Search

The article presents several rules for restructuring papers to avoid losing readers. Authors are instructed to focus their papers on a central contribution and to concentrate on the context-content-conclusion (C-C-C) scheme. They are also advised to optimize a paper's logical flow by avoiding zig-zag and using parallelism and to include complete story in the abstract.

While women are generally underrepresented in STEM fields, there are noticeable differences between fields. For instance, the gender ratio in biology is more balanced than in computer science. We were interested in how this difference is reflected in the interdisciplinary field of computational/quantitative biology. To this end, we examined the proportion of female authors in publications from the PubMed and arXiv databases. There are fewer female authors on research papers in computational biology, as compared to biology in general. This is true across authorship position, year, and journal impact factor. A comparison with arXiv shows that quantitative biology papers have a higher ratio of female authors than computer science papers, placing computational biology in between its two parent fields in terms of gender representation. Both in biology and in computational biology, a female last author increases the probability of other authors on the paper being female, pointing to a potential role of female PIs in influencing the gender balance.

The article presents ten simple rules for scientific writing. Topics discussed include priority to be given for shorter abstracts, use of present tense, avoiding adjectives and adverbs, keeping sentences or phrasing short and breaking compound sentences into simpler sentences, and use of plain language rather than technical terms.

The article focuses on main points to be considered by a budding author while writing a book. It is advised to write a complete draft, put it in a drawer, then forget about it while writing a good novel. It is recommended to find the right topic for the book and it is better if the topic is timely and new.

The article presents rules for writing a proposal for a career development grant. Applicants are advised to have three months of full-time effort for completing the application, to use the review criteria as a guide for writing a proposal and to write a clear and concise proposal. The importance of having a mentoring team during the proposed funding program is discussed.