Search

Background: The underlying pathophysiological pathways how reverse triggering is being caused are not fully understood. Respiratory entrainment may be one of these mechanisms, but both terms are used interchangeably. We sought to characterize reverse triggering and the relationship with respiratory entrainment among mechanically ventilated children with and without acute lung injury., Methods: We performed a secondary phyiology analysis of two previously published data sets of invasively mechanically ventilated children < 18 years with and without lung injury mechanically ventilated in a continuous or intermittent mandatory ventilation mode. Ventilator waveforms, electrical activity of the diaphragm measured with surface electromyography and oesophageal tracings were analyzed for entrained and non-entrained reverse triggered breaths., Results: In total 102 measurements (3110 min) from 67 patients (median age 4.9 [1.8 ; 19,1] months) were analyzed. Entrained RT was identified in 12 (12%) and non-entrained RT in 39 (38%) recordings. Breathing variability for entrained RT breaths was lower compared to non-entrained RT breaths. We did not observe breath stacking during entrained RT. Double triggering often occurred during non-entrained RT and led to an increased tidal volume. Patients with respiratory entrainment related RT had a shorter duration of MV and length of PICU stay., Conclusions: Reverse triggering is not one entity but a clinical spectrum with different mechanisms and consequences., Trial Registration: Not applicable., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The patient's neuro-respiratory drive, measured as electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), quantifies the mechanical load on the respiratory muscles. It correlates with respiratory effort but requires a dedicated esophageal catheter. Transcutaneous (surface) monitoring of respiratory muscle electromyographic (sEMG) signals may be considered a suitable alternative to EAdi because of its non-invasive character, with the additional benefit that it allows for simultaneously monitoring of other respiratory muscles. We therefore sought to study the neuro-respiratory drive and timing of inspiratory muscles using sEMG in a cohort of children enrolled in a pediatric ventilation liberation trial. The neuro-mechanical coupling, relating the pressure generated by the inspiratory muscles to the sEMG signals of these muscles, was also calculated., Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized cross-over trial in ventilated patients aged < 5 years. sEMG recordings of the diaphragm and parasternal intercostal muscles (ICM), esophageal pressure tracings and ventilator scalars were simultaneously recorded during continuous spontaneous ventilation and pressure controlled-intermittent mandatory ventilation, and at three levels of pressure support. Neuro-respiratory drive, timing of diaphragm and ICM relative to the mechanical ventilator's inspiration and neuro-mechanical coupling were quantified., Results: Twenty-nine patients were included (median age: 5.9 months). In response to decreasing pressure support, both amplitude of sEMG (diaphragm: p = 0.001 and ICM: p = 0.002) and neuro-mechanical efficiency indices increased (diaphragm: p = 0.05 and ICM: p < 0.001). Poor correlations between neuro-respiratory drive and respiratory effort were found, with R 2 : 0.088 [0.021-0.152]., Conclusions: sEMG allows for the quantification of the electrical activity of the diaphragm and ICM in mechanically ventilated children. Both neuro-respiratory drive and neuro-mechanical efficiency increased in response to lower inspiratory assistance. There was poor correlation between neuro-respiratory drive and respiratory effort., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05254691. Registered 24 February 2022, registered retrospectively., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Ventilator liberation is one of the most challenging aspects in patients with respiratory failure. Most patients are weaned through a transition from full to partial respiratory support, whereas some advocate using a continuous spontaneous ventilation (CSV). However, there is little scientific evidence supporting the practice of pediatric ventilator liberation, including the timing of onset of and the approach to weaning mode. We sought to explore differences in patient effort between a pressure controlled continuous mode of ventilation (PC-CMV) [in this cohort PC assist/control (PC-A/C)] with a reduced ventilator rate and CSV, and to study changes in patient effort with decreasing PS., Methods: In this prospective physiology cross-over study, we randomized children < 5 years to first PC-A/C with a 25% reduction in ventilator rate, or CSV (continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP] + PS). Patients were then crossed over to the other arm. Patient effort was measured by calculating inspiratory work of breathing (WOB) using the Campbell diagram (WOB Campbell ), and by pressure-rate-product (PRP) and pressure-time-product (PTP). Respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) was used to calculate the phase angle. Measurements were obtained at baseline, during PC-A/C and CPAP + PS, and during decreasing set PS (maximum -6 cmH 2 O)., Results: Thirty-six subjects with a median age of 4.4 (IQR 1.5-11.9) months and median ventilation time of 4.9 (IQR 3.4-7.0) days were included. Nearly all patients (94.4%) were admitted with primary respiratory failure. WOB Campbell during baseline [0.67 (IQR 0.38-1.07) Joules/L] did not differ between CSV [0.49 (IQR 0.17-0.83) Joules/L] or PC-A/C [0.47 (IQR 0.17-1.15) Joules/L]. Neither PRP, PTP, ∆Pes nor phase angle was different between the two ventilator modes. Reducing pressure support resulted in a statistically significant increase in patient effort, albeit that these differences were clinically negligible., Conclusions: Patient effort during pediatric ventilation liberation was not increased when patients were in a CSV mode of ventilation compared to a ventilator mode with a ventilator back-up rate. Reducing the level of PS did not lead to clinically relevant increases in patient effort. These data may aid in a better approach to pediatric ventilation liberation. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT05254691. Registered 24 February 2022., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: For years, paediatric critical care practitioners used the adult American European Consensus Conference (AECC) and revised Berlin Definition (BD) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to study the epidemiology of paediatric ARDS (PARDS). In 2015, the paediatric specific definition, Paediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC) was developed. The use of non-invasive metrics of oxygenation to stratify disease severity were introduced in this definition, although this potentially may lead to a confounding effect of disease severity since it is more common to place indwelling arterial lines in sicker patients. We tested the hypothesis that PALICC outperforms AECC/BD in our high acuity PICU, which employs a liberal use of indwelling arterial lines and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV)., Methods: We retrospectively collected data from children < 18 years mechanically ventilated for at least 24 h in our tertiary care, university-affiliated paediatric intensive care unit. The primary endpoint was the difference in the number of PARDS cases between AECC/BD and PALICC. Secondary endpoints included mortality and ventilator free days. Performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC)., Results: Data from 909 out of 2433 patients was eligible for analysis. AECC/BD identified 35 (1.4%) patients (mortality 25.7%), whereas PALICC identified 135 (5.5%) patients (mortality 14.1%). All but two patients meeting AECC/Berlin criteria were also identified by PALICC. Almost half of the cohort (45.2%) had mild, 33.3% moderate and 21.5% severe PALICC PARDS at onset. Highest mortality rates were seen in patients with AECC acute lung injury (ALI)/mild Berlin and severe PALICC PARDS. The AUC-ROC for Berlin was the highest 24 h (0.392 [0.124-0.659]) after onset. PALICC showed the highest AUC-ROC at the same moment however higher than Berlin (0.531 [0.345-0.716]). Mortality rates were significantly increased in patients with bilateral consolidations (9.3% unilateral vs 26.3% bilateral, p = 0.025)., Conclusions: PALICC identified more new cases PARDS than the AECC/Berlin definition. However, both PALICC and Berlin performed poorly in terms of mortality risk stratification. The presence of bilateral consolidations was associated with a higher mortality rate. Our findings may be considered in future modifications of the PALICC criteria., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Patient-ventilator asynchrony is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A direct causative relationship between Patient-ventilator asynchrony and adverse clinical outcome have yet to be demonstrated. It is hypothesized that during trigger errors excessive pleural pressure swings are generated, contributing to increased work-of-breathing and self-inflicted lung injury. The objective of this study was to determine the additional work-of-breathing and pleural pressure swings caused by trigger errors in mechanically ventilated children., Methods: Prospective observational study in a tertiary paediatric intensive care unit in an university hospital. Patients ventilated > 24 h and < 18 years old were studied. Patients underwent a 5-min recording of the ventilator flow-time, pressure-time and oesophageal pressure-time scalar. Pressure-time-product calculations were made as a proxy for work-of-breathing. Oesophageal pressure swings, as a surrogate for pleural pressure swings, during trigger errors were determined., Results: Nine-hundred-and-fifty-nine trigger errors in 28 patients were identified. The additional work-of-breathing caused by trigger errors showed great variability among patients. The more asynchronous breaths were present the higher the work-of-breathing of these breaths. A higher spontaneous breath rate led to a lower amount of trigger errors. Patient-ventilator asynchrony was not associated with prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation or paediatric intensive care stay., Conclusions: The additional work-of-breathing caused by trigger errors in ventilated children can take up to 30-40% of the total work-of-breathing. Trigger errors were less common in patients breathing spontaneously and those able to generate higher pressure-time-product and pressure swings., Trial Registration: Not applicable.