Search

History A 25-year-old woman was referred to our breast clinic for assessment of a palpable mass in her left breast that developed quickly in 2 weeks. She denied any associated fever, chills, redness, or pain. She had no relevant medical or surgical history; no evidence of recent pregnancy, abortion, or breastfeeding; and no family history of breast cancer. Clinical examination enabled confirmation of a firm mass occupying the retroareolar region and the outer quadrant of the left breast with no skin retraction, edema, or erythema. There was no evidence of enlarged axillary lymph nodes. US of the left breast (Fig 1), bilateral breast MRI (Fig 2), and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (Fig 3) were performed.

History A 25-year-old woman was referred to our breast clinic for assessment of a palpable mass in her left breast that developed quickly in 2 weeks. She denied any associated fever, chills, redness, or pain. She had no relevant medical or surgical history; no evidence of recent pregnancy, abortion, or breastfeeding; and no family history of breast cancer. Clinical examination enabled confirmation of a firm mass occupying the retroareolar region and the outer quadrant of the left breast with no skin retraction, edema, or erythema. There was no evidence of enlarged axillary lymph nodes. US of the left breast, bilateral breast MRI, and fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT were performed.

History A 55-year-old woman presented to our breast clinic with 1-year history of lancinating pain in the right breast that was exacerbated by blunt pressure and cold temperature. She denied any family history of breast cancer or any personal history of trauma, infection, or surgery of the breast. On clinical examination, exquisite pain was generated by simple light pressure over the upper outer quadrant of the right breast. Mammography and ultrasounography (US) with Doppler analysis of the right breast were painful but were performed with the least pressure possible.

To develop a classification method based on the statistical backscatter properties of tissues that can be used as an ancillary tool to the usual Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification for solid breast lesions identified at ultrasonography (US).This study received institutional review board approval, and all subjects provided informed consent. Eighty-nine women (mean age, 50 years; age range, 22-82 years) with 96 indeterminate solid breast lesions (BI-RADS category 4-5; mean size, 13.2 mm; range, 2.6-44.7 mm) were enrolled. Prior to biopsy, additional radiofrequency US images were obtained, and a 3-second cine sequence was used. The research data were analyzed at a later time and were not used to modify patient management decisions. The lesions were segmented manually, and parameters of the homodyned K distribution (α, k, and μn values) were extracted for three regions: the intratumoral zone, a 3-mm supratumoral zone, and a 5-mm infratumoral zone. The Mann-Whitney rank sum test was used to identify parameters with the best discriminating value, yielding intratumoral α, supratumoral k, and infratumoral μn values.The 96 lesions were classified as follows: 48 BI-RADS category 4A lesions, 16 BI-RADS category 4B lesions, seven BI-RADS category 4C lesions, and 25 BI-RADS category 5 lesions. There were 24 cancers (25%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.65, 0.86). Overall, 24% of biopsies (in 17 of 72 lesions) could have been spared. By limiting analysis to lesions with a lower likelihood of malignancy (BI-RADS category 4A-4B), this percentage increased to 26% (16 of 62 lesions). Among benign lesions, the model was used to correctly classify 10 of 38 fibroadenomas (26%) and three of seven stromal fibroses (43%).The statistical model performs well in the classification of solid breast lesions at US, with the potential of preventing one in four biopsies without missing any malignancy.

To retrospectively evaluate the interobserver agreement of radiologists who used the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon to characterize and categorize ultrasonographic (US) features of breast masses.No institutional review board approval or patient consent was required. Five breast radiologists retrospectively independently evaluated 267 breast masses (113 benign and 154 malignant masses in 267 patients) by using the BI-RADS US lexicon. Reviewers were blinded to mammographic images, medical history, and pathologic findings. Interobserver agreement was assessed with the Aickin revised kappa statistic.Interobserver agreement varied from fair for evaluation of mass margins (kappa = 0.36) to moderate for evaluation of lesion boundary (kappa = 0.48), echo pattern (kappa = 0.58), and posterior acoustic features (kappa = 0.47) to substantial for evaluation of mass orientation (kappa = 0.70) and shape (kappa = 0.64). For small (or =0.7 cm; n = 49) or malignant (n = 154) masses, low concordance was noted for margin descriptors (kappa = 0.30 and 0.28, respectively) and BI-RADS category (kappa = 0.21 and 0.26, respectively). Overall, only fair agreement was obtained for BI-RADS category (kappa = 0.30). Agreement for subdivisions 4a, 4b, and 4c of BI-RADS category 4 was fair (kappa = 0.33), fair (kappa = 0.32), and poor (kappa = 0.17), respectively.Reproducibility of US BI-RADS terminology is good except for margin evaluation. A trend toward lower concordance was noted for the evaluation of small masses and malignant lesions. Classification into subdivisions 4a, 4b, and 4c was poorly reproducible.