1. Intraretinal microvascular changes after ERM and ILM peeling using SSOCTA.
- Author
-
Told R, Georgopoulos M, Reiter GS, Wassermann L, Aliyeva L, Baumann L, Abela-Formanek C, Pollreisz A, Schmidt-Erfurth U, and Sacu S
- Subjects
- Aged, Blood Vessels diagnostic imaging, Blood Vessels growth & development, Blood Vessels physiopathology, Epiretinal Membrane diagnostic imaging, Female, Fluorescein Angiography, Fovea Centralis blood supply, Fovea Centralis physiopathology, Humans, Macula Lutea blood supply, Macula Lutea diagnostic imaging, Macula Lutea physiopathology, Male, Middle Aged, Retina physiopathology, Retinal Vessels growth & development, Retinal Vessels physiopathology, Visual Acuity physiology, Vitrectomy, Epiretinal Membrane physiopathology, Retina diagnostic imaging, Retinal Vessels diagnostic imaging, Tomography, Optical Coherence
- Abstract
Background: To prospectively investigate retinal vascular changes in patients undergoing epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling using swept source optical coherence tomography angiography (SSOCTA)., Methods: Consecutive patients were grouped based on ERM severity and followed using SSOCTA up to month 3 after surgical intervention. Superficial and deep foveal avascular zone (s/dFAZ) as well as foveal and parafoveal vessel density (VD) were correlated with ERM severity and visual acuity. Differences between groups were evaluated., Results: Significant correlations were found between ERM severity and baseline sFAZ, dFAZ and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal subfield thickness (CST) and ΔCST (r = -0.52, r = -0.43, r = -0.42, r = 0.58, r = 0.39; all p<0.05). Vascular flow parameters did not correlate with age, peeling size, pseudophakia or CST, but correlated with intraretinal cysts presence. No associations of BCVA with any of the OCTA parameters across time were found. Significant differences between ERM severity groups 1 and 2 were found for sFAZ at baseline (p = 0.005) and at the 3-month follow-up (p = 0.014), and for dFAZ at baseline (p = 0.017). Superficial foveal and parafoveal VD were not significantly different between groups (all p>0.05)., Conclusions: This study clearly shows that ERM severity based on ERM staging has to be taken into account when undertaking studies in patients with idiopathic ERM using SSOCTA. Further, specific changes in the superficial and deep retinal vasculature in eyes undergoing ERM and ILM peeling were found. However, the clinical usefulness and prognostic value for post-surgical treatment BCVA of the SSOCTA-derived variables (sFAZ and dFAZ area, as well as foveal and parafoveal VD) used remains questionable., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF