Search

Although social hedonic capacity is often assessed in clinical settings, its operational definitions have not been evaluated for concurrent validity. One hundred and twenty-five patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder were classified according to their self-reported social hedonic functioning into three groups on the basis of their total scores on the Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale (ACIPS). Participants were assessed before discharge using questionnaires and psychiatric rating scales. Using an empirically based cutoff score, we identified three groups: an intact social hedonic group (WNL), a socially anhedonic group (SA), and a socially hypohedonic group (i.e., those with scores intermediate between normal functioning and aberrantly low functioning, H). The SA patients were significantly different from the two other groups (WNL and H) by their higher severity of psychopathology, lower levels of self-efficacy, and less self-esteem. The SA patients also reported less perceived social support, poorer quality of life, and less subjective recovery. Our findings indicate that social anhedonia is a meaningful target for intervention. Further implications of our findings are discussed., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients' perception of psychiatric healthcare is a critical indicator in measuring service quality. The aim of the study was to determine patient's level of satisfaction with the quality of health care delivered at the inpatient departments, and to identify the service quality factors that were important to patients., Method: The Satisfaction with Psychiatry Care Questionnaire-22 was administered to 125 consecutive inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in a stable condition. Sociodemographic and background variables, illness and symptom severity, insight, social anhedonia, self-esteem, perceived social support, and satisfaction with quality of life were collected., Results: Although the participants generally expressed satisfaction with the inpatient services, they indicated that the weakest aspects of the service were in the domains of 'personal experience', 'information' and 'activity'. Women were significantly more dissatisfied than men with 'staff', 'care', and by general satisfaction. Multiple regression analysis revealed that satisfaction with hospital health care was associated with five indicators: insight, satisfaction with physical health, self-efficacy, family support, and social anhedonia., Conclusion: Personality related factors rather than psychopathological symptoms were associated with a satisfaction with care of admitted patients with severe mental illness. These factors could be targets for interventions aimed to improve treatment and hospital services., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)