Search

Background Patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) often experience impaired health status. In daily clinical practice, a short and easy instrument for assessing health status would be useful to help better understand the patient's condition. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is a simple questionnaire about respiratory symptoms and their impact. We aimed to examine the CAT's performance characteristics and to generate data to support its reliability and validity in patients with CTD-ILD. Methods We used data from 132 CTD-ILD patients evaluated at Tosei General Hospital from July 2011 to July 2016 to assess the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of the CAT. Results The mean age of the patients was 64.5 years and 87 (66%) were women. There were no significant differences in CAT score between any of the CTD subgroups. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.881) and repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.803) for the CAT score were acceptable. At baseline, CAT score was significantly associated with clinically meaningful measures of physiologic function, exercise capacity, and dyspnea. Change in CAT score over 6–12 months was also associated with change in other measures. In the distribution- and anchor-based analyses, the estimated minimal clinically important difference of CAT score was 1–4 points. Conclusion These data support the validity and reliability of CAT as a sensitive measure for assessing health status in patients with CTD-ILD.

Purpose Interstitial lung disease is a common extra-articular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA-ILD) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, limited data exist regarding predictors of mortality. We sought to examine the prognostic value of the high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) patterns in patients with RA-ILD. Materials and methods RA-ILD patients with HRCT patterns of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) or nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) were identified among a longitudinal cohort of individuals evaluated at National Jewish Health. A total of 158 subjects were included in the study. For each subject, the earliest available HRCT was reviewed independently by two expert thoracic radiologists blinded to clinical data. HRCT patterns were classified as demonstrating definite UIP, possible UIP, or NSIP. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated and survival was compared among the three patterns using a log rank test for trend. Results One hundred subjects (63%) had HRCT findings classified as definite UIP, 23 (15%) as possible UIP and 35 (22%) as NSIP. No difference in survival was seen between subjects with definite UIP versus those with possible UIP. The combined group of subjects with either definite- or possible UIP had significantly worse survival than those with NSIP (log-rank p = 0.03). Conclusions In patients with RA-ILD, patients with either definite UIP or possible UIP have equally poor survival when compared to those with an NSIP pattern.

Background May patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) require supplementary oxygen (O2) therapy to maintain normoxia. However, ambulatory O2 delivery devices are constraining and cumbersome. The physiologic and symptomatic impact of these devices on ILD patients is unknown. Methods We conducted a prospective study of 30 clinically stable ILD patients (with varying disease severity), half of whom used O2 at baseline. Each subject completed two six-minute walk tests (6MWTs); for O2 users, one walk was completed while wearing a backpack (weight 7.2 pounds) containing a tank with compressed O2, and for non-users, one walk was completed with a similarly-weighted backpack. For each subject, during the second walk, no backpack was worn; for the second walk, O2 users received oxygen via a stationary delivery system. For both walks, O2 non-users wore a portable metabolic system, which measured variables related to respiratory physiology and gas exchange. Borg dyspnea and exertion ratings were recorded after each walk. Results Wearing the O2-containing backpack resulted in decreased distance covered during the 6MWT, and increased dyspnea and perceived exertion among O2 users. While wearing the weighted backpack, O2 non-users had a significantly lower peripheral O2 saturation and distance-saturation product. Compared with carrying O2 in the backpack, receiving O2 via the stationary concentrator resulted in the largest improvement in walk distance for the three subjects with greatest impairment at baseline (6MWT ≤ 300 m). Conclusion Among ILD patients, carrying portable O2 versus receiving O2 via a stationary concentrator results in significantly greater dyspnea and shorter distances covered in timed testing. Patients with the greatest impairment may be affected most. When prescribing O2, practitioners should alert patients to this effect and help patients decide on the best O2 delivery mode to meet their needs.

SummaryBackgroundDyspnea is a hallmark symptom of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and dyspnea induced physical activity limitation is a prominent driver of quality of life impairment among IPF patients.MethodsWe examined response data for the 21 physical activity items (the first 21 of 24) from the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD) collected at baseline in a recently conducted IPF trial. We used Rasch analysis and hypothesis testing with conventional statistical methodology to achieve three objectives: 1) to examine the items to identify the one characteristic that distinguishes one from another; 2) to asses these items for their ability to measure dyspnea severity in IPF; 3) to use the items to develop a dyspnea ruler.ResultsThe sample comprised 178 subjects. The 21 items fit the Rasch model. There was very strong correlation between Rasch item severity and their metabolic equivalents (METS) values (r = −0.86, p

Summary Background Fibrosis or inflammation of the bronchioles is a well-known manifestation of connective tissue disease (CTD). However, the natural history of CTD-related bronchiolitis is largely unknown. Methods We analyzed consecutive patients evaluated at National Jewish Health (Denver, CO) from 1998 to 2008 with CTD and surgical lung biopsy-confirmed bronchiolitis. Linear mixed effects models were used to estimate the longitudinal postbronchodilator FEV 1 %predicted (%pred) course and differences between subjects with or without constrictive bronchiolitis (CB). Results Of 28 subjects with a mean age of 53 ± 9 years, fourteen (50%) had CB. The most common CTD diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis ( n = 14; 50%). There were no significant differences in demographics, smoking status, underlying CTD diagnoses, 6-min walk distance, dyspnea score or drug therapy between subjects with CB and those with cellular bronchiolitis. Three subjects with CB (11%) and four with cellular bronchiolitis (14%) died. Compared with subjects with CB, those with cellular bronchiolitis had higher mean FEV 1 %pred at all times. There were no significant differences in FEV 1 %pred slope within- or between-groups (CB vs. cellular bronchiolitis) preceding surgical lung biopsy or afterward. Conclusion Subjects with CTD-related CB had lower FEV 1 %pred values than those with CTD-related cellular bronchiolitis at all time points, but FEV 1 %pred remained stable over time in both groups regardless of therapy received.

RationaleHealth-related quality of life (HRQL) is impaired among patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Little is understood about HRQL in specific subtypes of ILD.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to characterize and identify clinical determinants of HRQL among patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) and compare them to patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).MethodsWe identified patients with a diagnosis of RA-ILD and IPF from an ongoing longitudinal cohort of ILD patients. HRQL was measured at their baseline visit using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), versions 1 and 2. Regression models were used to characterize and understand the relationship between selected baseline clinical covariates, the physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) of the SF-36.Measurements and main resultsRA-ILD patients (n=50) were more likely to be younger and female compared to IPF patients (n=50). After controlling for age and pulmonary function, RA-ILD patients had a lower HRQL compared to IPF patients, as measured by the PCS (P=0.03), with significant differences in two of four PCS domains - bodily pain (P&nbsp

Objective To describe the clinical phenotype and natural history of a cohort of patients with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). Methods A retrospective, single center study of 56 patients with IPAF evaluated between February 2008 and August 2014. All clinical data were extracted from the electronic medical record and longitudinal changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) were analyzed with mixed-effects, piecewise linear regression models that considered time as a continuous factor. Results All patients fulfilled classification criteria for IPAF. The majority were women (71%) and never smokers (68%). The most frequently identified clinical features were Raynaud's phenomenon (39%), distal digital fissuring (29%), Gottron's sign (18%) and inflammatory arthropathy (16%). The most frequently identified serologies were antinuclear antibody (ANA) (48%), anti-Ro (SSA) (43%) and anti-tRNA-synthetase antibodies (36%). Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (57.1%) followed by NSIP with organizing pneumonia (18%) were the most common radiologic patterns, while usual interstitial pneumonia was identified in only 9%. All but one patient was treated with immunosuppression: prednisone (82%) and mycophenolate mofetil (76%) were the most frequently used agents. During a follow-up period of 284.9 ± 141.3 days, modeled longitudinal FVC% was stable (slope = 0.69/year) and no deaths were observed in the cohort. Conclusions In this single center study, patients with IPAF were predominately non-smoking women with high-resolution computed tomography scans that suggested NSIP. Their pulmonary physiology was stable, and during limited follow-up, no deaths were observed. Prospective and multi-center studies are needed to better inform our understanding of IPAF.

SummaryBackgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive interstitial lung disease that often causes disabling dyspnea. In IPF and other lung diseases, patient-reported outcomes (PROs)—questionnaires designed to gather information from the patient's perspective—can determine whether therapies affect dyspnea or other outcomes meaningful to patients. Before a PRO can be used confidently as an outcome measure in a longitudinal trial, studies must demonstrate the PRO's ability to capture change over time in the target population. Our goal in this study was to examine whether the UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire does so in patients with IPF.MethodsWe used data from the Sildenafil Trial of Exercise Performance in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (STEP-IPF) to perform analyses that examined associations between UCSD scores and five external measures (anchors) at baseline and over time. Anchors included the Activity domain from St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-A), the Physical Functioning domain from the SF-36 (SF36-PF), forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and distance walked during a timed walk test (6MWD). Linear regression models were used to examine relationships between UCSD scores and anchors over time.ResultsAt baseline, UCSD scores were weakly correlated with percent predicted FVC (−0.21, p = 0.005) and percent predicted DLCO (−0.20, p = 0.008), moderately correlated with 6MWD (−0.39, p

Summary Objective We sought to characterize a novel cohort of patients with lung disease, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody positivity, without rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or other connective tissue disease (CTD). Methods The study sample included 74 subjects with respiratory symptoms, evaluated January 2008–January 2010 and found to have a positive anti-CCP antibody but no evidence for RA or other CTD. Each underwent serologic testing, pulmonary physiology testing, and thoracic high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan as part of routine clinical evaluation. Results The majority of subjects were women, and most were former cigarette smokers. Four distinct radiographic phenotypes were identified: isolated airways disease (54%), isolated interstitial lung disease (ILD) (14%), mixed airways disease and ILD (26%), and combined pulmonary fibrosis with emphysema (7%). This cohort had a predominance of airways disease, either in isolation or along with a usual interstitial pneumonia-pattern of ILD. Among subjects with high-titer anti-CCP positivity ( n =33), three developed the articular manifestations of RA during a median follow-up of 449 days. Conclusion We have described a unique cohort of patients with anti-CCP antibody positivity and lung disease in the absence of existing RA or other CTD. The lung phenotypic characteristics of this cohort resemble those of established RA and a few of these patients have developed articular RA within a short period of follow-up. The implications of a positive anti-CCP antibody among patients with lung disease but not RA are not yet known, but we believe requires further investigation.

Summary Rationale Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is an important outcome in drug trials. Little is known about how the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) perform in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Objectives To examine the validity of the SF-36 and SGRQ and to determine scores from each that would constitute a minimum important difference (MID). Methods We analyzed data from a recently completed trial that enrolled subjects with well-defined IPF who completed the SF-36, SGRQ, and Baseline/Transition Dyspnea Index at baseline and six months. We compared mean changes in HRQL scores between groups of subjects whose disease severity changed over six months according to clinical anchors (FVC, DLCO, and dyspnea). We estimated the MID for each domain by using both anchor- and distribution-based approaches. Main results Results supported the validity of the SF-36 and SGRQ for use in longitudinal studies. Mean changes in domain scores differed significantly between subjects whose clinical status improved and those whose clinical status declined according to the anchors. MID estimates for the SF-36 ranged from 2–4 points and from 5–8 points for the SGRQ. Conclusion In IPF, the SF-36 and SGRQ possess reasonable validity for differentiating subjects whose disease severity changes over time. More studies are needed to continue the validation process, to refine estimates of the MIDs for the SF-36 or SGRQ, and to determine if a disease-specific instrument will perform better than either of these.

Summary Objectives To describe the clinical features of patients presenting with “idiopathic” interstitial pneumonia that were diagnosed with anti-synthetase syndrome based on clinical features and positive anti-PL-7 or PL-12 antibodies. Methods Over a 24-month period, we evaluated 37 patients who presented with clinical features of anti-synthetase (AS) syndrome, negative anti-Jo-1 antibodies, and who were assessed for other anti-tRNA synthetase (anti-tRS) antibodies. All data were abstracted from the medical record. Results Nine (24%) were confirmed to have non-anti-Jo-1 positive AS syndrome based on clinical features and the presence of other anti-tRS antibodies (seven with anti-PL-7, two with anti-PL-12 antibodies). All presented with dyspnea as the initial symptom and with ILD as the first manifestation. Elevated CPK was identified in three patients but only two had muscle weakness. Pulmonary physiology revealed restriction (forced vital capacity 60% of predicted) and impaired gas transfer (diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide 40% of predicted). All had similar findings on thoracic HRCT scans, with basilar predominance of abnormalities and patterns suggestive of non-specific interstitial pneumonia and organizing pneumonia. Immunomodulatory therapies were used to treat the ILD—responses were variable, but some subjects clearly improved. Conclusion Anti-PL-7 and PL-12 antibodies may be more common among patients presenting with “idiopathic” interstitial pneumonia than formerly considered and should be checked in patients with features of AS syndrome despite a negative screen for anti-nuclear or anti-Jo-1 antibodies. Further research is needed to advance understanding of anti-PL-7 or anti-PL-12-positive AS syndrome, including its prognosis and optimal approaches to therapy.

SummaryIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a devastating disease that afflicts patients with relentlessly progressive shortness of breath [Joint Statement of the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:646–641]. Despite nearly 30 years of intense investigation, effective therapy for IPF remains elusive; median survival rates have stubbornly remained less than five years from the time of diagnosis [Bjoraker JA, Ryu JH, Edwin MK, Meyers J, Tazelaar H, Schroeder D, et al. Prognostic significance of histopathologic subsets in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:199–2032, Flaherty KR, Thwaite E, Kazerooni EA, Gross B, Toews GB, Colby TV, et al. Radiological versus histological diagnosis in UIP and NSIP: survival implications. Thorax 2003;58:143–483], and no medical therapy has been proved to be in any way effective for the treatment of this disease. Without medications that help IPF patients live longer, an important question to ask is whether there are interventions that might allow these people to live better—to be more active; to experience less dyspnea, less depression, less anxiety; to possess a greater sense of control over their disease; and to have better quality of life. Pulmonary rehabilitation helps to accomplish many of these goals in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and emerging data suggest that it may do the same for patients with IPF.

Summary Background In patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease (fILD), gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is highly prevalent, perhaps because of the effects of lung fibrosis on altering intrathoracic pressure, diaphragm morphology and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function. For unclear reasons, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is also highly prevalent among patients with fILD. We conducted this study to test our hypothesis that, in patients with fILD, OSA would exacerbate diaphragm/LES dysfunction and increase the propensity for—and severity of – GER. Methods We identified patients with fILD who underwent screening polysomnogram and pH or pH/impedence probe at our center during the same week. We examined the association between OSA and GER and used logistic regression to determine independent predictors of OSA or GER. Results In 54 included subjects, neither OSA (dichotomous) nor apnea hypopnea index (continuous) predicted the presence of GER. Regardless of body position (upright, recumbent), GER was no more frequent or severe among subjects with OSA vs. those without OSA. Subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) had an odds of GER nearly seven-fold greater than subjects with other forms of fILD (odds ratio = 6.84, 95% confidence interval 1.36–34.43, p = 0.02). For the entire cohort and the subgroup with IPF, there was no correlation between pulmonary physiology and GER. Conclusions In fILD, OSA does not appear to promote GER. Research is needed to determine if compensatory mechanisms emanating from the crural diaphragm prevent GER in fILD patients with OSA and to sort out whether GER has a role in the pathogenesis of certain forms of fILD.

SummaryBackgroundHRQL in IPF patients is impaired. Data from other respiratory diseases led us to hypothesize that significant gender differences in HRQL in IPF also exist.MethodsData were drawn from the NIH-sponsored Lung Tissue Research Consortium (LTRC). Demographic and pulmonary physiology data along with MMRC, SF-12, and SGRQ scores from women vs. men were compared with two-sample t-tests. Multivariate linear regression was used to examine the association between SF-12 component scores and gender while adjusting for other relevant variables.ResultsThe study sample consisted of 147 men and 74 women. Among several baseline variables, only DLCO% predicted differed between women and men, (43.7 vs. 38.0, p=0.03). In general, men exhibited lower (better) MMRC scores (1.7 vs. 2.4, p=0.02), particularly those with milder disease as measured by DLCO% predicted. In an adjusted analysis, SF-12 PCS scores in men were lower (worse) than women (p=0.01), an effect that was more pronounced in men with greater dyspnea scores. In a similar analysis, SF-12 MCS scores in women were lower than men (worse) (48.3 vs. 54.4, p=0.0004), an effect that was more pronounced in women with greater dyspnea scores.ConclusionsSignificant gender differences in HRQL exist in IPF. As compared to women, men reported less severe dyspnea, had worse SF-12 PCS scores, but better SF-12 MCS scores. Dyspnea appears to have a greater impact on the physical HRQL of men and the emotional HRQL of women. An improved understanding of the mechanism behind these differences is needed to better target interventions.

RATIONALE: Dyspnea is the cardinal symptom in patients with any type of interstitial lung disease (ILD); however, there are limited data on dyspnea among patients with connective tissue disease-related ILD (i.e., CTD-ILD). OBJECTIVES: To explore the utility of two dyspnea instruments (the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire [UCSD] and the Dyspnea-12 [D-12]) and use their scores to examine the impact of dyspnea on the lives of patients with CTD-ILD. METHODS: Subjects were enrolled from the Autoimmune Lung Database (ALD) at National Jewish Health. Chronbach's alpha was used to assess the internal consistency reliability of the two dyspnea questionnaires. We used the Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire [MDHAQ] as a measure of health status and examined associations between health status and dyspnea by using Pearson product-moment correlation and linear regression. RESULTS: The internal consistency reliability of each of the two dyspnea questionnaires was excellent (alpha=0.9 for each). There were significant correlations between either of the two dyspnea measures and MDHAQ components. While controlling for ILD severity, dyspnea as assessed by the UCSD, was a significant predictor of physical function (p=0.04), psychological well-being (p=0.005), and fatigue (p=0.02); dyspnea as assessed the D-12, was a significant predictor of psychological well-being (p=0.01) and global status (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Dyspnea significantly affects day-to-day functioning and global well-being in patients with CTD-ILD. The UCSD and D-12 yield meaningful information about these patients that measures of pulmonary physiology cannot. Future studies should examine other performance characteristics of these self-report measures in patients with CTD-ILD. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Summary Background: In studies of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), whites makeup the vast majority of subjects. Whether ethnic/racial differences in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis occur in the general population is unknown. Methods: To compare the presence of IPF between ethnic/racial groups of U.S. decedents from 1989 to 2007 by using the National Center for Health Statistics database. Results: There were 251,058 U.S. decedents with IPF; 87.2% were non-Hispanic whites (White), 5.1% were non-Hispanic African American (Black), 5.4% were Hispanic, and 2.2% were from other ethnic/racial groups (Other). Whites coded with IPF died older than those in the other groups (77.9 years vs. 72.1 years for Blacks, 75.3 years for Hispanics, and 75.6 years for Others; p < 0.0001 for all pairwise comparisons). When controlling for age and for sex, compared with Whites, both Hispanics and Others were more likely to be coded with IPF (OR Z 1.47, 95% CI 1.44e1.49, p < 0.0001 and OR Z 1.29, 95% CI 1.26e1.36, p < 0.0001 respectively), while Blacks were significantly less likely to be coded with IPF (OR Z 0.48, 95% CI 0.47e0.49, p < 0.0001). Among decedents with IPF, Hispanics were more likely, and Blacks were less likely, than Whites to die from IPF (OR Z 1.24, 95% CI 1.20e1.29, p < 0.0001 and OR Z 0.91, 95% CI 0.87e0.94, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: From 1989 to 2007, Black decedents were lessdand Hispanics were moredlikely than Whites to die of/with IPF. Research is needed to determine if genetic differences between ethnic/racial groups explain these findings.