Search

Genetic variants in the opioid receptor mu 1 (OPRM1) and dopamine receptor d2 (DRD2) genes are implicated in behavioral phenotypes related to substance use disorders (SUD). Despite associations among OPRM1 (rs179971) and DRD2 (rs6277) genes and structural alterations in neural reward pathways implicated in SUDs, little is known about the contribution of risk-related gene variants to structural neurodevelopment. In a 3-year longitudinal study of initially SU-naïve adolescents (N = 129; 70 females; 11-14 years old), participants underwent an MRI structural scan at baseline and provided genetic assays for OPRM1 and DRD2 with SU behavior assessed during follow-up visits. Baseline differences in key reward-related brain regions (i.e., bilateral caudate and cingulate cortex) were detected in those with genetic liability for SU in OPRM1 who went onto engage in SU at subsequent waves of data collection. In addition, main effects of OPRM1, DRD2, and SU were related to variability in structure of the putamen, anterior cingulate, and nucleus accumbens, respectively. These data provide preliminary evidence that genetic risk factors interact with future SU to confer structural variability prior to SU in regions commonly implicated in risk for SU and the development of SUDs., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Rationale: Nicotine influences many cognitive processes, especially those requiring high attentional loads, yet the impact of nicotine on all aspects of information processing has not been well delineated., Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the relative behavioral and functional effects of nicotine on dissociable aspects of information processing (i.e., selective attention and motor intention)., Methods: Adult smokers (N = 25) and healthy controls (N = 23) performed the intention/attention task (IAT) twice, during functional magnetic resonance imaging. The IAT assesses the relative differences in performance evoked by prime stimuli that provide information regarding either the correct hand with which to respond (i.e., intentional primes) or the likely location of a target stimulus (i.e., attentional primes). Smokers were scanned 2 h after nicotine (21 mg) or placebo patch placement. The order of nicotine and placebo sessions was randomized and counter-balanced. Controls were also scanned twice, with no patch placement in either session., Results: While drug condition had no significant effect on reaction time, smokers were overall more accurate than controls. Moreover, nicotine significantly increased the response to intentional primes in brain regions known to mediate response readiness, e.g., inferior parietal lobe, supramarginal gyrus, and striatum., Conclusions: While limited to participant accuracy, these data suggest that the behavioral effects of nicotine in smokers are not only limited to information processing input (i.e., selective attention) but are also generalizable to output functions (i.e., motor intention). Moreover, nicotine's effects on intention appear to be mediated by a facilitation of function in brain regions associated with information processing output.

Rationale: Psychotropic medication affects cognition and brain function, making it a potential confounder in functional neuroimaging studies of psychiatric patients., Objective: To determine whether the sub-acute administration of an antidepressant (escitalopram) would induce differences in cognitive performance and associated brain function, which could be observed within the normal power of a functional imaging study., Materials and Methods: Healthy adults (N=10) received a short course of escitalopram (10 mg/day for 7 days). Participants performed a parametric working memory (WM) task during BOLD fMRI, both while medication-free and after medication. To control for order effects, the medication-free examination was completed by half the subjects before starting medication and by the other half at least one week after medication., Results: Escitalopram had no significant effect on WM accuracy or reaction time. Preliminary analysis of the imaging data revealed no significant (p(corrected)<0.05) differences in memory-load-dependent activation between conditions. However, small volume correction analysis of regions that were significant prior to correction for multiple comparisons highlighted between condition differences in regions likely to be susceptible to antidepressant effects (i.e. thalamus, anterior cingulate and inferior frontal gyrus)., Conclusions: These results suggest that the sub-acute administration of antidepressants in healthy controls does not affect cognitive or hemodynamic function in healthy adults to a magnitude greater than one standard deviation unit. Therefore, the confounding effect of antidepressants on signal intensity in imaging studies of medicated, depressed individuals may be limited.