Search

Purpose: Abdominal compression (COMP) and breath-hold with an active breathing coordinator (ABC) device are 2 different respiratory motion management techniques used in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) practice. We compared local failure (LF) results for COMP versus ABC., Methods and Materials: We surveyed our institutional review board-approved prospective registry for patients who were treated with SBRT for either a primary lung cancer (PRIME) or an oligometastatic (OLIGO) diagnosis with a minimum of 6 months' follow-up to determine their rates of local failure by motion management modality., Results: From October 2003 to July 2014, 873 patients with 931 lesions were treated. Patient characteristics included: 455 (52.1%) female; median age of 73 years (range, 37-97); median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 80 (range, 40-100); and median BMI of 26.2 (range, 12.1-56.3). Tumor characteristics included: median tumor size of 2.2 cm (range, 0.7-10.0); median maximum standardized uptake value from positron emission tomography PET SUVmax of 7.5 (range, 0.8-59); 234 (25.4%) were central lesions; 830 (89.2%) lesions were PRIME; and 101 (10.8%) were OLIGO. Median follow-up and SBRT dose were 16.4 months and 50 G in 5 fractions, respectively. Overall crude rate of LF was 9.9%. Use of ABC was not associated with increased LF compared with COMP: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.043 (95% CI 0.48-2.29; P = .92). Three-year actuarial rates of LF for ABC versus COMP were 13.8% and 16.5%, respectively. After stratifying by OLIGO/PRIME, neither ABC nor COMP was significantly associated with LF. Central location may be associated with LF with ABC (HR = 2.087, P = .066). On univariate analysis, BMI, tumor size, PET SUV max and central location were associated with failure, with size the most significant., Conclusions: LF rates after lung SBRT were not influenced by form of motion control overall or when stratified by tumor type. Further study on LF rates for central tumors where ABC is used is warranted., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The toxicity profile of breast reconstruction with postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) varies by technique and timing, and long-term data are limited. We compared rates of complications requiring reoperation (CRR) and reconstruction failure (RF) between immediate autologous reconstruction (I-AR), immediate tissue expander/implant reconstruction (I-TE/I), delayed autologous reconstruction (D-AR), and delayed tissue expander/implant reconstruction (D-TE/I) in patients receiving PMRT., Methods and Materials: Patients who received autologous reconstruction (AR) or tissue expander/implant reconstruction (TE/I) and PMRT between 2000 to 2008 were included. Reconstruction was immediate if performed on the same day as mastectomy followed by PMRT (I-AR or I-TE/I) or delayed if after PMRT (D-AR and D-TE/I). CRR was defined as an unplanned return to the operating room for infection, dehiscence, necrosis, hematoma, or hernia (with AR) and extrusion, leak, or contracture (with TE/I). RF was defined as unplanned conversion to another reconstruction technique or to flat chest wall. Cumulative incidence of CRR and RF was calculated using Kaplan-Meier and compared using the log-rank test. Logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with CRR and RF., Results: Two hundred four patients were included. Median follow-up was 8 years. There were 127 AR cases (63%) and 77 TE/I cases (38%). At 5 years, CRR was 18%, 38%, 34%, and 70% (P = .010) and RF was 4%, 22%, 7%, and 56% (P < .0001) for I-AR, I-TE/I, D-AR, and D-TE/I, respectively. On multivariate analysis, TE/I (hazard ratio [HR] 2.0; P = .011), body mass index ≥30 (HR 3.9; P = .002), and smoking (HR 2.7; P = .001) were significant predictors for CRR, and TE/I (HR 6.6; P < .0001), diabetes (HR 4.1; P = .044), and hypertension (HR 3.5; P = .005) were significant for RF. When excluding RF because of infection, the rate of RF was not significantly different among the 4 groups (P = .23)., Conclusions: With PMRT, TE/I reconstruction in the immediate and delayed setting is associated with higher CRR and RF compared with AR. Patient factors should guide selection of technique. Efforts to reduce rates of RF with TE/I should focus on minimizing risks for infection., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Dosimetric parameters to limit chest wall toxicity (CWT) are not well defined in single-fraction (SF) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) phase 2 trials. We sought to determine the relationship of tumor location and dosimetric parameters with CWT for SF-SBRT., Methods and Materials: From a prospective registry of 1462 patients, we identified patients treated with 30 Gy or 34 Gy. Gross tumor volume was measured as abutting, ≤1 cm, 1 to 2 cm, or >2 cm from the chest wall. CWT was prospectively graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0, with grade 2 requiring medical therapy, grade 3 requiring procedural intervention, and grade 4 being disabling pain. Grade 1 CWT or radiographic rib fracture was not included. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the parameters associated with CWT and calculate the probability of CWT with dose., Results: This study included 146 lesions. The median follow-up time was 23.8 months. The 5-year local control, distant metastasis, and overall survival rates were 91.8%, 19.2%, and 28.7%, respectively. Grade 2 to 4 CWT was 30.6% for lesions abutting the chest wall, 8.2% for ≤1 cm from the chest wall, 3.8% for 1 to 2 cm from the chest wall, and 5.7% for >2 cm from the chest wall. Grade ≥3 CWT was 1.4%. Tumor abutment (odds ratio [OR]: 6.5; P = .0005), body mass index (OR: 1.1; P = .02), rib D1cc (OR: 1.01/Gy; P = .03), chest wall D1cc (OR: 1.08/Gy; P = .03), and chest wall D5cc (OR: 1.10/Gy; P = .01) were significant predictors for CWT on univariate analysis. Tumor abutment was significant for CWT (OR: 7.5; P = .007) on multivariate analysis. The probability of CWT was 15% with chest wall D5cc at 27.2 Gy and rib D1cc at 30.2 Gy., Conclusions: The rate of CWT with SF-SBRT is similar to the rates published for fractionated SBRT, with most CWT being low grade. Tumor location relative to the chest wall is not a contraindication to SF-SBRT, but the rates increase significantly with abutment. Rib D1cc and chest wall D1cc and D5cc may be used as predictors of CWT., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To report on the patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics of patients aged 90 years or older who were treated with lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early stage lung cancer and the resulting clinical outcomes., Methods and Materials: We surveyed our institutional review board-approved prospective lung SBRT data registry for patients aged 90 years or older who were treated for early stage lung cancer to determine the rates of local failure, progression-free survival, and overall survival as well as treatment-related toxicity., Results: For the 2004 to 2016 time period, 19 patients (of a total of 1268 lung SBRT cases) were identified. The median age at treatment was 91.6 years (range, 90-97 years). Most patients were female (52.6%) and former smokers (78.9%). The median tumor size was 2.1 cm (range, 1.5-5.4 cm). Tissue was obtained for diagnosis in 68.4% of patients, with the predominant histology being adenocarcinoma (42.2%). Six patients (31.6%) had central lesions. The median follow-up for all patients was 17.3 months. The median SBRT schedule was 50 Gy in 5 fractions over 5 consecutive days and was used in 9 cases (47.4%). The median pre-SBRT and 6-month post-SBRT pulmonary testing showed that the forced expiratory volume in one second, as the percent predicted, was 81.9 and 84.5 and the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, as the percent predicted, was 66.5 and 67, respectively. No grade 3 or higher toxicities were observed. The 2-year rates of local failure, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 5.6%, 48.6%, and 47.8%, respectively., Conclusions: Lung SBRT appears to be safe and effective in nonagenarians with stage I lung cancer. The absence of high-grade toxicities and mortality warrants its consideration as the primary curative modality in this population., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To report on medically inoperable stage I small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients for whom stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was employed to manage the primary tumor., Methods and Materials: Review of our institutional review board approved SBRT registry revealed 6 cases of stage I SCLC out of 430 patients over a 6-year interval (2004-2010). All patients had biopsy proven disease and deemed medically inoperable by a thoracic surgeon. Our institutional approach was to treat with a combination of SBRT, platinum-etoposide chemotherapy (CHT) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). SBRT was delivered using a Novalis/BrainLAB platform and ExacTrac (BrainLab, Westchester, IL) for image guidance., Results: Patient characteristics included a median Karnofsky performance scale of 80, a median age of 68 years, 4 females, and 1 patient still smoking at presentation. Impaired pulmonary function caused inoperability in 50% of cases. Tumor characteristics included median tumor size of 2.6 cm and median positron emission tomography-standard uptake valuemax of 9. The SBRT was 60 Gy/3 fractions (3 patients), 50 Gy/5 fractions (2 patients), 30 Gy/1 fraction (1 patient). Median follow-up was 11.9 months. There was no grade 3 or higher, and 1 grade 2, toxicity. Three patients were alive at analysis and 3 patients had died of non-cancer causes. At 1 year, local control was 100%, there was no regional nodal failure, and 1 patient had distant failure (liver). Overall and disease-free survivals at 1 year were 63% and 75%, respectively., Conclusions: Employing SBRT for stage I medically inoperable SCLC is rational, with excellent local control and encouraging disease-specific survival. The absence of regional nodal failure supports positron emission tomography for mediastinal staging. Platinum-based CHT may be feasible in vulnerable populations., (Copyright © 2013 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)