1. MRI-targeted or systematic random biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy naïve patients: follow-up of a PRECISION trial-like retrospective cohort
- Author
-
Sarah Alessi, Giulia Marvaso, Deliu-Victor Matei, Michele Catellani, Stefano Luzzago, M. Morelli, Matteo Ferro, Gennaro Musi, Roberto Bianchi, Francesco A. Mistretta, Paola Pricolo, Gabriele Cozzi, Ottavio De Cobelli, Giuseppe Petralia, Ettore Di Trapani, M.L. Piccinelli, Vito Lorusso, and Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Proportional hazards model ,Psa testing ,business.industry ,Urology ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Retrospective cohort study ,medicine.disease ,Therapy naive ,03 medical and health sciences ,Prostate cancer ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Oncology ,Prostate ,Median time ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Biopsy ,medicine ,business - Abstract
BACKGROUND To test clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) rates during follow-up in biopsy naive patients that underwent two different diagnostic pathways: (1) SB GROUP (n = 354): systematic random biopsies (SB) vs. (2) TB GROUP (n = 264): multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and only targeted biopsies (TB) of PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions. Patients with PI-RADS ≤ 2 score avoided prostate biopsies. METHODS Retrospective single centre study of 618 biopsy naive patients (2015-2018). Two different definitions of csPCa were used: (1) csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 2 (ISUP grade group [GG] ≥ 2) and (2) csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 3. Kaplan-Meier plots and univariable Cox regression models tested rates over time of csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 2 and caPCa ISUP GG ≥ 3 in SB GROUP vs. TB GROUP. RESULTS At initial biopsy, TB achieved higher rates of csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 2 (35.3 vs. 18.9%; p
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF