1. DSM-5 section III personality traits and section II personality disorders in a Flemish community sample
- Author
-
Marc De Hert, Dirk Smits, Dominique Vanwalleghem, Tim Bastiaens, and Laurence Claes
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,050103 clinical psychology ,Psychometrics ,Personality Inventory ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Personality Disorders ,Developmental psychology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,medicine ,16PF Questionnaire ,Personality ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Big Five personality traits ,Biological Psychiatry ,media_common ,Language ,05 social sciences ,Alternative five model of personality ,Reproducibility of Results ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Personality disorders ,030227 psychiatry ,Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Facet (psychology) ,Regression Analysis ,Female ,Human medicine ,Self Report ,Personality Assessment Inventory ,Psychology ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5; Krueger et al., 2012) is a dimensional self-report questionnaire designed to measure personality pathology according to the criterion B of the DSM-5 Section III personality model. In the current issue of DSM, this dimensional Section III personality model co-exists with the Section II categorical personality model derived from DSM-IV-TR. Therefore, investigation of the inter-relatedness of both models across populations and languages is warranted. In this study, we first examined the factor structure and reliability of the PID-5 in a Flemish community sample (N=509) by means of exploratory structural equation modeling and alpha coefficients. Next, we investigated the predictive ability of section III personality traits in relation to section II personality disorders through correlations and stepwise regression analyses. Results revealed a five factor solution for the PID-5, with adequate reliability of the facet scales. The variance in Section II personality disorders could be predicted by their theoretically comprising Section III personality traits, but additional Section III personality traits augmented this prediction. Based on current results, we discuss the Section II personality disorder conceptualization and the Section III personality disorder operationalization. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
- Published
- 2015