Search

A classical result of K. L. Chung and W. Feller deals with the partial sums S k S_k arising in a fair coin-tossing game. If N n N_n is the number of “positive” terms among S 1 S_1 , S 2 S_2 , …, S n S_n then the quantity P ( N 2 n = 2 r ) P(N_{2n} = 2r) takes an elegant form. We lift the restriction on an even number of tosses and give a simple expression for P ( N 2 n + 1 = r ) P(N_{2n+1} = r) , r = 0 r = 0 , 1 1 , 2 2 , …, 2 n + 1 2n+1 . We get to this ansatz by adaptating the Feynman–Kac methodology.

We show that a relative entropy condition recently shown by Leger and Vasseur to imply uniqueness and stable $L^2$ dependence on initial data of Lax 1- or $n$-shock solutions of an $n\times n$ system of hyperbolic conservation laws with convex entropy implies Lopatinski stability in the sense of Majda. This means in particular that Leger and Vasseur's relative entropy condition represents a considerable improvement over the standard entropy condition of decreasing shock strength and increasing entropy along forward Hugoniot curves, which, in a recent example exhibited by Barker, Freist\"uhler and Zumbrun, was shown to fail to imply Lopatinski stability, even for systems with convex entropy. This observation bears also on the parallel question of existence, at least for small $BV$ or $H^s$ perturbations, Comment: to appear in Proceedings of the AMS

In a recent paper, Chao-Ping Chen and Feng Qi (2005) established sharp upper and lower bounds for the sequence P n := 1.3 … ( 2 n − 1 ) 2.4 … 2 n P_{n}:=\frac {1.3\ldots (2n-1)}{2.4\ldots 2n} . We show that their result follows easily from a theorem of G. N Watson published in 1959. We also show that the main result of Chen and Qi’s paper is a special case of a more general inequality which admits a very short proof.

Concerns have been voiced about the correctness of certain technical points in DiPerna’s paper (Comm. Math. Phys. 91 (1983), 1–30) related to the vacuum state. In this note, we provide clarifications. Our conclusion is that these concerns mainly arise from the statement of a lemma for constructing the viscous approximate solutions and some typos; however, the gap can be either fixed by correcting the statement of the lemma and the typos or bypassed by employing the finite difference methods. In [Di], DiPerna found a global entropy solution of the isentropic Euler equations for the following exponents in the equation of state for the pressure: γ = 1 + 2/(2m+ 1), m ≥ 2 integer. (1) He divided his arguments into the following two steps. 1. Compactness framework Assume that a sequence of approximate solutions (ρ (x, t),m (x, t)), 0 ≤ t ≤ T , satisfies: (i). There exists a constant C(T ) > 0, independent of > 0, such that 0 ≤ ρ (x, t) ≤ C, |m (x, t)/ρ (x, t)| ≤ C; (ii). For all weak entropy pairs (η, q) of the isentropic Euler equations, the measure sequence η(ρ ,m )t + q(ρ ,m )x is contained in a compact subset of H −1 loc (R× [0, T ]). If γ satisfies (1), then the sequence (ρ (x, t),m (x, t)) is compact in Lloc(R× [0, T ]). The reason for the restriction on the number γ is that, in such a case, any weak entropy function is a polynomial function of the Riemann invariants (w, z). This is the key step in DiPerna’s arguments and is also his main contribution to the compensated compactness method in this aspect. Received by the editors May 16, 1996. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 35K55, 35L65; Secondary 76N15, 35L60, 65M06.

We give a simplified proof of an imbedding theorem by C. Fefferman [3].

Here we give a result on the postulation (i.e. the 2-normality) of nonlinearly normal embeddings of Abelian varieties. This result improves some of the results proved in a recent paper by Ch. Birkenhake.

In this paper we point out an error in paper [2] and study the asymptotic behavior of the differential equation Lnx + f(t, x) = r(t). The results obtained are extensions of some of the results of [2].

A class of functions K(r) and the corresponding solutions are produced in the case of the differential equation d 2 u/dr 2 +1 du/r dr+K(r)e 2u(r) =1. The behavior of these solutions at an isolated singularity is also investigated

We observe that a strictly singular operator is not necessarily condensing, so that the invariant subspace problem for strictly singular operators remains open.

We establish the relationship between certain invariant extension properties for linear functional of K. Fan when a semigroup S acts on a locally convex topological vector space and the existence of a left-invariant mean on the space of almost periodic and weakly almost periodic functions on S.

A subset A A of a topological space is said to be semi-open if there exists an open set U U such that U ⊆ A ⊆ Cl ⁡ ( U ) U \subseteq A \subseteq \operatorname {Cl} (U) where Cl ⁡ ( U ) \operatorname {Cl} (U) denotes the closure of U U . The class of semi-open sets of a given topological space ( X , T ) (X,\mathcal {T}) is denoted S .O . ( X , T ) {\text {S}}{\text {.O}}{\text {.}}(X,\mathcal {T}) . In the paper Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological spaces, Amer. Math. Monthly 70 (1963), 36-41, Norman Levine states in Theorem 10 that if T \mathcal {T} and T ∗ {\mathcal {T}^ \ast } are two topologies for a set X X such that S .O . ( X , T ) ⊆ S .O . ( X , T ∗ ) {\text {S}}{\text {.O}}{\text {.}}(X,\mathcal {T}) \subseteq {\text {S}}{\text {.O}}{\text {.}}(X,{\mathcal {T}^ \ast }) , then T ⊆ T ∗ \mathcal {T} \subseteq {\mathcal {T}^ \ast } . In a corollary to this theorem, Levine states that if S .O . ( X , T ) = S .O . ( X , T ∗ ) {\text {S}}{\text {.O}}{\text {.}}(X,\mathcal {T}) = {\text {S}}{\text {.O}}{\text {.}}(X,{\mathcal {T}^ \ast }) , then T = T ∗ \mathcal {T} = {\mathcal {T}^ \ast } . An example is given which shows the above-mentioned theorem and its corollary are false. This paper shows how different topologies on a set which determine the same class of semi-open subsets can arise from functions, and points out some of the implications of two topologies being related in this manner.

The object of this note is to point out and correct an error in the paper [21 of Fox, purporting to prove Fenchel's conjecture that a finitely generated. infinite Fuchsian group has a torsion-free normal subgroup of finite index. Fox divided the proof of the main result in his paper into four cases and an error occurs in the proofs of Cases (III) and (IV). A direct proof of Case (III) was given. While a direct proof of Case (IV) can be given, the author shows that it also follows indirectly from the result in the paper [1] of Burns and Solitar. Given any three integers a > 1, b > 1 and c > 1, there exist permutations A of order a and B of order b, such that AB has order c. Fox divided the proof of this lemma into the four cases: (I) ab 0 (mod 2) and max{a, b} ? c < a + b, (II) ab 0 (mod 2) and c : a + b, (III) a b c 1 (mod 2), (IV) a b 1 and c 0 (mod 2), and subcases. In the subcase m(a + b 2) + 2 ? c < (m + l)(b + 1) 1 of Case (III) where m is the largest integer not exceeding (c l)/(b + 1), and it is assumed that a ? b < c, the number of distinct symbols in the permutations [2, p. 64] nl~~~W B ( Wv-sI .. WI2 I7 (vWb B = (vl * *t*v W_ ***W P2) * (V W2 .. * ]Pi+]1)'

The paper consists of two parts. In the first part a short proof of the main theorem due to A. Aziz on the location of zeros of composite polynomials is given. In the second part some properties of a fixed length continuation of a polynomial are deduced.

Among other results, it is proved that if a sequence { μ n } \{ {\mu _n}\} of regular measures on a Hausdorff space, with values in a normed group, is convergent to zero for all σ \sigma -compact sets or all open sets, then there exists a maximal open set U such that μ ˙ n ( U ) → 0 , { μ ˙ n } {\dot \mu _n}(U) \to 0,\{ {\dot \mu _n}\} being the associated submeasures.

We give a simplified proof to the following theorem due to D. Quillen: if A is a commutative noetherian ring of global dimension ⩽ 1 \leqslant 1 , then finitely generated projective modules over A [ T 1 , … , T n ] A[{T_1}, \ldots ,{T_n}] are extended from A. We prove also that if A is a commutative noetherian ring of global dimension d, then finitely generated projective modules of rank > d > d over A [ T 1 , … , T n ] A[{T_1}, \ldots ,{T_n}] are extended from A.

A subset A of a topological space is said to be semi-open if there exists an open set U such that U C A C Cl(U) where Cl(U) denotes the closure of U. The class of semi-open sets of a given topological space (X, J) is denoted S.O. (X, J). In the paper Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological spaces, Amer. Math. Monthly 70 (1963), 36-41, Norman Levine states in Theorem 10 that if J and V* are two topologies for a set X such that S.O.(X, 3) C S.O.(X, J*), then 'J C P. In a corollary to this theorem, Levine states that if S.O.(X, if) = S.O.(X,Jf*), then _T= f*. An example is given which shows the above-mentioned theorem and its corollary are false. This paper shows how different topologies on a set which determine the same class of semi-open subse,ts can arise from functions, and points out some of the implications of two topologies being related in this manner. In [6] Norman Levine defines a set A in a topological space X to be semi-open if there exists an open set U such that U C A C Cl (U), where Cl(U) denotes the closure of U. The class of semi-open sets for a given topological space (X, i) is denoted S.O. (X, sT). Levine states in Theorem 10 of [6] that if Jf and * are two topologies for a set X such that S.O. (X, i) C S.O. (X, J9 then iT C *. In a corollary to this theorem, Levine states that if S.O. (X, ) = S.O. (X, iT*), then Jf = -" The following example which is due to S. Gene Crossley and S. K. Hildebrand [1, Example 1.1] shows the above-mentioned theorem and its corollary are false. Example. Let X = la, b, cl, J; = t0, sal, la, bl, la, cl, XI, ;* = 10, sal, la, bl, XI. An exhaustion of all possibilities shows that S.O. (X, ) = S.O. (x, 5j*). Crossley and Hildebrand [3] defined two topologies iT and T* on a set X to be semi-correspondent if S.O. (X, J) = S.O. (X, 5f*). It is shown in [3] that semi-correspondence is an equivalence relation on the collection of Received by the editors March 3, 1974. AMS (MOS) subject classifications (1970). Primary 54B99; Secondary 54C10.

J. L. Palacios claimed [2] that the author’s paper [1] contained errors. This note refutes those claims by showing that Palacios misunderstood [1] and adopted assumptions different from those of [1].

In this short paper, we prove a Hitchin-Thorpe type inequality for closed 4-manifolds with non-positive Yamabe invariant, and admitting long time solutions of the normalized Ricci flow equation with bounded scalar curvature.

In this short paper we prove that, for3≤N≤93 \le N \le 9, the problem−Δu=eu-\Delta u = e^uon the entire Euclidean spaceRN\mathbb {R}^Ndoes not admit any solution stable outside a compact set ofRN\mathbb {R}^N. This result is obtained without making any assumption about the boundedness of solutions. Furthermore, as a consequence of our analysis, we also prove the non-existence of finite Morse Index solutions for the considered problem. We then use our results to give some applications to bounded domain problems.

In this short paper, we will give a simple and transcendental proof for Mok's theorem of the generalized Frankel conjecture. This work is based on the maximum principle proposed by Brendle and Schoen.

In this short paper we prove that every sufficiently large odd integer can be written as a sum of one prime, two squares of primes and 83 83 powers of 2 2 .

Wahl recently proved that the homology of the non-orientable mapping class group stabilizes as the genus increases. In this short paper we analyse the situation where the underlying non-orientable surfaces have marked points.