Search

Autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction has become a standard of care. As techniques become more individualized and aim for less-invasive approaches, vessels ever smaller in diameter are considered for flap anastomosis. Robot-assisted surgery has great potential to reduce tremor and enhance precise motion. The Symani Surgical System (Medical Microinstruments, Inc., Wilmington, Del.) is a robotic platform designed for microsurgery. It was used for a microsurgical in-flap anastomosis of a bipedicular deep inferior epigastric artery flap for unilateral breast reconstruction. The procedure included fully robot-assisted anastomoses with significant size mismatches using a 3D-exoscope for magnification. Arterial and venous anastomoses were entirely robot-assisted completed in 23 minutes (seven stitches) and 28 minutes (eight stitches) using 9/0 nylon sutures. The intra- and postoperative course was uneventful. This robotic platform facilitates in-flap anastomoses of small vessels by increasing the precision of instrument handling and eliminating tremor. The combination of robotic platforms and exoscopes provides superior ergonomics in comparison with conventional (super)microsurgery. We expect robotic platforms to play a significant role in modern microsurgical breast reconstruction., Competing Interests: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: The usage of internal mammary artery perforators (IMAPs) has been described in autologous breast reconstruction although IMAPS are not yet considered standard recipient vessels. It remains unclear if these vessels can be safely used in large flaps after radiation therapy or in delayed breast reconstruction., Methods: Over a 2-year period, 515 free flaps for autologous breast reconstruction were performed on 419 patients by 2 surgeons (S1 and S2). In a retrospective analysis, time of reconstruction, ischemia time, flap weight, diameter of couplers, and complications were analyzed. All 515 flaps were compared in a subset with regard to the 2 surgeons: S1 who always used the IMA as a recipient vessel and S2 who attempted IMAP use if possible., Results: Of all 515 flaps, 424 were abdominal flaps and 91 flaps were from the upper thigh. Three hundred six cases were immediate reconstructions, and 112 were delayed reconstructions. In 97 cases, implants were converted to autologous tissue. In 112 cases, the IMAPs were used; of these, 82 were immediate and 17 were delayed reconstructions, and in 13 cases, implants were removed. Thirty-five percent of all anastomoses to IMAPs had previous radiation therapy. The flap failure rate was 1.9%. In none of these cases, the IMAPs were used. S1 never used the IMAP, and S2 used the IMAP in 37% of all of his flaps., Conclusions: IMAPs were safely used in all kinds of reconstructions and after radiation therapy, with no flap failure or negative effects on mastectomy skin flap perfusion. Using the IMAPs as recipient vessels is a further step toward simplifying microsurgical breast reconstruction.