Search

This study assesses the medium‐range flow‐dependent forecast skill of Euro‐Atlantic weather regimes: the positive and negative phases of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO+ and NAO−), Atlantic ridge (ATLR), and Euro‐Atlantic blocking (EABL), for extended winters (November–March) in the periods 2006/2007–2013/2014 and 1985/1986–2013/2014 using The Interactive Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)'s Global Ensemble Forecasting System (GEFS) reforecast datasets, respectively. The models show greater‐than‐observed (smaller‐than‐observed) frequencies of NAO− and ATLR (NAO+) with forecast lead time. The increased frequency of NAO− is not due to its excess persistence but due to more frequent transitions mainly from ATLR, but also from NAO+. In turn, NAO+ is under‐persistent. The models show the highest probabilistic skill for forecasts initialised on NAO− and the NAO− forecasts during the TIGGE period. However, the GEFS reforecast during the period 1985/1986–2013/2014 revealed that these recent high skills reflect the occurrence of four long‐lasting (>30 days) NAO− events in 2009/2010–2013/2014 and that the skill for forecasts initialised on NAO− before 2009/2010 (the longest duration was 22 days and the second‐longest 16 days) was the lowest. The longer the NAO− events persist, the higher the skill of forecasts initialised on NAO−. The skill dependency on regime duration is less clearly observed for the other regimes. In addition, the GEFS reforecast also revealed that the highest skill of the NAO− forecasts during the period 1985/1986–2013/2014 is attributed to the higher skill of the NAO− forecasts during the active NAO− periods. The EABL forecasts initialised on ATLR show the lowest skill, followed by the NAO− (EABL) forecasts initialised on NAO+ or ATLR (NAO+). These results suggest that the recent models still have difficulties in predicting the onset of blocking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Stochastically Perturbed Parametrization Tendencies (SPPT) scheme is used at weather and climate forecasting centres worldwide to represent model uncertainty that arises from simplifications involved in the parametrization process. It uses spatio-temporally correlated multiplicative noise to perturb the sum of the parametrized tendencies. However, SPPT does not distinguish between different parametrization schemes, which do not necessarily have the same error characteristics. A generalization to SPPT is proposed, whereby the tendency from each parametrization scheme can be perturbed using an independent stochastic pattern. This acknowledges that the forecast errors arising from different parametrizations are not perfectly correlated. Two variations of this 'independent SPPT' (iSPPT) approach are tested in the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS). The first perturbs all parametrized tendencies independently, while the second groups tendencies before perturbation. The iSPPT schemes lead to statistically significant improvements in forecast reliability in the Tropics in medium-range weather forecasts. This improvement can be attributed to a large, beneficial increase in ensemble spread in regions with significant convective activity. The iSPPT schemes also lead to improved forecast skill in the extratropics for a set of cases in which the synoptic initial conditions were more likely to result in European 'forecast busts'. Longer 13 month simulations are also considered to indicate the effect of iSPPT on the mean climate of the IFS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Forecast verification is important across scientific disciplines, as it provides a framework for evaluating the performance of a forecasting system. In the atmospheric sciences, probabilistic skill scores are often used for verification, as they provide a way of ranking the performance of different probabilistic forecasts unambiguously. In order to be useful, a skill score must be proper: it must encourage honesty in the forecaster and reward forecasts that are reliable and have good resolution. A new score, the error-spread score (ES), is proposed, which is particularly suitable for evaluation of ensemble forecasts. It is formulated with respect to the moments of the forecast. The ES is confirmed to be a proper score and is therefore sensitive to both resolution and reliability. The ES is tested on forecasts made using the Lorenz ′96 system and found to be useful for summarizing the skill of the forecasts. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ensemble prediction system (EPS) is evaluated using the ES. Its performance is compared with a perfect statistical probabilistic forecast: the ECMWF high-resolution deterministic forecast dressed with the observed error distribution. This generates a forecast that is perfectly reliable if considered over all time, but does not vary from day to day with the predictability of the atmospheric flow. The ES distinguishes between the dynamically reliable EPS forecasts and the statically reliable dressed deterministic forecasts. Other skill scores are tested and found to be comparatively insensitive to this desirable forecast quality. The ES is used to evaluate seasonal range ensemble forecasts made with the ECMWF System 4. The ensemble forecasts are found to be skilful when compared with climatological or persistence forecasts, though this skill is dependent on the region and time of year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Forecasts provided by the THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE) project were compared with reforecast-calibrated ensemble predictions from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) in extratropical regions. Considering the statistical performance of global probabilistic forecasts of 850 hPa and 2 m temperatures, a multimodel ensemble containing nine ensemble prediction systems (EPS) from the TIGGE archive did not improve on the performance of the best single-model, the ECMWF EPS. However, a reduced multimodel system, consisting of only the four best ensemble systems, provided by Canada, the USA, the United Kingdom and ECMWF, showed an improved performance. The multimodel ensemble provides a benchmark for the single-model systems contributing to the multimodel. However, reforecast-calibrated ECMWF EPS forecasts were of comparable or superior quality to the multimodel predictions, when verified against two different reanalyses or observations. This improved performance was achieved by using the ECMWF reforecast dataset to correct for systematic errors and spread deficiencies. The ECMWF EPS was the main contributor for the improved performance of the multimodel ensemble; that is, if the multimodel system did not include the ECMWF contribution, it was not able to improve on the performance of the ECMWF EPS alone. These results were shown to be only marginally sensitive to the choice of verification dataset. Copyright © 2012 Royal Meteorological Society [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]