Search

INTRODUCTION Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) emerged recently as an alternative to re-do surgery for patients with failed surgical aortic valve (SAV). OBJECTIVES To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valves (TAV) in failed SAV in Poland. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data was acquired using a nationwide, multicenter (n=14) Polish Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Implantation (ViV-TAVI) Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03361046) with online form collection and 1-year follow-up. RESULTS ViV-TAVI procedures (n=130) constituted 1.9% of all TAVI in Poland with increasing numbers since 2018 (n=59, 45% of all). Hancock II® (21%), Freestyle® (13%), and homograft (11.5%) were identified as the most frequently treated SAV's with self-expanding, supra-annular Corevalve/Evolut® TAV used in the majority of cases (76%). Average post-procedural pressure gradient (average PG) >20 mmHg was found in 21% and 1-year all-cause mortality was 10.8%. SAV stenosis compared to regurgitation/mixed disease was associated with higher average (16, IQR 13.5 - 22.5 vs 14.5, IQR 10-19 mmHg, p=0.004) whereas implantation of supra-annular TAV resulted in lower average PG (14, IQR 10.5-20 vs. intra-annular 19, IQR 16-26 mmHg, P=0.004). After introduction of 2nd generation TAV, shorter procedure time (120, IQR 80-165 min. vs. 135, IQR 108-200 min., P=0.04), less frequent need for additional TAV (2% vs. 10%, P=0.04) and better 1-year freedrom from cardiovascular deaths (95% vs. 82.8%, hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence intervals 0.17-0.88, P=0.03) was observed vs. 1st generation. CONCLUSIONS Transcatheter treatment of failed SAV is becoming more frequent, showing the best hemodynamic effect with the use of supra-annular TAV and improved procedural as well as clinical results with the introduction of 2nd generation TAV.

INTRODUCTION Currently, no risk score for predicting significant bleeding complications (SBCs) after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) surgery is available. OBJECTIVES We aimed to develop a new scoring system for predicting SBCs aft er CIED surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS The incidence of SBCs was 4.5%. Based on multivariable analyses, the following predictors of SBCs were identified: age ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR], 8.10; 95% CI, 3.54-18.54); cardiac resynchronization therapy or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator surgery (OR, 5.96; 95% CI, 2.48-14.32); upgrade procedure (OR, 10.22; 95% CI, 4.05-25.78); uncontrolled arterial hypertension (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.78-13.06); presence of valvular prosthesis (OR, 7.85; 95% CI, 3.15-19.58); current malignancy (OR, 6.11; 95% CI, 1.81-20.66); renal failure (OR, 4.28; 95% CI, 1.86-9.87); and the use of antiplatelet drugs (clopidogrel [OR, 6.69; 95% CI, 2.48-18.04] or ticagrelor [OR, 22.25; 95% CI, 4.56-108.46]). The score was created using the weighted points proportional to the β regression coefficient of each predictor rounded to the nearest integer, and the acronym PACE DRAP corresponds to the predictor's first letter. The cutoff point for the high risk of SBCs was 6 points with a sensitivity of 88.24% and a specificity of 87.23%. The PACE DRAP showed good predictive ability (area under the curve, 0.95 ; P