1. REFRAINING FROM INTRUSIVE THOUGHTS IS STRATEGY DEPENDENT: A COMMENT ON SUGIURA, ET AL. AND A PRELIMINARY INFORMAL TEST OF DETACHED MINDFULNESS, ACCEPTANCE, AND OTHER STRATEGIES.
- Author
-
WELLS, ADRIAN and ROUSSIS, PANAGIOTIS
- Subjects
MINDFULNESS ,ACCEPTANCE & commitment therapy ,METACOGNITION ,MENTAL health ,PSYCHOLOGY - Abstract
The control of cognition is fundamental to psychological well being. One dimension recently explored by Sugiura, Sugiura and Tanno (2013) is the perceived ability to refrain from catastrophic thinking--a construct that could be a marker of several factors. The current paper recommends deeper consideration in terms of metacognitive theory and exemplifies this by testing the effect of a strategy that focuses on abstaining from processes (detached mindfulness) vs. transforming content (acceptance, brief exposure). Fifty-six participants (M age = 21.5 yr., range = 18-42) were randomly assigned to detached mindfulness, acceptance, exposure, or a control group before watching a stressful film that induced intrusive images. Afterwards, they engaged in their respective strategies for 5 min. and the frequency of intrusive images was rated. Detached mindfulness was the only manipulation that was associated with a statistically significant lower frequency of intrusions than the control condition. It is argued that assessment of perceived skills to refrain from thinking should be conceptualized within a metacognitive framework that distinguish process- and content-oriented strategies and address the question: When is a strategy a true refrain? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF