Search

This paper presents some concepts interwoven with different courses of action that are relevant to making decisions on student assessment. At the end of this paper we put forward a proposal for a classroom activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Each time people speak about education quality, good or bad quality, confrontations arise because everyone ex presses what he/she thinks, loaded with ideology and therefore, subjectivity. It depends on the circumstance in which we are asked the question as well as on the parameters and the paradigms the evaluator supports. In this paper it is considered that the quality of education is sieved by three main paradigms: the necessity of reading, the teacher's passion showing his/her strong convictions on their role, and fulfilling three essential requirements: to plan, to develop and to evaluate the class. This task requires the capacity of correction, reflection and study, and that the teachers dare to create work ways that put them in the place of others. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Each time people speak about education quality, good or bad quality, confrontations arise because everyone expresses what he/she thinks, loaded with ideology and therefore, subjectivity. It depends on the circumstance in which we are asked the question as well as on the parameters and the paradigms the evaluator supports. In this paper it is considered that the quality of education is sieved by three main paradigms: the necessity of reading, the teacher's passion showing his/her strong convictions on their role, and fulfilling three essential requirements: to plan, to develop and to evaluate the class. This task requires the capacity of correction, reflection and study, and that the teachers dare to create work ways that put them in the place of others. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper shows a self-assessment experience from students in PETE (Physical Education Teacher Education) in Argentina and its relationship with similar experiences in U.S.A. and Spain. In the first place there is a description of the experience which is later compared with different authors' conclusions and findings with which we worked in our context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]