Search

• Accurate cannulation is essential for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. • Japanese multicenter data were analyzed with propensity score matching. • Real-time ultrasound-guided cannulation was associated with shorter cannulation time. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), a bridge to treatments for cardiac arrest patients, can be technically challenging and requires expertise. While ultrasound guidance is frequently used for vascular access, its effects on cannulation time in patients treated with ECPR are poorly defined. We hypothesized that real-time ultrasound guidance would contribute to faster and safer cannulation for ECPR. This nationwide, multicenter, retrospective study analyzed data from 36 Japanese institutions. Patients who were over age 18 years and underwent ECPR between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2018, were included. Patients who underwent open surgical vascular access were excluded. Cannulation time and outcomes of patients who underwent real-time ultrasound-guided cannulation (i.e., ultrasound-guided group) were compared to those cannulated without the use of real-time ultrasound guidance (control group) using propensity score matching analysis. The ultrasound-guided group comprised 510 cases, whereas the control group comprised 941 cases. Of those, 443 propensity score-matched pairs were evaluated. Cannulation time in the ultrasound-guided group was 2.5 minutes shorter than in the control group [difference, −2.5 minutes; 95% Confidence interval (CI), −3.7 to −1.3, p < 0.001]. The incidence of catheter-related complications and the incidence of the poor neurological outcomes (Cerebral Performance Category ≥3) did not differ between groups [Odds ratio (OR), 1.51; 95% CI, 0.64–3.74; OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83–1.59]. Real-time ultrasound-guided cannulation was associated with shorter cannulation time of ECPR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different reperfusion strategies on neurological outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolism who received venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This was a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted in 36 institutions in Japan over six years. We included patients who underwent VA-ECMO and were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism caused by OHCA. Neurological outcomes were evaluated on the basis of the cerebral performance category at hospital discharge. We also assessed the association between reperfusion strategies and successful separation from ECMO. Among the 78 included patients, approximately half were successfully weaned from ECMO. Hospital mortality and favorable neurological outcomes at hospital discharge were 60.3% and 17.9%, respectively. Thirty-one patients (39.7%) underwent reperfusion strategies after ECMO, including 13 who received systemic thrombolytic therapy and 18 who underwent mechanical reperfusion strategy. After adjusting for prespecified covariates using the competing risk model, reperfusion strategies increased ECMO separation rate (systemic thrombolytic therapy: subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–4.17, P = 0.011; mechanical reperfusion strategy: sHR 1.70, 95% CI 0.86–3.41, P = 0.129) compared with anticoagulation therapy alone, whereas higher cardiac Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score decreased ECMO separation rate (sHR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67–0.97, P = 0.020). Favorable neurological outcomes were observed in less than 20% of patients with OHCA due to pulmonary embolism undergoing ECMO. Reperfusion strategies may be associated with shorter ECMO durations in these patients. https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr%5fe/ctr%5fview.cgi?recptno =R000041577 (unique identifier: UMIN000036490). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]