1. Consensus guidelines for the definition of time-to-event end points in image-guided tumor ablation
- Author
-
Puijk, Robbert, Ahmed, Muneeb, Adam, Andreas, Arai, Yasuaki, Arellano, Ronald, de Baère, Thierry, Bale, Reto, Bellera, Carine, Binkert, Christoph, Brace, Christopher, Breen, David, Brountzos, Elias, Callstrom, Matthew, Carrafiello, Gianpaolo, Chapiro, Julius, de Cobelli, Francesco, Coupé, Veerle, Crocetti, Laura, Denys, Alban, Dupuy, Damian, Erinjeri, Joseph, Filippiadis, Dimitris, Gangi, Afshin, Gervais, Debra, Gillams, Alice, Greene, Tissy, Guiu, Boris, Helmberger, Thomas, Iezzi, Roberto, Kang, Tae Wook, Kelekis, Alexis, Kim, Hyun, Kröncke, Thomas, Kwan, Sharon, Lee, Min Woo, Lee, Fred, Lee, Edward, Liang, Ping, Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit, Lu, David, Madoff, David, Mauri, Giovanni, Meloni, Maria Franca, Morgan, Robert, Nadolski, Gregory, Narayanan, Govindarajan, Newton, Isabel, Nikolic, Boris, Orsi, Franco, Pereira, Philippe, Pua, Uei, Rhim, Hyunchul, Ricke, Jens, Rilling, William, Salem, Riad, Scheffer, Hester, Sofocleous, Constantinos, Solbiati, Luigi, Solomon, Stephen, Soulen, Michael, Sze, Daniel, Uberoi, Raman, Vogl, Thomas, Wang, David, Wood, Bradford, Goldberg, S Nahum, Meijerink, Martijn, Goldberg, S. Nahum, Amsterdam UMC - Amsterdam University Medical Center, Harvard Medical School [Boston] (HMS), Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital [London], National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCJ), Department of radiology (Massachusetts General Hospital), Massachusetts General Hospital [Boston], Institut Gustave Roussy (IGR), Imagerie thérapeutique (radiologie interventionnelle), Département d'imagerie médicale [Gustave Roussy], Institut Gustave Roussy (IGR)-Institut Gustave Roussy (IGR), Innsbruck Medical University = Medizinische Universität Innsbruck (IMU), Institut Bergonié [Bordeaux], UNICANCER, Kantonsspital Winterthur (KSW), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Mayo Clinic [Rochester], Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Yale University [New Haven], IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele [Milan, Italy], Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre (VUMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (VU), University of Pisa - Università di Pisa, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois [Lausanne] (CHUV), Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), L'Institut hospitalo-universitaire de Strasbourg (IHU Strasbourg), Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-l'Institut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l'Appareil Digestif (IRCAD)-Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (HUS)-La Fédération des Crédits Mutuels Centre Est (FCMCE)-L'Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer (ARC)-La société Karl STORZ, The London Clinic cancer, Society of Interventional Oncology (SIO), Service de radiologie et d'Imagerie médicale diagnostique et thérapeutique (CHU de Dijon), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand (CHU Dijon), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier), University Medical Center of Schleswig–Holstein = Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), and Kiel University
- Subjects
Ablation Techniques ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Consensus ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,MESH: Societies, Medical ,MEDLINE ,Outcome (game theory) ,Session (web analytics) ,Quality of life (healthcare) ,Humans ,Neoplasms ,Reproducibility of Results ,Societies, Medical ,Medical ,medicine ,MESH: Neoplasms ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Medical physics ,ddc:610 ,MESH: Consensus ,License ,MESH: Humans ,Health economics ,business.industry ,MESH: Ablation Techniques ,Opinion leadership ,MESH: Reproducibility of Results ,Clinical trial ,business ,Societies - Abstract
International audience; There is currently no consensus regarding preferred clinical outcome measures following image-guided tumor ablation or clear definitions of oncologic end points. This consensus document proposes standardized definitions for a broad range of oncologic outcome measures with recommendations on how to uniformly document, analyze, and report outcomes. The initiative was coordinated by the Society of Interventional Oncology in collaboration with the Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-Event End Points in Cancer Trials, or DATECAN, group. According to predefined criteria, based on experience with clinical trials, an international panel of 62 experts convened. Recommendations were developed using the validated three-step modified Delphi consensus method. Consensus was reached on when to assess outcomes per patient, per session, or per tumor; on starting and ending time and survival time definitions; and on time-to-event end points. Although no consensus was reached on the preferred classification system to report complications, quality of life, and health economics issues, the panel did agree on using the most recent version of a validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire. This article provides a framework of key opinion leader recommendations with the intent to facilitate a clear interpretation of results and standardize worldwide communication. Widespread adoption will improve reproducibility, allow for accurate comparisons, and avoid misinterpretations in the field of interventional oncology research. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Liddell in this issue.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF