1. On using centrality to understand importance of entities in the Panama Papers
- Author
-
Mayank Kejriwal
- Subjects
Computer and Information Sciences ,Knowledge management ,Panama ,Economics ,Yield (finance) ,Science ,Globe ,Social Sciences ,Network science ,Research and Analysis Methods ,Geographical locations ,Intermediary ,Sociology ,medicine ,Humans ,Centrality ,Multidisciplinary ,business.industry ,Experimental Design ,Commerce ,Central America ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Social Networks ,Research Design ,Computational Sociology ,Scale (social sciences) ,North America ,Medicine ,Computational sociology ,People and places ,Construct (philosophy) ,business ,Network Analysis ,Finance ,Research Article - Abstract
The Panama Papers comprise one of the most recent influential leaks containing detailed information on intermediary companies (such as law firms), offshore entities and company officers, and serve as a valuable source of insight into the operations of (approximately) 214,000 shell companies incorporated in tax havens around the globe over the past half century. Entities and relations in the papers can be used to construct a network that permits, in principle, a systematic and scientific study at scale using techniques developed in the computational social science and network science communities. In this paper, we propose such a study by attempting to quantify and profile the importance of entities. In particular, our research explores whether intermediaries are significantly more influential than offshore entities, and whether different centrality measures lead to varying, or even incompatible, conclusions. Some findings yield conclusions that resemble Simpson’s paradox. We also explore the role that jurisdictions play in determining entity importance.
- Published
- 2020