Search

Scientific evidence plays an important role in the therapeutic decision-making process. What happens when physicians are forced to make therapeutic decisions under uncertainty? The absence of scientific guidelines at the beginning of a pandemic due to an unknown virus, such as COVID-19, could influence the perceived legitimacy of the application of non-evidence-based therapeutic approaches. This paper reports on a test of this hypothesis, in which we administered an ad hoc questionnaire to a sample of 64 Italian physicians during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy (April 2020). The questionnaire statements regarding the legitimacy of off-label or experimental drugs were framed according to three different scenarios (Normality, Emergency and COVID-19). Furthermore, as the perception of internal bodily sensations (i.e., interoception) modulates the decision-making process, we tested participants' interoceptive sensibility using the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). The results showed that participants were more inclined to legitimate non-evidence-based therapeutic approaches in the COVID-19 and Emergency scenarios than the Normality scenario. We also found that scores on the MAIA Trusting subscale positively predicted this difference. Our findings demonstrate that uncertain medical scenarios, involving a dramatic increase in patient volume and acuity, can increase risk-taking in therapeutic decision-making. Furthermore, individual characteristics of health care providers, such as interoceptive ability, should be taken into account when constructing models to prevent the breakdown of healthcare systems in cases of severe emergency.

Proprioception acquires a crucial role in estimating the configuration of our body segments in space when visual information is not available. Proprioceptive accuracy is assessed by asking participants to match the perceived position of an unseen body landmark through reaching movements. This task was also adopted to study the perceived hand structure by computing the relative distances between averaged proprioceptive judgments (hand Localization Task). However, the pattern of proprioceptive errors leading to the misperceived hand structure is unexplored. Here, we aimed to characterize this pattern across different hand landmarks, having different anatomo-physiological properties and cortical representations. Furthermore, we sought to describe the error consistency and its stability over time. To this purpose, we analyzed the proprioceptive errors of 43 healthy participants during the hand Localization Task. We found larger but more consistent errors for the fingertips compared to the knuckles, possibly due to poorer proprioceptive signal, compensated by other sources of spatial information. Furthermore, we found a shift (overlap effect) and a temporal drift of the hand perceived position towards the shoulder of origin, which was consistent within and between subjects. The overlap effect had a greater influence on lateral compared to medial landmarks, leading to the hand width overestimation. Our results are compatible with domain-general and body-specific spatial biases affecting the proprioceptive localization of the hand landmarks, thus the apparent hand structure misperception.