Search

The EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life (the Study Group) has adopted a modular approach to quality of life (QOL) assessment in cancer clinical trials. A 'core' instrument-the QLQ-C30-has been designed to cover a range of QOL issues relevant to a broad spectrum of cancer patients. It is intended that this QLQ-C30 be supplemented by more specific subscales ('modules') to assess aspects of QOL of particular importance to specific subgroups of patients. Since individual members of the Study Group were to be involved in module development, guidelines were required to standardize the module development process in order to ensure uniformly high quality across modules. These guidelines are presented in this paper. The term 'module' is defined, the composition of modules is outlined, and the criteria used to develop modules are specified. The module development process, consisting of four phases (generation of relevant QOL issues, operationalization of the QOL issues into a set of items, pretesting the module questionnaire, and large-scale field-testing) is described in detail. Further, issues related to cross-cultural instrument development, and the need for monitoring the module development process from within the Study Group are discussed. Finally, experiences with developing two site-specific modules (i.e., for head and neck, and breast cancer), are presented and the extent to which the guidelines meet practical requirements is discussed. The guidelines appear to provide a practical tool for module construction, that can facilitate the development of a comprehensive system for assessing the QOL of cancer patients internationally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to derive population-based norms for women completing the EORTC QLQ-C30 version 1 which is designed for use with patients who have cancer. The study was conducted using two different questionnaires: one designed for use in female patients with breast cancer, the other for those with gynaecological cancers, but both including the EORTC QLQ-C30. The women were drawn from the Danish Central Population Register without knowledge of their health status and divided at random between the two questionnaires. All procedures for collecting data were identical. The response rate for those receiving the gynaecological cancer (GS) questionnaire was 49% and it was 71% for the breast cancer (BS) questionnaire. Detailed comparison between the two samples revealed several EORTC QLQ-C30 items showing a clear difference in distribution of scores between them. Because of this and the possible bias due to the relative low age-related response rate in GS, only the results from the BS are used for constructing norms. The norms cover all 30 single items on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the nine derived scales, for women in four 10-year age groups commencing at 30 years and for those aged 70-75. Clear trends in, for example, declining ability to undertake strenuous activity are illustrated and quantified. Levels of certain symptoms, such as pain, are surprisingly high although it is recognized that the population sampled will contain a proportion of women with active disease including cancer. We recommend the use of these norms both as an aid to the clinical assessment of an individual patient, and to assist in the interpretation of clinical trial and longitudinal quality of life data. As a secondary result, we note that a population-based sample will have a lower response rate to a questionnaire with more questions, especially if many of these extra questions are on sexual issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]