11 results
Search Results
2. Ten simple rules for structuring papers.
- Author
-
Mensh B and Kording K
- Subjects
- Algorithms, Documentation methods, Periodicals as Topic, Research organization & administration, Science organization & administration, Writing
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Ten simple rules for reading a scientific paper
- Author
-
William A. Petri, Kevin L Steiner, and Maureen A. Carey
- Subjects
Science and Technology Workforce ,Economics ,Social Sciences ,Scientific literature ,Careers in Research ,Key (music) ,Habits ,Learning and Memory ,Sociology ,Reading (process) ,Psychology ,Biology (General) ,media_common ,Simple (philosophy) ,Textbooks ,Ecology ,Library card ,Careers ,Publications ,Research Assessment ,Professions ,Editorial ,Computational Theory and Mathematics ,Modeling and Simulation ,Research Reporting Guidelines ,Educational Status ,Periodicals as Topic ,Employment ,QH301-705.5 ,Science Policy ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Research and Analysis Methods ,Education ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,Level of Effort ,Human Learning ,Genetics ,Mathematics education ,Learning ,Early career ,Molecular Biology ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Publishing ,Behavior ,Research ,Cognitive Psychology ,Biology and Life Sciences ,Advice (programming) ,Reading ,Labor Economics ,People and Places ,Scientists ,Cognitive Science ,Population Groupings ,Undergraduates ,Neuroscience - Abstract
“There is no problem that a library card can't solve” according to author Eleanor Brown [1]. This advice is sound, probably for both life and science, but even the best tool (like the library) is most effective when accompanied by instructions and a basic understanding of how and when to use it. For many budding scientists, the first day in a new lab setting often involves a stack of papers, an email full of links to pertinent articles, or some promise of a richer understanding so long as one reads enough of the scientific literature. However, the purpose and approach to reading a scientific article is unlike that of reading a news story, novel, or even a textbook and can initially seem unapproachable. Having good habits for reading scientific literature is key to setting oneself up for success, identifying new research questions, and filling in the gaps in one’s current understanding; developing these good habits is the first crucial step. Advice typically centers around two main tips: read actively and read often. However, active reading, or reading with an intent to understand, is both a learned skill and a level of effort. Although there is no one best way to do this, we present 10 simple rules, relevant to novices and seasoned scientists alike, to teach our strategy for active reading based on our experience as readers and as mentors of undergraduate and graduate researchers, medical students, fellows, and early career faculty. Rules 1–5 are big picture recommendations. Rules 6–8 relate to philosophy of reading. Rules 9–10 guide the “now what?” questions one should ask after reading and how to integrate what was learned into one’s own science.
- Published
- 2020
4. Good enough practices in scientific computing.
- Author
-
Wilson G, Bryan J, Cranston K, Kitzes J, Nederbragt L, and Teal TK
- Subjects
- Documentation standards, Guidelines as Topic, Computer Security standards, Computing Methodologies, Data Accuracy, Research standards, Science standards, Software standards
- Abstract
Computers are now essential in all branches of science, but most researchers are never taught the equivalent of basic lab skills for research computing. As a result, data can get lost, analyses can take much longer than necessary, and researchers are limited in how effectively they can work with software and data. Computing workflows need to follow the same practices as lab projects and notebooks, with organized data, documented steps, and the project structured for reproducibility, but researchers new to computing often don't know where to start. This paper presents a set of good computing practices that every researcher can adopt, regardless of their current level of computational skill. These practices, which encompass data management, programming, collaborating with colleagues, organizing projects, tracking work, and writing manuscripts, are drawn from a wide variety of published sources from our daily lives and from our work with volunteer organizations that have delivered workshops to over 11,000 people since 2010.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Ten simple rules for measuring the impact of workshops.
- Author
-
Sufi, Shoaib, Nenadic, Aleksandra, Silva, Raniere, Balzano, Melissa, Coelho, Sara, Ford, Heather, Jones, Catherine, Higgins, Vanessa, Duckles, Beth, Simera, Iveta, de Beyer, Jennifer A., Struthers, Caroline, Nurmikko-Fuller, Terhi, Bellis, Louisa, Miah, Wadud, Wilde, Adriana, Emsley, Iain, and Philippe, Olivier
- Subjects
FORUMS ,RESEARCH ,DECISION making ,STRATEGIC planning ,PARTICIPATION - Abstract
Workshops are used to explore a specific topic, to transfer knowledge, to solve identified problems, or to create something new. In funded research projects and other research endeavours, workshops are the mechanism used to gather the wider project, community, or interested people together around a particular topic. However, natural questions arise: how do we measure the impact of these workshops? Do we know whether they are meeting the goals and objectives we set for them? What indicators should we use? In response to these questions, this paper will outline rules that will improve the measurement of the impact of workshops. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research.
- Author
-
Ross-Hellauer, Tony, Tennant, Jonathan P., Banelytė, Viltė, Gorogh, Edit, Luzi, Daniela, Kraker, Peter, Pisacane, Lucio, Ruggieri, Roberta, Sifacaki, Electra, and Vignoli, Michela
- Subjects
RESEARCH - Abstract
Author summary: How we communicate research is changing because of new (especially digital) possibilities. This article sets out 10 easy steps researchers can take to disseminate their work in novel and engaging ways, and hence increase the impact of their research on science and society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Ten simple rules for providing a meaningful research experience to high school students.
- Author
-
Lescak, Emily A., O’Neill, Kate M., Collu, Giovanna M., and Das, Subhamoy
- Subjects
RESEARCH ,HIGH school students ,MENTORING ,STEM education ,STEM occupations - Abstract
An editorial is presented on rules for providing a meaningful research experience to high school students. Topics discussed include ten rules for becoming an effective research mentor for high school students and their training, research opportunities as undergraduates and career consideration in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics and bridging the gap between scientists and the general public on scientific research.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Ten simple rules to make the most out of your undergraduate research career.
- Author
-
Yu, Megan and Kuo, Yu-Min
- Subjects
RESEARCH ,UNDERGRADUATES ,CAREER development ,MASSIVE open online courses ,RESEARCH personnel - Abstract
The article discusses several rules for undergraduates to help them intellectually enrich their research experiences, in view of benefits of research in undergraduate education, and their struggle in understanding purpose of work. Topics include need for undergraduates to start early to explore research interests and goals for career; having a background knowledge in the research area using resources like Massive Open Online Courses; and having positive relationships with research colleagues.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Ten Simple Rules for Curating and Facilitating Small Workshops.
- Author
-
McInerny, Greg J.
- Subjects
FORUMS ,WORKSHOPS (Facilities) -- Design & construction ,RESEARCH ,TOPIC & comment (Grammar) ,DISCUSSION ,TIME perspective ,INTERACTION model (Communication) - Abstract
The article discusses the creation of good workshops which could be in a diverse form and fit different goals. This is needed for exploring a single research topic, initiation of working group, and interdisciplinary collaborations. It requires attendees, timetables, and interactions. Topics discussed processes in facilitating workshops including assessment on past success and failures, developing of workshop name, and preparing for speakers speech.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Ten simple rules for measuring the impact of workshops
- Author
-
Iain Emsley, Caroline Struthers, Beth M. Duckles, Jennifer A. de Beyer, Catherine Jones, Terhi Nurmikko-Fuller, Adriana Wilde, Heather Ford, Louisa J. Bellis, Wadud Miah, Iveta Simera, Melissa Balzano, Raniere Silva, Aleksandra Nenadic, Olivier Philippe, Vanessa Higgins, Sara Coelho, and Shoaib Sufi
- Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences ,0301 basic medicine ,QH301-705.5 ,Education ,Computer Science - Computers and Society ,03 medical and health sciences ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,0302 clinical medicine ,Computers and Society (cs.CY) ,Computer software ,Genetics ,Natural (music) ,Humans ,Learning ,Sociology ,Biology (General) ,Set (psychology) ,Molecular Biology ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Simple (philosophy) ,Research assessment ,Ecology ,Research ,Survey research ,Weights and Measures ,030104 developmental biology ,Knowledge ,Computational Theory and Mathematics ,Modeling and Simulation ,Engineering ethics ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Human learning - Abstract
Workshops are used to explore a specific topic, to transfer knowledge, to solve identified problems, or to create something new. In funded research projects and other research endeavours, workshops are the mechanism used to gather the wider project, community, or interested people together around a particular topic. However, natural questions arise: how do we measure the impact of these workshops? Do we know whether they are meeting the goals and objectives we set for them? What indicators should we use? In response to these questions, this paper will outline rules that will improve the measurement of the impact of workshops.
- Published
- 2018
11. Ten Simple Rules for Protecting Research Integrity
- Author
-
Thomas C. Erren, David Shaw, Metamedica, RS: CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, and RS: CAPHRI - R4 - Health Inequities and Societal Participation
- Subjects
Quality Control ,Modern medicine ,Scientific Misconduct ,Guidelines as Topic ,Disclosure ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,Misconduct ,Political science ,Malpractice ,Genetics ,Enforcement ,lcsh:QH301-705.5 ,Molecular Biology ,Scientific misconduct ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Research ethics ,Ecology ,Research ,Editorial ,lcsh:Biology (General) ,Computational Theory and Mathematics ,Modeling and Simulation ,Mandate ,Science policy ,Engineering ethics ,Guideline Adherence ,Algorithms - Abstract
Research integrity is frequently highlighted as an essential component of modern medicine and science. Adherence to the ethical principles of one’s profession might seem like a simple task, but research misconduct remains a serious problem. Despite repeated calls for increased emphasis on the importance of research integrity [1–6] and a proliferation of guidelines regulating scientific misconduct at the international, national, and institutional levels [7,8], recent scandals concerning falsification and suppression of results [9,10] suggest that we need to more carefully nurture the ethical integrity of our research endeavours. Most of the recent controversy concerning scientific misconduct has focused on plagiarism and fabrication of results. This type of malpractice has rightly been universally recognized as a very serious breach of research integrity. However, the focus on these abuses has distracted attention away from other practices which, while they may not jeopardize the scientific process to the same extent, are nonetheless clearly breaches of scientific integrity. Much more could be done to combat authorship misattribution, failure to declare relevant conflicts of interest (COIs), failure to report results, and misuse of metrics in funding decisions—in terms of both establishing stronger guidelines and ensuring their enforcement. Although many institutions have official integrity guidelines, these frequently act as a window dressing—claiming to address key integrity issues while allowing corrosive low-level misconduct to proliferate. For example, putting pressure on junior researchers to allow guest authors on papers is not only unethical but also makes it more likely that they will see such behaviour as acceptable. Here, we suggest ten simple rules that should be put into action by all research institutions and to which all researchers should adhere in order to ensure ethical behaviour in science and medicine. In our view, all integrity guidelines should mandate these minimum requirements. Rules 1–5 are specific recommendations for particular integrity issues, and Rules 6–10 concern what institutions themselves should do.
- Published
- 2015
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.