Search

What is the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of an interpretable artificial intelligence (AI) model for embryo selection in a prospective clinical trial? This single-centre prospective cohort study was carried out from October 2021 to March 2022. A total of 330 eligible patients were assigned to their preferred groups, with 250 patients undergoing a fresh single-blastocyst transfer cycle after the exclusion criteria had been applied. For the AI-assisted group (AAG), embryologists selected the embryos for transfer based on the ranking recommendations provided by an interpretable AI system, while with the manual group, embryologists used the Gardner grading system to make their decisions. The implantation rate was significantly higher in the AAG than the manual group (80.87% versus 68.15%, P = 0.022). No significant difference was found in terms of monozygotic twin rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate and ectopic pregnancy rate between the groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in terms of neonatal outcomes, including gestational weeks, premature birth rate, birth height, birthweight, sex ratio at birth and newborn malformation rate. The consensus rate between the AI and retrospective analysis by the embryologists was significantly higher for good-quality embryos (i.e. grade 4BB or higher) versus poor-quality embryos (i.e. less than 4BB) (84.71% versus 25%, P < 0.001). These prospective trial results suggest that the proposed AI system could effectively help embryologists to improve the implantation rate with single-blastocyst transfer compared with traditional manual evaluation methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Can a non-invasive embryo transfer strategy provide a reference for embryo selection to be established? Chromosome sequencing of 345 paired blastocyst culture medium and whole blastocyst samples was carried out and a non-invasive embryo grading system was developed based on the random forest machine learning algorithm to predict blastocyst ploidy. The system was validated in 266 patients, and a blinded prospective observational study was conducted to investigate clinical outcomes between machine learning-guided and traditional non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT-A) analyses. Embryos were graded as A, B or C according to their euploidy probability levels predicted by non-invasive chromosomal screening (NICS). Higher live birth rate was observed in A- versus C-grade embryos (50.4% versus 27.1%, P = 0.006) and B- versus C-grade embryos (45.3% versus 27.1%, P = 0.022) and lower miscarriage rate in A- versus C-grade embryos (15.9% versus 33.3%, P = 0.026) and B- versus C-grade embryos (14.3% versus 33.3%, P = 0.021). The embryo utilization rate was significantly higher through the machine learning strategy than the conventional dichotomic judgment of euploidy or aneuploidy in the niPGT-A analysis (78.8% versus 57.9%, P < 0.001). Better outcomes were observed in A- and B-grade embryos versus C-grade embryos and higher embryo utilization rates through the machine learning strategy compared with traditional niPGT-A analysis. A machine learning guided embryo grading system can be used to optimize embryo selection and avoid wastage of potential embryos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]