Search

This study intends to evaluate the different lung CT scan protocols used for the diagnostic evaluation of COVID-19-induced lung disease in Iranian imaging centers in terms of radiation dose and image quality. After data collecting, subjective image quality, radiation dose and objective image quality such as noise, SNR and CNR were assessed. Statistically significant differences in effective dose and image quality were evident among different lung CT protocols. Lowest and highest effective dose was1.31 ± 0.53 mSv related to a protocol with activated AEC (reference mAs = 20) and 6.15 ± 0.57 mSv related to a protocol with Fixed mAs (mAs = 100), respectively. A protocol with enabled tube current modulation with 70 mAs as a reference mAs, and protocol with 20 mAs and enabled AEC had the best and lowest image quality, respectively. To optimize the scan parameters, AEC must be used, and a range of tube currents (between 20 and 50 mAs) can produce acceptable images in terms of diagnostic quality and radiation dose for the diagnosis of COVID-19-induced lung disease.

We aimed to develop a software for facilitating absorbed dose per pixel (pixel dose) calculation using a size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). We calculated the pixel dose at nine equal points inserted into the radiophotoluminescence glass dosemeter (RPLD) and compared the pixel dose with the measured doses using RPLD. With this method, the relative errors of average pixel dose was -0.1% for adults and 2.86, 3.36 and 1.17% for those aged 10, 5 and 1 years without tube current modulation, respectively. In contrast, the relative error of SSDE was 17.37% for adults and 20.38, 20.73 and 19.20% for those aged 10, 5 and 1 years, respectively. In other words, the pixel dose was almost equal to the measured doses. Therefore, our software can be useful for determining arbitrary point.

The aim of the study was to compare the absorbed doses and image quality of organ-based tube current modulation (OBTCM) and bismuth shielding of breasts and thyroid against regular tube current modulation in chest CT scan. An anthropomorphic phantom and MOSFET dosemeters were used to evaluate absorbed doses. Image quality was assessed from HU and noise. Relative to the reference scan, the average absorbed dose reduction with OBTCM was 5.2% and with bismuth shields 24.2%. Difference in HU values compared to the reference varied between −4.1 and 4.2 HU in OBTCM scan and between −22.2 and 118.6 HU with bismuth shields. Image noise levels varied between 10.0 to 26.3 HU in the reference scan, from 9.6 to 27.7 HU for the OBTCM scan and from 11.9 to 43.9 HU in the bismuth scan. The use of bismuth shields provided greatest dose reduction compared to the investigated OBTCM.

The aim of this study is to estimate tube current modulation (TCM) profiles in paediatric computed tomography (CT) examinations with a TCM scheme (Volume-EC) and evaluate the estimation accuracy of TCM profiles. Another aim is to validate organ doses calculated using Monte Carlo-based CT dosimetry software and estimated TCM profiles by comparing them with those measured using 5-year-old and 10-year-old anthropomorphic phantoms and radio-photoluminescence glass dosemeters. Dose calculations were performed by inputting detailed descriptions of a CT scanner, scan parameters and CT images of the phantoms into the software. Organ doses were evaluated from the calculated dose distribution images. Average relative differences (RDs) between the estimated and actual TCM profiles ranged from -3.6 to 5.6%. RDs between the calculated and measured organ doses ranged from -4.2 to 13.0% and -18.1 to 4.9% for 5-year-old and 10-year-old phantoms, respectively. These results validate dose calculations for paediatric CT scans using TCM.

Computed tomography (CT) scanners are equipped with automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) systems that adjust the current to compensate for variations in patient attenuation. CT dosimetry variables are not defined for ATCM situations and, thus, only the averaged values are displayed and analysed. The patient effective dose (E), which is derived from a weighted sum of organ equivalent doses, will be modified by the ATCM. Values for E for chest-abdomen-pelvis CT scans have been calculated using the ImPACT spreadsheet for patients on five CT scanners. Values for E resulting from the z-axis modulation under ATCM have been compared with results assessed using the same effective mAs values with constant tube currents. Mean values for E under ATCM were within ±10 % of those for fixed tube currents for all scanners. Cumulative dose distributions under ATCM have been simulated for two patient scans using single-slice dose profiles measured in elliptical and cylindrical phantoms on one scanner. Contributions to the effective dose from organs in the upper thorax under ATCM are 30-35 % lower for superficial tissues (e.g. breast) and 15-20 % lower for deeper organs (e.g. lungs). The effect on doses to organs in the abdomen depends on body shape, and they can be 10-22 % higher for larger patients. Results indicate that scan dosimetry parameters, dose-length product and effective mAs averaged over the whole scan can provide an assessment in terms of E that is sufficiently accurate to quantify relative risk for routine patient exposures under ATCM.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of tube current modulation for dose estimation of a body computed tomography (CT) examination using a simulation tool. The authors also compared longitudinal variations in tube current values between iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back-projection (FBP) reconstruction algorithms. One hundred patients underwent body CT examinations. The tube current values around 10 organ regions were recorded longitudinally from tube current information. The organ and effective doses were simulated by average tube current values and longitudinal modulated tube current values. The organ doses for the bladder and breast estimated by longitudinal modulated tube current values were 20 % higher and 25 % lower than those estimated using the average tube current values, respectively. The differences in effective doses were small (mean, 0.7 mSv). The longitudinal variations in tube current values were almost the same for the IR and FBP algorithms.

The aims of this study were to estimate tube current values for each X-ray projection angle used in adult chest computed tomography (CT) and abdomen-pelvis CT examinations with tube current modulation (TCM) and to validate organ doses determined using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations through comparisons with the doses measured using in-phantom dosimetry. For dose simulations, dose distribution images were obtained by inputting the geometry of a CT scanner, scan parameters including estimated TCM curves and CT images of an adult anthropomorphic phantom into MC simulation software. Organ doses were then determined from the dose distribution images. For dose measurements, organ doses were evaluated using radio-photoluminescence glass dosemeters located at various organ positions within the phantom. Relative differences between the simulated and measured organ doses were -2.5 to 11.0% and -1.5 to 10.5% for organs in chest and abdomen-pelvis CT scan ranges, respectively. Thus, the simulated and measured doses agreed well.

The aim of this study was to compare dose and image quality (IQ) of a baseline low-dose computed tomography (CT) (fix mAs) vs. an ultra-low-dose CT (automatic tube current modulation, ATCM) in patients with suspected urinary stone disease and to assess the added value of iterative reconstruction. CT examination was performed on 193 patients (103 baseline low-dose, 90 ultra-low-dose). Filtered back projection (FBP) was used for both protocols, and Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) was used for the ultra-low-dose protocol only. Dose and ureter stones information were collected for both protocols. Subjective IQ was assessed by two radiologists scoring noise, visibility of the ureter and overall IQ. Objective IQ (contrast-to-noise ratio, CNR) was assessed for the ultra-low-dose protocol only (FBP and SAFIRE). The ultra-low-dose protocol (ATCM) showed a 22% decrease in mean effective dose (p

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the localizer and scan direction on the dose-reducing efficacy of the automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) in computed tomography (CT). Craniocaudal and caudocranial chest CT scans, based on anterior-posterior (AP), posterior-anterior (PA), lateral (LAT) or dual AP/LAT localizers, of an anthropomorphic phantom containing thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), were made on three Siemens systems. TLD readings were converted to lung and thyroid doses. A second dose estimation was performed based on Monte Carlo simulations. In addition, the ATCM behaviour of GE and Toshiba was evaluated based on AP, PA and LAT localizers. Compared with AP, tube currents of PA and AP/LAT scans were on average 20 % higher and 40 % lower, respectively, for the Siemens systems. Consequently, thyroid and lung doses increased with 60 % with a PA instead of an AP/LAT scan, with significant differences in image noise. Moreover, the thyroid dose halves by taking the scan in caudocranial direction. Noise values were not significantly different when changing scan direction.

The purpose of this study is to present a national survey that was performed in Greece for the establishment of national Dose Reference Levels (DRLs) for seven common adult Computed Tomography (CT) examinations. Volumetric computed tomography dose index and dose-length product values were collected from the post-data page of 65 'modern' systems that incorporate tube current modulation. Moreover, phantom dose measurements on 26 'older' systems were performed. Finally, the effective dose to the patient from a typical acquisition during these examinations was estimated. The suggested national DRLs are generally comparable with respective published values from similar European studies, with the exception of sinuses CT, which presents significantly higher values. This fact, along with the large variation of the systems' dose values that were observed even for scanners of the same type, indicates a need for further patient protection optimisation without compromising the clinical outcome.

To investigate the radiation dose to the fetus using retrospective tube current modulation (TCM) data selected from archived clinical records. This paper describes the calculation of fetal doses using retrospective TCM data and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Three TCM schemes were adopted for use with three pregnant patient phantoms. MC simulations were used to model CT scanners, TCM schemes and pregnant patients. Comparisons between organ doses from TCM schemes and those from non-TCM schemes show that these three TCM schemes reduced fetal doses by 14, 18 and 25 %, respectively. These organ doses were also compared with those from ImPACT calculation. It is found that the difference between the calculated fetal dose and the ImPACT reported dose is as high as 46 %. This work demonstrates methods to study organ doses from various TCM protocols and potential ways to improve the accuracy of CT dose calculation for pregnant patients.

Combined tube current modulation techniques (such as Care Dose4D used in this study) during computed tomography (CT) procedures bring together the benefits of the angular and z-axis modulation techniques, measuring X-ray attenuation profile in the z-axis together with the data from the perpendicular x-y direction with a sophisticated algorithm. The purpose of this study was to investigate the radiation dose, in terms of computed tomography dose index (CTDI(vol)), delivered to patients during thoracic and abdominal CT using this technique and compare it with the corresponding CTDI(vol) of the fixed tube current CT technique. The results revealed a 5-32% dose reduction for chest CT and a dose reduction of 7.6-60% for the three-sequence abdominal CT scan of normal and overweight patients. In the case of obese patients a 15.4-18.7% dose increase for chest CT and a (-1.5) - (26.3)% dose increase for the three-stage abdominal examinations for females and males, respectively, was revealed.

The authors measured organ radiation doses during multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) chest scans using a China Sichuan anthropomorphic phantom (CDP-1C). Chest CT images from live volunteers based on automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) techniques were similar to those obtained using the CDP-1C phantom, indicating that the phantom accurately modelled the anatomic structure and X-ray absorbance of the human torso. Indeed, attenuation values differed by

Spinal deformities affect young individuals predominantly girls who are usually subjected to regular and intensive radiological investigation especially before and after corrective surgery. Optimisation of spine computed tomography (CT) and the implementation of the low-dose CT in the work-up of spinal deformities were presented. The presented low-dose CT here means providing the operating surgeons with essential information about 15 vertebral bodies (almost 36-cm long region of the vertebral column). The mean effective dose of the low-dose CT was 0.37 mSv without any negative impact on image quality with regard to answering the clinical questions at issue. Tube current modulation (angular and longitudinal) has contributed to 19 % of the total dose reduction and soft tissue algorithm has helped to reduce the artefacts from the metal implants in the postoperative CTs.

A new concept of an on-line anatomically adapted modulation (OAC) of the tube current has been investigated and compared with the pre-programmed sinusoidal modulation (PSC), by measuring Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI)-figures and image noise in phantoms. The on-line adapted dose modulation optimally exploits the asymmetry of the object resulting in a considerable dose saving of up to 70% in phantoms and up to 40% in patients. Structured noise in the direction of maximum attenuation is reduced. It turns out that OAC is markedly superior to PSC with respect to dose reduction and improved image quality.