Search

Objective: This study, derived from the phase 3 SAFE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT2236806), explores subclinical cardiac damage in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy and left-sided breast radiation therapy (RT)., Materials and Methods: Eligible patients were randomized to a cardioprotective pharmacological therapy (bisoprolol, ramipril, or both) or placebo, with cardiac surveillance at multiple time-point using standard and 3-dimensional echocardiography. Dosimetric parameters were analysed, including mean heart dose (MHD) and various metrics for heart substructures, employing advanced contouring techniques and auto-contouring software., Results: In the analysis of left-sided breast RT patients, the study encompassed 39 out of 46 irradiated individuals, focusing on GLS and 3D-LVEF outcomes with ≥ 10% worsening, defined as subclinical heart damage. Distinct RT schedules were used, with placebo exhibiting the highest ≥ 10% worsening (36.4%). In terms of treatment arms, bisoprolol exhibited 11.1% worsening, while ramipril 16.7% and bisoprolol + ramipril 25%. For patients with no subclinical damage, the mean MHD was 1.5 Gy; for patients with subclinical heart damage, the mean MHD was 1.6 Gy (p = 0.94). Dosimetric parameters related to heart and heart substructures (left anterior descending artery, right and left atrium, right and left ventricle) showed no statistically significant differences between patients with and without subclinical damage., Conclusion: Our results emphasize the crucial role of cardioprotective measures in mitigating adverse effects, highlighting RT as having negligible influence on cardiac performance. An extended follow-up assessment of the whole series is warranted to determine whether a subclinical effect could significantly influence clinical outcomes and cardiac events., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: Icro Meattini declares occasional small fees received for advisory boards supported by Eli Lilly, Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, SeaGen, Pfizer, and Menarini StemLine. Roberto Pellegrini is an employee of Elekta AB (Stockholm, Sweden). Isacco Desideri, Jacopo Nori, and Lorenzo Livi are editors in this journal. Ethical approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of University of Florence. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent to publish: The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication., (© 2024. Italian Society of Medical Radiology.)

Introduction: A multicenter phase II study for assessing the efficacy and the toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy with SIB plus temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma was carried out by the Brain Study Group of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology., Methods: Twenty-four patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma belonging to Recursive Partitioning Analysis classes III and IV were enrolled. The prescribed dose was 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions of 3.5 Gy and 67.5 in 15 fractions of 4.5 Gy to the SIB volume. Dose constraints for the hypofractionated schedule were provided. Radiotherapy was associated with concomitant and sequential temozolomide., Results: Median overall survival (OS) was 15.1 months, while median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.6 months. Actuarial OS at 12 months was 65.6% ± 0.09, whereas actuarial PFS at 12 months was 41.2% ± 0.10. Status of methylation of MGMT promoter resulted to be a significant prognostic factor for OS. Radiotherapy-related acute toxicity was not relevant. Three patients (12.5%) had G3 myelotoxicity that required temozolomide temporary interruption or dose reduction during the chemotherapy. However, chemotherapy was not definitely discontinued for toxicity in any case. One patient out of 24 (4.2%) developed radionecrosis that required surgical resection with no evidence of disease in the surgical specimen., Conclusions: This trial confirms that hypofractionated radiotherapy with SIB and association with temozolomide may be a reasonable and feasible option for good prognosis patients with GBM.

Purpose: Radiosurgery (RS) is a well-established treatment in selected patients with brain metastasis. The aim of this study is to compare the differences between CyberKnife (CK) and TomoTherapy (HT) treatment plans of RS of single brain metastasis (BM) to define when HT should be used in cases beyond Cyberknife-when both systems are readily available for the radiation oncologist., Methods and Materials: Nineteen patients with single brain metastasis treated with CK were re-planned for radiosurgery using TomoTherapy Hi-ART system. Two planning approaches have been used for TomoTherapy plans: the classical one (HT) and the improved conformity (icHT) that produces dose distributions more similar to those of RS plans. PTV coverage, Conformity Index (CI), Paddick Conformity Index (nCI), Homogeneity Index (HI), Gradient Index (GI), and beam on time of CK, HT, and icHT plans were evaluated and compared., Results: A good coverage was found for CK, HT, and icHT plans. A difference between mean HI of CK and icHT plans was observed (p = 0.007). Better dose gradients compared to both icHT and HT modalities were observed in CK plans. icHT modality showed improved mean CI respect to HT modality, similar to that obtained in CK plans., Conclusions: CK plans show higher conformity and lower GI than icHT and HT plans. TomoTherapy demonstrates the advantage of being a device capable to reach different clinical objectives depending on the different planning modality employed. CyberKnife and TomoTherapy are both optimal RS devices, the choice to use one over another has to be clinically guided.

Purpose: The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of the four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) in accelerated partial breast irradiation (aPBI) planning., Materials and Methods: At our Institute, we have been treating the index quadrant with external intensity-modulated radiation therapy in a phase III trial. For this study, we selected a sample of 10 patients with right- or left-sided breast cancer and surgical clips at the excision site. Contouring of the target was performed both using three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) and 4DCT imaging. On both 3DCT and 4DCT, we recorded the clinical target volume (CTV) and the planning target volume (PTV) and the coordinates of the PTV centroid. We calculated the treatment plans, according to our protocol, using the contours drawn on the 3DCT and 4DCT and evaluated target coverage and sparing of organs at risk (OAR)., Results: Median age of the patients was 63.5 years (range 52-75). The comparison between the 3DCT and 4DCT PTV volumes was not statistically significant (p = 0.79). Concerning centroid coordinates, the average absolute differences were 0.1 mm in the latero-lateral, 0.7 mm in the antero-posterior and 0.3 mm in the supero-inferior direction. No statistically significant differences were observed both in PTV coverage and OAR sparing; the 4D PTV contour is adequately covered when the plan based on the 3D contours is used. Target coverage was reduced on average by 1 % and no statistically significant difference was observed (p = 0.93)., Conclusions: In our experience, no significant differences between PTV volumes, PTV coverage, OAR sparing and centroid position are evidenced when comparing 3DCT and 4DCT plans. Conventional 3DCT-based planning is adequate for aPBI.

Purpose: In lung cancer, a high radiation dose to the target area correlates with better local control but is frequently counterbalanced by a higher risk of lung toxicity. Several methods exist to coordinate respiratory motion in lung radiotherapy. We aimed to investigate the impact of a breathing-control system on irradiated volumes and dosimetric parameters in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatments., Materials and Methods: Twelve patients were scheduled for radical radiotherapy: five for SRT and seven for 3D-CRT. For each patient, in addition to the free-breathing computed tomography (CT) scan, four additional sets of CT slices were acquired using the Active Breathing Coordinator device (ABC, Elekta Oncology Systems Ltd., UK)., Results: The volumes acquired with the ABC device were significantly smaller than the free-breathing volumes [23 % reduction of planning tumour volume (PTV), p = 0.002]. ABC allowed a reduction of all dosimetric parameters [2.28 % reduction of percentage volume of lung treated to a dose of ≥ 20 Gy (V20), p = 0.004; 10 % reduction of mean lung dose (MLD), p = 0.009]. Significant differences were found both in SRT and in 3D-CRT, in peripheral and apical lesions., Conclusion: In our experience, ABC has the potential to reduce lung toxicity in the treatment of lung cancer; alternatively, it can allow the prescribed dose to be increased while maintaining the same risk of lung toxicity.

Purpose: This study sought to evaluate acute toxicity and local control in patients who underwent extracranial stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for paracardiac and cardiac metastatic lesions, defined as such when located at a maximum distance of 1 cm from the heart or inside its parenchyma., Materials and Methods: Between January 2009 and May 2011, 16 patients with paracardiac and cardiac lesions were treated with SBRT. For dose specification, in 15 of 16 patients, the prescription dosage was 36 Gy in three fractions (70% isodose). In one patient, the target lesion was inside the heart, and the prescription dosage was 30 Gy in three fractions (70% isodose)., Results: Regarding response to stereotactic radiotherapy, we recorded one (6%) complete response (CR), six (37%) partial responses (PR), five (32%) stable disease (SD) and four (25%) local failures. Median interval to local failure was 5.2 (range, 3-12) months. The cause of death was distant progression of disease in all four patients. Compliance to treatment was excellent; no patient developed cardiological symptoms or electrocardiographic abnormalities, even months after SBRT., Conclusions: Results of our retrospective study indicate that SBRT represents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with cardiac and paracardiac metastases.

Purpose: This study was done to evaluate the toxicity related to concurrent radiotherapy and anthracycline (AC)-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer and to investigate the impact of treatment interruptions and the feasibility of this uncommon therapeutic approach., Materials and Methods: From September 2002 to December 2007, 60 patients were treated at our Centre. The mean age at presentation was 48.5 (range 38-64) years. All patients underwent conservative surgery, and radiotherapy to the entire breast (mean dose 50 Gy; range 46-52 Gy). AC-based regimens consisted of four cycles of AC (doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide) or four cycles of epirubicin (EPI) followed by four courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF)., Results: Concomitant treatment caused acute skin G3 toxicity in 8.9% of patients and one case of G4 toxicity (1.7%). Concerning cardiac assessment, six of the 56 evaluable patients (10.7%) developed an asymptomatic decline of left ventricular ejection fraction >10% and <20% of the baseline value. Radiotherapy was temporarily stopped in 21.3% and chemotherapy in 57.1% of patients., Conclusions: In our experience, concomitant chemotherapy did not emerge as a significant factor in radiotherapy interruption. Moreover, no severe cardiac events were recorded.