Search

Introduction: Endoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves has been widely recognized for treating hyperinflation in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema patients. The main challenges include the technical complexity of upper lobe implantation and the number of endobronchial valves required. These issues might be addressed by placing larger diameter valves in the lobar bronchus. This study evaluated the feasibility, efficiency, and safety of the new valve PulmValve (model PV-13) in porcine models. Methods: Six PV-13 valves were bronchoscopically implanted into the caudal lobe bronchus of six healthy pigs. The procedure time, valve deployment, and removability were recorded. Follow-up examinations included blood tests, chest CT scans, and bronchoscopy at 30 min, 14 days, 28 days, and 84 days post-procedure, with necropsy and pathological evaluations after the final follow-up examination. Results: The successful in vivo deployment and removal of PV-13 valves was established, with a median procedure time of 6.5 min. The distal lung volume reduction was evident at 30 min post-operation and was persistently monitored on day 84. No migration or malfunction of any PV-13 valves was detected, but a mild angle deviation was found in 3 cases. Coughing was observed in four pigs within the first 7 days and localized granulation tissue was observed in all pigs. No cases of pneumothorax, diffuse pneumonia, or hemoptysis were detected. Conclusions: In this study, we report the successful implantation and removal of a new valve PulmValve in a short operation time. Complete lobar atelectasis was induced without device migration, malfunction, or severe complications. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term, sustained effects and potential benefits in human patients. Plain Language Summary: Endoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves has been widely recognized as a treatment for advanced emphysema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The main challenges include the technical complexity of implanting valves in the upper lobes and the number of valves required. These issues may be addressed by using larger diameter endobronchial valves in the lobar bronchi. The newly developed PulmValve System offers five variants of valves designed to accommodate airways with diameters ranging from 7.0 to 15.0 mm. The system is specifically designed for lobar bronchial implantation, with valve diameters within the range of 10.5–16.5 mm. Our study reports the successful implantation and subsequent removal post-placement of the PulmValve (PV-13) within a short operative time in healthy porcine models. During an 84-day follow-up period, significant atelectasis was induced in the distal lung without evidence of device migration, malfunction, or severe complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Valve implantation provides a reversible effective therapy in a selected group of emphysema patients. Knowing predictors for successful therapy, the rate of treatment failure has decreased. Some patients, however, do not benefit, so that the valves may have to be removed. Objectives: To assess implant-related events, complications during valve removal, and clinical outcome after endoscopic procedure. Methods: The data of 76 consecutive emphysema patients who underwent valve removal > 6 months since implantation were collected. Results: Seventy-six patients (mean age 62 years, 54% male) underwent removal of all valves after a mean time of 624 days (193–3,043 days) since implantation. Granulation tissue was observed in 39.5% (30/76) and significant secretion in 34.2% (26/76). In 5.3% (4/76), valve removal was complicated requiring another bronchoscopy in 2 of them. In 5.3% (4/76) of the patients, one valve could not be removed and remained in situ. Bleeding requiring intervention occurred in 3.9% (3/76) during valve removal. Following bronchoscopy, there was a need for antibiotics in 34.2% (26/76), glucocorticosteroids in 1.3% (1/76), and both in 6.6% (5/76) due to productive cough or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation. Due to respiratory failure, invasive ventilation or noninvasive ventilation was necessary in 2.6% (2/76) and 6.6% (5/76), respectively, following procedure. No statistical significant change in lung function was observed following valve removal. Conclusions: Valve removal after > 6 months since implantation is feasible and associated with an acceptable safety profile. However, close monitoring of these patients with limited pulmonary reserve is recommended with particular attention to COPD exacerbations and respiratory failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) has been used to promote airway clearance in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for many years; however, its mechanism of action and benefits are unclear. Previous authors have suggested that PEP improves collateral ventilation via changes in lung volumes. Objectives: It was the aim of this study to determine whether PEP improves ventilation inhomogeneity more than controlled huffing and coughing in individuals with stable COPD. Methods: Twelve participants with COPD (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s 45% predicted) and chronic sputum expectoration performed PEP therapy (10-20 cm H2O) or controlled huffing and coughing in random order on alternate study days with a 48-hour washout. Measures of acinar and conductive airway ventilation (Sacin, Scond), lung volumes, spirometry and sputum wet weight were recorded before, immediately after and 90 min following treatment. Ease of expectoration [visual analogue scale (VAS)] and oxyhaemoglobin saturation were assessed immediately following treatment. Results: There were no significant differences between the effect of either test condition at any time point for any test parameter. Mean Sacin immediately following PEP and control conditions was 0.465 and 0.438 litre-1, respectively (p = 0.45 for comparison between conditions) and mean Scond was 0.042 and 0.039 litre-1 (p = 0.55). PEP therapy did not significantly enhance total mean sputum expectoration compared to controlled huffing and coughing (7.06 vs. 6.15 g; p = 0.51) and did not improve ease of expectoration (VAS PEP 4.8 cm vs. control 4.1 cm; p = 0.53). Conclusion: Any therapeutic benefits of PEP in individuals with COPD and chronic sputum expectoration are unlikely to be mediated by improvements in ventilation or lung volumes. Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]