Search

Accurate precipitation estimates are crucial for various hydrological and environmental applications. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of three widely used satellite-based precipitation datasets (SPDs)—PERSIANN, CHIRPS, and MERRA—and a monthly reanalysis dataset—TERRA—that include data from across the contiguous United States (CONUS) and Hawaii, at daily, monthly, and yearly timescales. We present the performance of these SPDs using ground-based observations maintained by the USGS (United States Geological Survey). We employ evaluation metrics, such as the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE), and mean absolute error (MAE), to identify optimal SPDs. Our findings reveal that MERRA outperforms PERSIANN and CHIRPS on a daily scale, while CHIRPS is the best-performing dataset on a monthly scale. However, all datasets show limitations in accurately estimating absolute amount of precipitation totals. The spatial analysis highlights regional variations in the datasets' performance, with MERRA consistently performing well across most regions, while CHIRPS and PERSIANN show strengths in specific areas and months. We also observe a consistent seasonal pattern in the performance of all datasets. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on satellite precipitation estimates and their applications, guiding the selection of suitable datasets based on the required temporal resolution and regional context. As such SPDs continue to evolve, ongoing evaluation and improvement efforts are crucial to enhance their reliability and support informed decision-making in various fields, including water resource management, agricultural planning, and climate studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurate precipitation estimates are crucial for various hydrological and environmental applications. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of three widely used satellite-based precipitation datasets (SPDs)—PERSIANN, CHIRPS, and MERRA—and a monthly reanalysis dataset—TERRA—that include data from across the contiguous United States (CONUS) and Hawaii, at daily, monthly, and yearly timescales. We present the performance of these SPDs using ground-based observations maintained by the USGS (United States Geological Survey). We employ evaluation metrics, such as the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE), and mean absolute error (MAE), to identify optimal SPDs. Our findings reveal that MERRA outperforms PERSIANN and CHIRPS on a daily scale, while CHIRPS is the best-performing dataset on a monthly scale. However, all datasets show limitations in accurately estimating absolute amount of precipitation totals. The spatial analysis highlights regional variations in the datasets’ performance, with MERRA consistently performing well across most regions, while CHIRPS and PERSIANN show strengths in specific areas and months. We also observe a consistent seasonal pattern in the performance of all datasets. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on satellite precipitation estimates and their applications, guiding the selection of suitable datasets based on the required temporal resolution and regional context. As such SPDs continue to evolve, ongoing evaluation and improvement efforts are crucial to enhance their reliability and support informed decision-making in various fields, including water resource management, agricultural planning, and climate studies.

Surface bare soil albedo is an important variable in climate modeling studies and satellite-based retrievals of land-surface properties. In this study, we used multiyear 500 m albedo products from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) to derive the bare soil albedo for seven spectral bands and three broadbands over the contiguous United States (CONUS). The soil line based on red and green spectral signatures derived from MODIS data was used as the basis to detect and extract bare soil albedo. A comparison against bare soil albedo derived from 30 m Landsat data has been made, showing that the MODIS bare soil albedo had a bias of 0.003 and a root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of 0.036. We found that the bare soil albedo was negatively correlated with soil moisture from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-Earth Observing System (AMSR-E), with a relatively stable exponential relationship reflecting the darkening effect that moisture has on most soils. However, quantification of the relationship between bare soil albedo and soil moisture still needs to be improved through simultaneous and instantaneous measurements at a finer spatial resolution. Statistics of the multiyear climatological bare soil albedos calculated using soil types and the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) land cover types suggest that: Land cover type is a better indicator for determining the magnitude of bare soil albedos for the vegetated areas, as the vegetation density is correlated with soil moisture; and soil type is a better indicator for determining the slope of soil lines over sparsely vegetated areas, as it contains information of the soil texture, roughness, and composition. The generated bare soil albedo can be applied to improve the parameterization of surface energy budget in climate and remote sensing models as well as the retrieval accuracy of some satellite products.

Surface bare soil albedo is an important variable in climate modeling studies and satellite-based retrievals of land-surface properties. In this study, we used multiyear 500 m albedo products from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) to derive the bare soil albedo for seven spectral bands and three broadbands over the contiguous United States (CONUS). The soil line based on red and green spectral signatures derived from MODIS data was used as the basis to detect and extract bare soil albedo. A comparison against bare soil albedo derived from 30 m Landsat data has been made, showing that the MODIS bare soil albedo had a bias of 0.003 and a root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of 0.036. We found that the bare soil albedo was negatively correlated with soil moisture from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-Earth Observing System (AMSR-E), with a relatively stable exponential relationship reflecting the darkening effect that moisture has on most soils. However, quantification of the relationship between bare soil albedo and soil moisture still needs to be improved through simultaneous and instantaneous measurements at a finer spatial resolution. Statistics of the multiyear climatological bare soil albedos calculated using soil types and the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) land cover types suggest that: Land cover type is a better indicator for determining the magnitude of bare soil albedos for the vegetated areas, as the vegetation density is correlated with soil moisture; and soil type is a better indicator for determining the slope of soil lines over sparsely vegetated areas, as it contains information of the soil texture, roughness, and composition. The generated bare soil albedo can be applied to improve the parameterization of surface energy budget in climate and remote sensing models as well as the retrieval accuracy of some satellite products. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]