Search

The diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy by analysis of pleural fluid using standard diagnostic tools is difficult. Recently, T-cell interferon-γ release assays (IGRA) have been introduced for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to establish the overall diagnostic accuracy of IGRA on both pleural fluid and peripheral blood, for diagnosing tuberculous pleurisy. A systematic review was performed of English language publications. Sensitivity, specificity and other measures of the accuracy of IGRA for the diagnosis tuberculous pleurisy using both pleural fluid and blood were pooled using a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize overall test performance. Seven out of eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic odds ratio were, for pleural fluid: 0.75, 0.82, 3.49, 0.24, 0.85, 0.70 and 19.04, respectively; and for blood: 0.80, 0.72, 2.86, 0.28, 0.78, 0.74 and 11.06, respectively. As almost 20% of non-tuberculosis patients would be erroneously treated for tuberculosis and 25% of patients with tuberculous pleurisy would be missed, pleural fluid IGRA are not useful for the clinical diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. A meta-analysis was performed to establish the overall diagnostic accuracy of T-cell IFN-γ release assays for tuberculous pleurisy. The current evidence does not support the use of T-cell IFN-γ release assays on either pleural fluid or blood, for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: CD4+CD25high regulatory T cells are increased in tuberculous pleural effusions (TPE). However, the mechanism by which CD4+CD25high T cells infiltrate into the pleural cavity is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the chemokines CCL22 and CCL17 are present in TPE, and the chemoattractant activity of these chemokines for infiltration of CD4+CD25high T cells into the pleural space. Methods: The concentrations of CCL22 and CCL17 were measured in pleural effusions from 33 patients with tuberculous pleurisy, 21 patients with pleural bacterial infections and 18 patients with transudative pleural effusions. T lymphocyte subsets in pleural effusions were assessed by flow cytometry. Pleural effusion cells were analysed for the expression of CCL22. The chemoattractant activity of CCL22 for CD4+CD25high T cells was assessed in vitro. Results: The frequency of CD4+CD25high T cells was significantly higher in TPE than in blood. High concentrations of CCL22 were detected in tuberculous effusions, but not in bacterial effusions or transudates. Macrophages and T cells in TPE expressed CCL22. Tuberculous pleural fluid was chemotactic for CD4+CD25high T cells in vitro, and anti-CCL22 antibody partly inhibited this chemotactic activity. Conclusions: CCL22 appeared to be increased in TPE compared with bacterial pleural effusions or transudates. CCL22 may be responsible for the infiltration of CD4+CD25high T cells into the pleural space of patients with tuberculous pleurisy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objective: Conventional tests are not always helpful in making a diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Many studies have investigated the utility of pleural carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the early diagnosis of MPE. The present meta-analysis determined the accuracy of CEA measurement in the diagnosis of MPE. Methods: A systematic review of English language studies was conducted and data on the accuracy of pleural CEA concentrations in the diagnosis of MPE were pooled using random effects models. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize the overall test performance. Results: Forty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The summary estimates for CEA in the diagnosis of MPE were: sensitivity 0.54 (95% CI: 0.52–0.55), specificity 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93–0.95), positive likelihood ratio 9.52 (95% CI: 6.97–13.01), negative likelihood ratio 0.49 (95% CI: 0.44–0.54) and diagnostic odds ratio 22.5 (95% CI: 15.6–32.5). Analysis of a subset of 11 studies which examined the value of pleural CEA in ruling out a diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma found that the sensitivity and specificity of a CEA level exceeding cut-off values were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.93–0.99) and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.55–0.65), respectively. Conclusions: Measurement of pleural CEA is likely to be a useful diagnostic tool for confirming MPE, and is also helpful in the differential diagnosis between malignant pleural mesothelioma and metastatic lung cancer. The results of CEA assays should be interpreted in parallel with clinical findings and the results of conventional tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]