Search

Objective: In-session processing of emotions is important in facilitating psychotherapeutic change. This study explores how clients in active treatment experience inner changes when sharing emotions in psychotherapy sessions. The aim was to retrieve in-depth knowledge about clients' moment-by-moment experiences of change in a naturalistic psychotherapy context., Method: Two psychotherapy sessions (session 3 or 4 and session 7 or 8) were videotaped and immediately followed by semi-structured interviews with clients ( n  = 11) in the format of Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR). Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis., Results: Four themes resulted from analysis: (1) reaching a new clarity about inner struggles; (2) a shift in how I approach and experience my feelings; (3) grieving losses and gaining a more positive understanding of myself; (4) feeling relief and liberation when allowing difficult emotions., Conclusion: The resulting themes took into account the importance of the felt quality of change experiences within sessions, which appears to be important in making micro-processes of change salient. Across themes, we found accounts of shifts in awareness and self-compassion, which we discuss as micro-outcomes that clients can ideally be guided to dwell with.

Objective: Using patient-generated quantitative data in psychotherapy (feedback) appears to enhance treatment outcome, but there is variability in its effect. Different ways and reasons to implement routine outcome measurement might explain such variability. The goal of this review is to address the insufficient knowledge on how these data are used by therapists and patients., Methods: The present study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of qualitative reports of therapists' and patients' experiences using patient-generated quantitative data during ongoing psychotherapy., Results: Four main categories of use were identified: (1) uses of patients' self-reported data as nomothetic/objective markers for assessment, process monitoring, and treatment planning; (2) intrapersonal uses that enhance self-awareness, initiate reflection, and influence patients' mood or responses; (3) uses that prompt interactional processes by facilitating communication, supporting exploration, creating ownership in patients, changing treatment focus, enhancing therapeutic alliance, or disturbing the psychotherapy process; and (4) patients responding for specific purposes due to uncertainty and interpersonal motives, or strategic responding to achieve a desired result., Conclusion: These results demonstrate that patient-reported data, when used in active psychotherapy, is very clearly not just an objective measurement of client functioning: the inclusion of patient-data has the potential to influence psychotherapy in numerous ways.

Objective To explore how patients and therapists in an outpatient specialized substance use disorder treatment setting experienced the first treatment session, and to identify relational facilitators and barriers seen from both patient and therapist perspectives. Method: The study is based on a qualitative approach and semi-structured interviews of patients ( n  = 12) and therapists ( n  = 12). Interviews were conducted soon after the first treatment session and analyzed in accordance with reflexive thematic analysis. Results: We identified subthemes for patients and therapists, respectively. In addition, we found that patients and therapists described certain comparable experiences and actions which we integrated as core themes: (a) feeling uncertain about what to expect; (b) forming first impressions; (c) balancing multiple concurrent concerns; (d) seeking feedback from the other; and (e) sensing a way forward. The subthemes specify patients' and therapists' unique meanings and approaches to each core theme. Finally, we summarized unique and shared relational facilitators and barriers. Conclusion: Patients and therapists use the first session to form an impression of the other, but they are also concerned with the impression they themselves give. They, therefore, monitor the other's in-session reactions and responses which constitute facilitators or barriers for their own further relational actions.

Objective: There is a growing interest in idiographic patient-reported outcome measures (I-PROMs) for routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and clinical feedback (CF) in psychotherapy, but to our knowledge, no systematic reviews of the empirical literature. Method: We conducted a systematic literature search for empirical papers investigating effects and experiences of I-PROMs for ROM/CF and found a total of 13 papers. There was only one experimental controlled effectiveness study. Results: We formulated a narrative summary of the data set as a whole. We conducted a secondary analysis of nine papers containing qualitative data on stakeholder experiences with I-PROMs and found three superordinate themes and eight subthemes, summarized as "I-PROMs can facilitate self-reflection for patients, assist in identifying and tracking therapeutic topics, and make patients more committed to therapy by giving them a greater sense of responsibility and empowerment. Formulating goals and problems can be difficult, and lack of progress can be demotivating. Time in therapy is precious and must be spent wisely. Effective use of I-PROMs is facilitated by flexibility and therapists' use of clinical skills." Conclusion: We discuss the limitations of the study and provide recommendations for future research and clinical practice.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore moments during psychotherapy sessions in which clients experience that they have an opportunity to approach and engage with difficult topics and emotional experiences, with the aim of describing therapists' acts that support clients' in-session engagement., Methods: Two treatment sessions of 11 participants were videotaped and immediately followed by an in-depth semi-structured interview, using the interpersonal process recall (IPR) interview method. A follow-up interview was conducted 3 months after the final IPR interview. Participants' accounts were analyzed using thematic analyses., Results: Five themes of engagement-supportive acts resulted from our analyses: 1. inviting the client by showing acceptance; 2. recognizing the clients' hints and try-out signs; 3. providing information on the process and evaluating clients' expectations; 4. actively helping the clients to notice and stay with difficult experience and 5. showing sensitivity to the client's needs for micropauses. We discuss these themes as acts of recognition., Conclusion: Clients found it was engagement-supportive when therapists implicitly and explicitly recognized the challenges of being in psychotherapy. This recognition could be achieved through the engagement-supportive acts described in the five themes. Therapists should continually make space for and seek a balance between different engagement-supportive acts.

The practice of routine outcome monitoring and providing clinical feedback has been widely studied within psychotherapy. Nevertheless, there are many outstanding questions regarding this practice. Is it an evidence-based adjunct to ongoing psychotherapies, or an ineffective complication of treatment? If it is effective, through what mechanism(s) does it act? Is it effective with all patient populations, treatment types, and service delivery mechanisms, or does its impact vary across context? What choices in the implementation process affect the utility of patient-reported data feedback on psychotherapy outcomes? The studies in this special section explore these questions using a wide variety of methods and significantly expand the reach of studies on feedback. Together, these studies represent a snapshot of a maturing field of study: Initial discoveries are developed into more robust theories and applied in a wider range of contexts, while the limits of that theory are tested. They also signal directions for future clinical and research work that may improve patient care in psychosocial interventions into the future.

ABSTRACT Purpose: Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and clinical feedback systems (CFS) are becoming prevalent in mental health services, but there are several challenges to successful implementation. ROM/CFS seem to be helpful for some patients, but not for others. To investigate this, we explored patients' experiences with ROM/CFS as an interpersonal and psychotherapeutic process, in naturalistic settings. Method: We used video-assisted interpersonal process recall interviews to investigate the experiences of 12 patients using ROM/CFS in a Norwegian mental health outpatient clinic. Data were analyzed through systematic text condensation. Results: Our analysis resulted in three pairs of experiences with ROM/CFS: (1) Explicit vs. implicit use of information, (2) Directing focus towards or away from therapeutic topics, and (3) Giving and receiving feedback. These experiences could be helpful or hindering, depending on participants' needs and preferences. All participants needed to know that the CFS was used in a meaningful way. If not, it could be detrimental to the therapeutic process. Conclusion: In order to be helpful for patients, ROM/CFS should be used in a way that is flexible, meaningful to patients, and sensitive to individual needs and preferences. Future research should further explore this how-to aspect of ROM/CFS with different CFS and populations.

Background: The perceived benefits of drug use are not currently integrated into the treatment of substance use disorder. This omission appears paradoxical and is unsubstantiated by empirical research. As the perceived benefits of drug use are catalysts for drug initiation, relapse and continuous use, increased knowledge about these benefits seems crucial to efficacious treatment. Aims: To investigate the perceived benefits of drug use in substance use disorder. Method: The study is a phenomenological-hermeneutical investigation using thematic analysis of interviews with 30 long-term recovered adult service users. Results: Our thematic analysis resulted in three themes and several sub-themes: (1) Benefits of drug use; (2) Necessity of intense experiences; and (3) Importance of being unconventional. Conclusions: Findings indicate that the benefits of non-problematic and problematic drug use are motivated by similar individual and social needs. An absolute distinction between problematic and non-problematic drug use thus seems arbitrary and potentially counterproductive for clinical practice. The benefits of drug use should be researched as a possible add-on treatment module, as this knowledge may be of significant clinical value in treatment frameworks.

Objective: The aim of this study was to gain knowledge about how the integration of personal and professional experiences affects therapeutic work. Method : Therapists ( N  = 14) who had been recommended by their leaders at their individual workplaces were interviewed twice with semi-structured qualitative interviews, which were then subjected to thematic and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Results: All the therapists in the sample described their personal qualities as an experienced tension between their personal strengths and vulnerabilities in the therapeutic setting. This tension came to expression through four subordinate themes: (a) The tension between perceiving oneself as a helper while dealing with one's own needs for attention and care; (b) The tension between the ability for embodied listening to the patient while tuning into oneself; (c) The tension between staying present while handling aggression and rejection from clients; and (d) The tension in striving for a constructive balance between closeness and distance. Conclusion: The results point to ways in which the personal selves of the therapists may affect their professional role performance. Drawing upon previous research and literature on the topic, the paper discusses how therapists' personal qualities are experienced as affecting their work and suggests several implications for psychotherapy training and practice.

Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and clinical feedback (CF) systems have become important tools for psychological therapies, but there are challenges for their successful implementation., Objective: To overcome these challenges, a greater understanding is needed about how patients experience the use of ROM/CF., Method: We conducted a systematic literature search of qualitative studies on patient experiences with the use of ROM/CF in mental health services., Results: The findings from 16 studies were synthesized, resulting in four meta-themes: (1) Suspicion towards service providers, (2) Flexibility and support to capture complexity, (3) Empowering patients, and (4) Developing collaborative practice., Conclusions: We discuss the implications of these meta-themes for further development and implementation of ROM/CF into clinical practice, acknowledging the limitations of our review and suggesting avenues for further research. Clinical or methodological significance of this article: This article provides useful and actionable knowledge about the patient perspective on ROM/CF, an important discussion on the current state of research in this area, and useful and concrete suggestions for further avenues of research.

Routine outcome monitoring and clinical feedback systems (ROM/CFSs) are promising methods of providing naturalistic research data and enhancing mental health care. However, implementation in routine care is challenging, and we need more knowledge about clinicians' and patients' needs from such systems., Objective: We aimed to study perspectives of clinicians and patients to explore how ROM/CFS can be helpful and acceptable to them., Method: We interviewed 55 participants in focus groups and individual interviews and analyzed the data through rigorous team-based qualitative analyses., Results: We report 3 overarching domains: (a) Shared needs, (b) Specific patient needs, and (c) Specific therapist needs. Shared needs, in which perspectives of different stakeholders converge, was the dominant domain in the material. Under each domain, we report 3 specific themes: (a1) Degree of trust in therapy, (a2) Allowing for openness, (a3) Monitoring joint objectives; (b1) Life functioning, (b2) Canary in the coal mine, (b3) Holistic report; and (c1) Emotional presence and style, (c2) Monitoring risk and symptoms, and (c3) Agency and ownership of process., Conclusions: In what should increase our confidence toward core aspects of ROM, we suggest that an integration of relational feedback concepts and stringent clinical dimension tracking into the ROM/CFS can be beneficial.

Objective: What works for whom in mindfulness-based group interventions for social anxiety disorder (SAD)? The present article compared the experiences of 14 participants in a clinical study of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) for young adults with SAD., Methods: A two-staged mixed methods design was used to identify the participants who reported the highest (n = 7) and lowest (n = 7) levels of symptomatic change on outcome measures after treatment, and analyze qualitative in-depth interviews to explore what they experienced as helpful and unhelpful during the MBSR program. The qualitative interviews were analyzed using a thematic analysis methodology., Results: We identified the global theme of (i) Discovering agency to change or not feeling empowered through the MBSR program, and four sub-themes: (ii) Forming an active commitment or feeling ambivalence toward learning mindfulness, (iii) Engaging with others or avoiding contact with the group, (iv) Using the mindfulness exercises to approach or resigning when facing unpleasant experiences, and (v) Using the course to break interpersonal patterns or remaining stuck in everyday life., Conclusions: MBSR may be helpful for young adults with SAD, although it may be important to match clients to their preferred form of treatment.

Objective: To investigate how psychotherapists' lives and relationships are influenced by their work., Method: Twelve senior psychotherapists took part in qualitative interviews., Results: Thematic analysis yielded four significant themes: (i) it has been a privilege to know and contribute, and to be allowed to grow personally; (ii) facing suffering and destructiveness has been a burden; (iii) being a therapist has had an impact on my personal relationships-for better and worse; and (iv) I have needed to construct a way of living that allowed me to continue to do the work., Conclusion: Working as a therapist seem to imply a potential for developing openness, tolerance, and creativity, while being vulnerable to becoming overwhelmed with responsibility and feelings of inadequacy, isolation, and despair.

The aim of this study was to explore how adolescents in ongoing psychotherapies prefer their therapists to interact with them when they are establishing a therapeutic bond. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were held with 14 patients. A hermeneutic-phenomenological approach was used to analyze interview transcripts. The participants' descriptions of important experiential dimensions in their interaction with their therapists clustered around five themes: the adolescents (1) feeling vulnerable and ambivalent in relationship with a potential helper when therapy started; the therapists (2) showed them that they were comfortable with being a therapist (3), strengthened their autonomy by establishing therapeutic boundaries, (4) showed that they recognized patients' individuality by respecting their personal boundaries, (5) helped them make their experiences understandable and meaningful, and (6) allowed mutuality and emotional closeness.

Interviews were conducted to explore the recall of impasse experiences of 12 highly skilled and experienced therapists. Participants were interviewed in depth individually about a specific impasse from their experience that resolved successfully. The transcribed interviews were analysed using qualitative methodology. The authors found that participants understood their reported impasse experiences as important for their professional development. The category of "helpful subjective presence" describes the mode of being with patients that the participants found therapeutic. The categories of "losing hope" and "difficult feelings in the therapist in the here and now" are processes that threaten the helpful presence. The participants' inner work on the two latter categories is identified as a key to the successful resolution of impasses.