Search

Copyright of Protein Science: A Publication of the Protein Society is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

MD simulation of sensory rhodopsin II was executed for three intermediates (ground-state, K-state, M-state) appearing in its photocycle. We observed a large displacement of the cytoplasmic side of helixF only in M-state among the three intermediates. This displacement was transmitted to TM2, and the cytoplasmic side of TM2 rotated clockwise. These transient movements are in agreement with the results of an EPR experiment. That is, the early stage of signal transduction in a sRII-HtrII complex was successfully reproduced by the in silico MD simulation. By analyzing the structure of the sRII-HtrII complex, the following findings about the photocycle of sRII were obtained: (1) The hydrogen bonds between helixF and other helices determine the direction of the movement of helixF; (2) three amino acids (Arg162, Thr189, Tyr199) are essential for sRII-HtrII binding and contribute to the motion transfer from sRII to HtrII; (3) after the isomerization of retinal, a major conformational change of retinal was caused by proton transfer from Schiff base to Asp75, which, in turn, triggers the steric collision of retinal with Trp171. This is the main reason for the movement of the cytoplasmic side of helixF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We propose a new method for classifying and identifying transmembrane (TM) protein functions in proteome-scale by applying a single-linkage clustering method based on TM topology similarity, which is calculated simply from comparing the lengths of loop regions. In this study, we focused on 87 prokaryotic TM proteomes consisting of 31 proteobacteria, 22 gram-positive bacteria, 19 other bacteria, and 15 archaea. Prior to performing the clustering, we first categorized individual TM protein sequences as 'known,' 'putative' (similar to 'known' sequences), or 'unknown' by using the homology search and the sequence similarity comparison against SWISS-PROT to assess the current status of the functional annotation of the TM proteomes based on sequence similarity only. More than three-quarters, that is, 75.7% of the TM protein sequences are functionally 'unknown,' with only 3.8% and 20.5% of them being classified as 'known' and 'putative,' respectively. Using our clustering approach based on TM topology similarity, we succeeded in increasing the rate of TM protein sequences functionally classified and identified from 24.3% to 60.9%. Obtained clusters correspond well to functional superfamilies or families, and the functional classification and identification are successfully achieved by this approach. For example, in an obtained cluster of TM proteins with six TM segments, 109 sequences out of 119 sequences annotated as 'ATP-binding cassette transporter' are properly included and 122 'unknown' sequences are also contained. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Methods that predict the topology of helical membrane proteins are standard tools when analyzing any proteome. Therefore, it is important to improve the performance of such methods. Here we introduce a novel method, PRODIV-TMHMM, which is a profile-based hidden Markov model (HMM) that also incorporates the best features of earlier HMM methods. In our tests, PRODIV-TMHMM outperforms earlier methods both when evaluated on 'low-resolution' topology data and on high-resolution 3D structures. The results presented here indicate that the topology could be correctly predicted for approximately two-thirds of all membrane proteins using PRODIV-TMHMM. The importance of evolutionary information for topology prediction is emphasized by the fact that compared with using single sequences, the performance of PRODIV-TMHMM (as well as two other methods) is increased by approximately 10 percentage units by the use of homologous sequences. On a more general level, we also show that HMM-based (or similar) methods perform superiorly to methods that focus mainly on identification of the membrane regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Low-resolution experiments suggest that most membrane helices span over 17-25 residues and that most loops between two helices are longer than 15 residues. Both constraints have been used explicitly in the development of prediction methods. Here, we compared the largest possible sequence-unique data sets from high- and low-resolution experiments. For the high-resolution data, we found that only half of the helices fall into the expected length interval and that half of the loops were shorter than 10 residues. We compared the accuracy of detecting short loops and long helices for 28 advanced and simple prediction methods: All methods predicted short loops less accurately than longer ones. In particular, loops shorter than 7 residues appeared to be very difficult to detect by current methods. Similarly, all methods tended to be more accurate for longer than for shorter helices. However, helices with more than 32 residues were predicted less accurately than all other helices. Our findings may suggest particular strategies for improving predictions of membrane helices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Methods that predict membrane helices have become increasingly useful in the context of analyzing entire proteomes, as well as in everyday sequence analysis. Here, we analyzed 27 advanced and simple methods in detail. To resolve contradictions in previous works and to reevaluate transmembrane helix prediction algorithms, we introduced an analysis that distinguished between performance on redundancy-reduced high- and low-resolution data sets, established thresholds for significant differences in performance, and implemented both per-segment and per-residue analysis of membrane helix predictions. Although some of the advanced methods performed better than others, we showed in a thorough bootstrapping experiment based on various measures of accuracy that no method performed consistently best. In contrast, most simple hydrophobicity scale-based methods were significantly less accurate than any advanced method as they overpredicted membrane helices and confused membrane helices with hydrophobic regions outside of membranes. In contrast, the advanced methods usually distinguished correctly between membrane-helical and other proteins. Nonetheless, few methods reliably distinguished between signal peptides and membrane helices. We could not verify a significant difference in performance between eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteins. Surprisingly, we found that proteins with more than five helices were predicted at a significantly lower accuracy than proteins with five or fewer. The important implication is that structurally unsolved multispanning membrane proteins, which are often important drug targets, will remain problematic for transmembrane helix prediction algorithms. Overall, by establishing a standardized methodology for transmembrane helix prediction evaluation, we have resolved differences among previous works and presented novel trends that may impact the analysis of entire proteomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]