy remain controversial, including timing of surgery and treatment modalities. Methods: The senior author (Chuang) performed surgical explorations on 78 infant obstetrical brachial plexus palsy patients from 1992 to 1999. Sixty-eight patients underwent brachial plexus operation during the infant period (2 to 11 months), and 10 patients underwent surgery beyond the infant period. Results: For the ruptured upper and/or middle trunk injury (Erb’s palsy), better shoulder and elbow function was observed in those who received numerous short grafts from C5 to the suprascapular and posterior division and from the C6 spinal nerve to the anterior division of the upper trunk. For the rupture injury associated with root avulsion (total palsy), nerve graft and transfer (intraplexus and extraplexus) provided a one-stage reconstruction for shoulder, elbow, and especially hand functions. The contralateral C7 or ipsilateral part of the ulnar nerve transfer was rarely used in infant obstetrical brachial plexus palsy, compared with adult brachial plexus injury. Conclusions: The operative results proved that earlier timing of nerve surgery (within 3 months) is strongly indicated in patients who have total palsy, and only relatively indicated in patients with isolated rupture of the upper plexus.

The vascular territory of the pectoralis major muscle and overlying skin was studied by selective intraarterial dye injections in fresh cadavers. The area of skin overlying the anterior chest and abdominal wall beyond the limits of the pectoralis major muscle that can be elevated as an extended myocutaneous flap was determined. The cadaver injections were evaluated to determine the size and shape of the skin island used to reconstruct defects of the head, neck, and upper trunk with an extended skin paddle off the pectoralis major muscle. Pectoralis muscle flaps with variously shaped skin paddles, some extending beyond the limits of the muscle, were used in 27 patients to cover large soft-tissue defects of the upper thorax, face, and floor of the mouth and as a skin tube to reconstruct the cervical esophagus. The size of the skin paddle ranged from 5 x 7 cm to 26 x 16 cm. All flaps survived completely, and there were no major donor-site complications.