1. The changing legitimacy of health and safety, 1960–2015: understanding the past, preparing for the future
- Author
-
Mike Esbester and Paul Almond
- Subjects
leadership ,perceprions policy recommendations ,Health (social science) ,Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 ,Consensus theory ,Commercialization ,Occupational safety and health ,Political science ,050602 political science & public administration ,Public engagement ,commercialization ,law reform ,Legitimacy ,0505 law ,050502 law ,Law reform ,business.industry ,Health Policy ,05 social sciences ,Effective safety training ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,regulation ,trades unions ,public image ,Public relations ,0506 political science ,Work (electrical) ,Law ,expertise ,business ,Safety Research - Abstract
'Health and safety’ currently has an image problem in the UK. This article explores the origins of these current negative perceptions, framed around the concept of legitimacy – the degree to which a policy project of this sort is viewed as right, proper, and appropriate. The article considers and evaluates key moments in the growth and decline of social consensus around health and safety since 1960, including the Robens Committee and subsequent Health and Safety at Work etc Act, the decline of trade unionism, the extension of health and safety beyond the workplace, and the rise of the safety profession. It concludes that change has been much more subtle and less uniform than general perceptions might suggest, and makes recommendations for how public engagement with occupational health and safety might be restructured.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF