Search

Abstract Background In the Japanese guidelines on combination peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) therapy, patients with serum beta 2 microglobulin (β2MG) levels less than 30 mg/L are recommended. And PD patients with β2MG more than 30 mg/L are considered to transfer to the PD + HD combination therapy. However, the resultant changes in serum β2MG levels by the introduction of PD + HD combination therapy and the factors influencing the change have not clearly elucidated. Methods We retrospectively studied 11 PD patients (mean age 56.4 ± 12.9 years, 10 males) with baseline β2MG levels > 30 mg/L with respect to changes in β2MG and its related factors for 12 months after the introduction of combination therapy of PD plus once a week HD (4 h) using a high-performance dialyzer. Laboratory data including hemoglobin, albumin, C-reactive protein, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and the patients’ demographic profiles, and HD-related factors, such as Kt/V and blood flow rate, were assessed. Results Serum β2MG levels decreased statistically significantly after the introduction of combination therapy: from 36.7 ± 6.7 mg/L at 0 months, to 33.4 ± 6.1 mg/L at 3 months (p = 0.030, compared to baseline), 32.9 ± 4.5 mg/L at 6 months (p = 0.009), and 33.3 ± 5.3 mg/L at 12 months (p = 0.023), respectively. However, only 27–36% patients achieved target β2MG levels of

Abstract Background This article is a duplicated publication from the Japanese version of “2019 JSDT Guidelines for Peritoneal Dialysis” with permission from the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy (JSDT). This clinical practice guideline (CPG) was developed primarily by the Working Group on Revision of Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Guidelines of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. Recently, the definition and creation process for CPGs have become far more rigorous; traditional methods and formats no longer adhere to current standards. To improve the reliability of international transmission of our findings, CPGs are created in compliance with the methodologies developed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group. Part 2 of this PD guideline is the first CPG developed by our society that conforms to the GRADE approach. Methods Detailed processes were created in accordance with the Cochrane handbook and the GRADE approach developed by the GRADE working group. Results Clinical question (CQ)1: Is the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RAS inhibitors), such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), effective in PD patients? Recommendation: We suggest the usage of RAS inhibitors (ACEI and ARB) in PD patients (GRADE 2C). CQ2: Icodextrin or glucose solution: which is more useful as a dialysate among patients with PD? Recommendation: We suggest using icodextrin when managing body fluids in PD patients (GRADE 2C). CQ3: Is it better to apply or not apply mupirocin/gentamicin ointment to the exit site? Recommendation: We suggest not applying mupirocin/gentamicin ointment to the exit sites of PD patients (GRADE 2C). CQ4: Which surgical approach is more desirable when a PD catheter is placed, open surgery or laparoscopic surgery? No recommendation. CQ5: Which administration route of antibiotics is better in PD patients with peritonitis, intravenous or intraperitoneal? Recommendation: We suggest intraperitoneal administration of antibiotics in PD patients with peritonitis (GRADE 2C). Note: The National Insurance does not currently cover intraperitoneal administration. CQ6: Is peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis better as the first renal replacement therapy in diabetic patients? No recommendation. Conclusions In the future, we suggest that society members construct their own evidence to answer CQs not brought up in this guideline, and thereby show the achievements of Japan worldwide.

Abstract Background Complications of acute kidney injury (AKI) are common in patients with coronavirus disease in 2019 (COVID-19). However, clinical characteristics of COVID-19-associated AKI are poorly described. We present two cases of severe COVID-19 patients with AKI. Case presentation A 77-year-old woman was suspected of having vancomycin-associated AKI, and a 45-year-old man was suspected of having heme pigment-induced AKI caused by rhabdomyolysis. The granular cast, which is known to be a valuable diagnostic tool for confirming the diagnosis of acute tubular necrosis, was detected in both patients at the onset of AKI. Interestingly, both patients also developed microscopic hematuria at the occurrence of AKI, and one patient had elevated d-dimer and low platelet levels simultaneously. Conclusions Some reports suggested that COVID-19-associated microangiopathy contributed to the kidney damage. Therefore, it is possible that our patients might have accompanied renal microangiopathy, and that this pathological background may have caused exaggerated tubular damage by vancomycin or heme pigment. The etiology of AKI in patients with COVID-19 is multifactorial. Superimposition of nephrotoxin(s) and virus-associate intra-renal microangiopathy may be a crucial trigger of kidney injury leading to severe AKI in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, in COVID-19 patients, risk factors for AKI should be taken into consideration to prevent its progression into severe AKI.

Abstract Background Icodextrin enhances peritoneal filtration for patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). However, clinically important outcomes have not yet been analyzed using authentic, objective statistical methods. The present systematic review aimed to determine the risks and benefits of icodextrin compared with a glucose-based solution with respect to clinically important and patient-centered outcomes. Methods We systematically investigated only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by adopting the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review (2014) and searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for eligible studies reported in the literature. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Results We finally evaluated important outcomes in 13 RCTs. Icodextrin significantly decreased the number of reported episodes of uncontrolled fluid overload in four RCTs that involved 236 patients (relative risk [RR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.82; moderate certainty evidence). However, the inclusion of icodextrin for peritoneal ultrafiltration did not significantly differ in six RCTs involving 252 patients (mean difference [MD], 186.76 mL; 95% CI, − 47.08 to 420.59; low certainty evidence). Regarding other clinically important outcomes, all-cause mortality in 10 RCTs involving 1106 patients (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.71; low certainty evidence) and technical survival in five RCTs involving 470 patients (RR, 0.57; 95%CI, 0.29 to 1.12; low certainty evidence) were not significant. Urine volume in four RCTs involving 136 patients, residual renal function in five RCTs involving 181 patients and peritoneal function measured as the ratio of solute concentration in dialysate and plasma (D/P ratio) in two RCTs involving 105 patients were not specifically affected by icodextrin, and the results for adverse events were similar between icodextrin and glucose PD solutions. Conclusion Icodextrin could relieve uncontrolled fluid overload without adding risk. However, a significant effect on clinically relevant outcomes such as technical survival and overall patient survival was not suggested. More trials are required to increase the statistical power and to verify the value of icodextrin in clinical practice. Trial registration PROSPERO, CRD42018104360

Abstract Background The definition and guideline of sepsis and septic shock were recently updated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability of Third Consensus Definitions of Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) to predict outcomes among patients with community-acquired sepsis receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study between January 2013 and December 2015 in a single university hospital. From 368 patients receiving CRRT for various reasons, 64 patients who suffered from community-acquired sepsis and required CRRT were selected and evaluated using the current and previous sepsis criteria. We additionally assessed infection characteristics. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and the secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results Of the 64 participants (70.3% male, median age 66.5 years), 33 (51.6%) administered antimicrobials before admission. The most common source of infections was pneumonia, and 27 participants (42.2%) had positive cultures. The Sepsis-3 criteria identified 64 cases (100%) as sepsis at the start of CRRT, while the previous criteria identified 44 cases (68.8%). According to the Sepsis-3 criteria, the 28-day mortality of sepsis and septic shock were 31.3% (20/64) and 46% (17/37), and in-hospital mortality was 43.8% (28/64) and 62.2% (23/37), respectively. Septic shock diagnosed using the Sepsis-3 criteria predicted mortality (log-rank P = 0.0001); however, using the previous criteria was not associated with mortality (log-rank P = 0.437). Among variables, lactate levels ≥ 2 mmol/L and SOFA score ≥ 14 were significantly associated with mortalities, with an optimal cutoff value for lactate of 1.8 mmol/L (AUC 0.777, sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 58.3%). Although age ≥ 65 years predicted in-hospital mortality, and pre-hospital antimicrobial therapy tended to be associated with 28-day mortality, we did not detect any association between outcomes and the CRRT regimen or general risk factors (e.g., acute kidney injury, serum creatinine levels, and comorbidities). Conclusions Our data suggests that the Sepsis-3 criteria predicted survival more accurately than the previous criteria among patients with community-acquired sepsis receiving CRRT. This is based on lactate levels and SOFA scores being strongly associated with mortality.